Cargando…

Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of psychopathological concepts such as depression hampers progress in research and clinical practice. Latent Variable Models (LVMs) have been widely used to reduce this problem by identification of more homogeneous factors or subgroups. However, heterogeneity exists at mult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Vos, Stijn, Wardenaar, Klaas J., Bos, Elisabeth H., Wit, Ernst C., de Jonge, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26471992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0080-4
_version_ 1782395628786024448
author de Vos, Stijn
Wardenaar, Klaas J.
Bos, Elisabeth H.
Wit, Ernst C.
de Jonge, Peter
author_facet de Vos, Stijn
Wardenaar, Klaas J.
Bos, Elisabeth H.
Wit, Ernst C.
de Jonge, Peter
author_sort de Vos, Stijn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of psychopathological concepts such as depression hampers progress in research and clinical practice. Latent Variable Models (LVMs) have been widely used to reduce this problem by identification of more homogeneous factors or subgroups. However, heterogeneity exists at multiple levels (persons, symptoms, time) and LVMs cannot capture all these levels and their interactions simultaneously, which leads to incomplete models. Our objective is to briefly review the most widely used LVMs in depression research, illustrating their use and incompatibility in real data, and to consider an alternative, statistical approach, namely multimode principal component analysis (MPCA). METHODS: We applied LVMs to data from 147 patients, who filled out the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) at 9 time points. Compatibility of the results and suitability of the LVMs to capture the heterogeneity of the data were evaluated. Alternatively, MPCA was used to simultaneously decompose depression on the person-, symptom- and time-level and to investigate the interactions between these levels. RESULTS: QIDS-data could be decomposed on the person-level (2 classes), symptom-level (2 factors) and time-level (2 trajectory-classes). However, these results could not be integrated into a single model. Instead, MPCA allowed for decomposition of the data at the person- (3 components), symptom- (2 components) and time-level (2 components) and for the investigation of these components’ interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional LVMs have limited use when trying to define an integrated model of depression heterogeneity at the person, symptom and time level. More integrative statistical techniques such as MPCA can be used to address these relatively complex data patterns and could be used in future attempts to identify empirically-based subtypes/phenotypes of depression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0080-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4608190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46081902015-10-17 Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis de Vos, Stijn Wardenaar, Klaas J. Bos, Elisabeth H. Wit, Ernst C. de Jonge, Peter BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of psychopathological concepts such as depression hampers progress in research and clinical practice. Latent Variable Models (LVMs) have been widely used to reduce this problem by identification of more homogeneous factors or subgroups. However, heterogeneity exists at multiple levels (persons, symptoms, time) and LVMs cannot capture all these levels and their interactions simultaneously, which leads to incomplete models. Our objective is to briefly review the most widely used LVMs in depression research, illustrating their use and incompatibility in real data, and to consider an alternative, statistical approach, namely multimode principal component analysis (MPCA). METHODS: We applied LVMs to data from 147 patients, who filled out the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) at 9 time points. Compatibility of the results and suitability of the LVMs to capture the heterogeneity of the data were evaluated. Alternatively, MPCA was used to simultaneously decompose depression on the person-, symptom- and time-level and to investigate the interactions between these levels. RESULTS: QIDS-data could be decomposed on the person-level (2 classes), symptom-level (2 factors) and time-level (2 trajectory-classes). However, these results could not be integrated into a single model. Instead, MPCA allowed for decomposition of the data at the person- (3 components), symptom- (2 components) and time-level (2 components) and for the investigation of these components’ interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional LVMs have limited use when trying to define an integrated model of depression heterogeneity at the person, symptom and time level. More integrative statistical techniques such as MPCA can be used to address these relatively complex data patterns and could be used in future attempts to identify empirically-based subtypes/phenotypes of depression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0080-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4608190/ /pubmed/26471992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0080-4 Text en © de Vos et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Vos, Stijn
Wardenaar, Klaas J.
Bos, Elisabeth H.
Wit, Ernst C.
de Jonge, Peter
Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis
title Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis
title_full Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis
title_fullStr Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis
title_full_unstemmed Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis
title_short Decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis
title_sort decomposing the heterogeneity of depression at the person-, symptom-, and time-level: latent variable models versus multimode principal component analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26471992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0080-4
work_keys_str_mv AT devosstijn decomposingtheheterogeneityofdepressionatthepersonsymptomandtimelevellatentvariablemodelsversusmultimodeprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT wardenaarklaasj decomposingtheheterogeneityofdepressionatthepersonsymptomandtimelevellatentvariablemodelsversusmultimodeprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT boselisabethh decomposingtheheterogeneityofdepressionatthepersonsymptomandtimelevellatentvariablemodelsversusmultimodeprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT witernstc decomposingtheheterogeneityofdepressionatthepersonsymptomandtimelevellatentvariablemodelsversusmultimodeprincipalcomponentanalysis
AT dejongepeter decomposingtheheterogeneityofdepressionatthepersonsymptomandtimelevellatentvariablemodelsversusmultimodeprincipalcomponentanalysis