Cargando…

Laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration for pelvic malignancies: the technique and short-time outcome of 11 cases

BACKGROUND: Previous reports about laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration (LTPE) are still limited. In the present study, we described our single-center experience of the initial 11 cases. METHODS: Between April 2011 and September 2015, eight males and three females diagnosed as pelvic malignancies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Kunlin, Cai, Lin, Yao, Lin, Zhang, Zheng, Zhang, Cuijian, Wang, Xin, Tang, Jianqiang, Li, Xuesong, He, Zhisong, Zhou, Liqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26472147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0715-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Previous reports about laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration (LTPE) are still limited. In the present study, we described our single-center experience of the initial 11 cases. METHODS: Between April 2011 and September 2015, eight males and three females diagnosed as pelvic malignancies underwent LTPE by the same operation team. We retrospectively collected all cases’ parameters about surgical technique. Thirty-seven patients who received open surgery were also retrospectively collected. A comparison between LTPE and open surgery was performed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LTPE. RESULTS: Eleven cases successfully underwent the LTPE without any intraoperative complication. No open conversion was required. Eight patients underwent Bricker’s procedure. Three patients were performed with the cutaneous ureterostomy. Anus preservation operation was performed in three patients. Compared with open surgery, LTPE had longer mean operative time (565.2 vs 468.2 min, p = 0.004) but less mean blood loss (547.3 vs 1033.0 ml, p < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospitalization time (15.3 vs 22.4 days, p = 0.004). One patient died of pulmonary embolism in the 7th month of follow-up time. One patient died of recurrence in the 12th month of follow-up time. Nine patients are still alive without recurrence and metastasis. The mean follow-up time was 11.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of LTPE seems to be feasible and safe in the treatment of carefully selected patients of pelvic malignancies. LTPE can also decrease the blood loss, the recovery time, and the hospital stay. But the oncological safety and long-term outcome of LTPE still need to be explored.