Cargando…
Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of psychopathological concepts such as depression hampers progress in research and clinical practice. Latent Variable Models (LVMs) have been widely used to reduce this problem by identification of more homogeneous factors or subgroups. However, heterogeneity exists at mult...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26471992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0080-4 |
_version_ | 1782395628786024448 |
---|---|
author | de Vos, Stijn Wardenaar, Klaas J. Bos, Elisabeth H. Wit, Ernst C. de Jonge, Peter |
author_facet | de Vos, Stijn Wardenaar, Klaas J. Bos, Elisabeth H. Wit, Ernst C. de Jonge, Peter |
author_sort | de Vos, Stijn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of psychopathological concepts such as depression hampers progress in research and clinical practice. Latent Variable Models (LVMs) have been widely used to reduce this problem by identification of more homogeneous factors or subgroups. However, heterogeneity exists at multiple levels (persons, symptoms, time) and LVMs cannot capture all these levels and their interactions simultaneously, which leads to incomplete models. Our objective is to briefly review the most widely used LVMs in depression research, illustrating their use and incompatibility in real data, and to consider an alternative, statistical approach, namely multimode principal component analysis (MPCA). METHODS: We applied LVMs to data from 147 patients, who filled out the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) at 9 time points. Compatibility of the results and suitability of the LVMs to capture the heterogeneity of the data were evaluated. Alternatively, MPCA was used to simultaneously decompose depression on the person-, symptom- and time-level and to investigate the interactions between these levels. RESULTS: QIDS-data could be decomposed on the person-level (2 classes), symptom-level (2 factors) and time-level (2 trajectory-classes). However, these results could not be integrated into a single model. Instead, MPCA allowed for decomposition of the data at the person- (3 components), symptom- (2 components) and time-level (2 components) and for the investigation of these components’ interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional LVMs have limited use when trying to define an integrated model of depression heterogeneity at the person, symptom and time level. More integrative statistical techniques such as MPCA can be used to address these relatively complex data patterns and could be used in future attempts to identify empirically-based subtypes/phenotypes of depression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0080-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4608190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46081902015-10-17 Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis de Vos, Stijn Wardenaar, Klaas J. Bos, Elisabeth H. Wit, Ernst C. de Jonge, Peter BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of psychopathological concepts such as depression hampers progress in research and clinical practice. Latent Variable Models (LVMs) have been widely used to reduce this problem by identification of more homogeneous factors or subgroups. However, heterogeneity exists at multiple levels (persons, symptoms, time) and LVMs cannot capture all these levels and their interactions simultaneously, which leads to incomplete models. Our objective is to briefly review the most widely used LVMs in depression research, illustrating their use and incompatibility in real data, and to consider an alternative, statistical approach, namely multimode principal component analysis (MPCA). METHODS: We applied LVMs to data from 147 patients, who filled out the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) at 9 time points. Compatibility of the results and suitability of the LVMs to capture the heterogeneity of the data were evaluated. Alternatively, MPCA was used to simultaneously decompose depression on the person-, symptom- and time-level and to investigate the interactions between these levels. RESULTS: QIDS-data could be decomposed on the person-level (2 classes), symptom-level (2 factors) and time-level (2 trajectory-classes). However, these results could not be integrated into a single model. Instead, MPCA allowed for decomposition of the data at the person- (3 components), symptom- (2 components) and time-level (2 components) and for the investigation of these components’ interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional LVMs have limited use when trying to define an integrated model of depression heterogeneity at the person, symptom and time level. More integrative statistical techniques such as MPCA can be used to address these relatively complex data patterns and could be used in future attempts to identify empirically-based subtypes/phenotypes of depression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0080-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4608190/ /pubmed/26471992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0080-4 Text en © de Vos et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Vos, Stijn Wardenaar, Klaas J. Bos, Elisabeth H. Wit, Ernst C. de Jonge, Peter Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis |
title | Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis |
title_full | Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis |
title_fullStr | Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis |
title_short | Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis |
title_sort | decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26471992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0080-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devosstijn decomposingtheheterogeneityofdepressionatthepersonsymptomandtimelevellatentvariablemodelsversusmultimodeprincipalcomponentanalysis AT wardenaarklaasj decomposingtheheterogeneityofdepressionatthepersonsymptomandtimelevellatentvariablemodelsversusmultimodeprincipalcomponentanalysis AT boselisabethh decomposingtheheterogeneityofdepressionatthepersonsymptomandtimelevellatentvariablemodelsversusmultimodeprincipalcomponentanalysis AT witernstc decomposingtheheterogeneityofdepressionatthepersonsymptomandtimelevellatentvariablemodelsversusmultimodeprincipalcomponentanalysis AT dejongepeter decomposingtheheterogeneityofdepressionatthepersonsymptomandtimelevellatentvariablemodelsversusmultimodeprincipalcomponentanalysis |