Cargando…

The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions are often criticised as failing to open the ‘black box’ whereby they only address questions about ‘what works’ without explaining the underlying processes of implementation and mechanisms of action, and how these vary by context...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamal, Farah, Fletcher, Adam, Shackleton, Nichola, Elbourne, Diana, Viner, Russell, Bonell, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26470794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0980-y
_version_ 1782395642888323072
author Jamal, Farah
Fletcher, Adam
Shackleton, Nichola
Elbourne, Diana
Viner, Russell
Bonell, Chris
author_facet Jamal, Farah
Fletcher, Adam
Shackleton, Nichola
Elbourne, Diana
Viner, Russell
Bonell, Chris
author_sort Jamal, Farah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions are often criticised as failing to open the ‘black box’ whereby they only address questions about ‘what works’ without explaining the underlying processes of implementation and mechanisms of action, and how these vary by contextual characteristics of person and place. Realist RCTs are proposed as an approach to evaluation science that addresses these gaps while preserving the strengths of RCTs in providing evidence with strong internal validity in estimating effects. METHODS: In the context of growing interest in designing and conducting realist trials, there is an urgent need to offer a worked example to provide guidance on how such an approach might be practically taken forward. The aim of this paper is to outline a three-staged theoretical and methodological process of undertaking a realist RCT using the example of the evaluation of a whole-school restorative intervention aiming to reduce aggression and bullying in English secondary schools. DISCUSSION: First, informed by the findings of our initial pilot trial and sociological theory, we elaborate our theory of change and specific a priori hypotheses about how intervention mechanisms interact with context to produce outcomes. Second, we describe how we will use emerging findings from the integral process evaluation within the RCT to refine, and add to, these a priori hypotheses before the collection of quantitative, follow-up data. Third, we will test our hypotheses using a combination of process and outcome data via quantitative analyses of effect mediation (examining mechanisms) and moderation (examining contextual contingencies). The results are then used to refine and further develop the theory of change. CONCLUSION: The aim of the realist RCT approach is thus not merely to assess whether the intervention is effective or not, but to develop empirically informed mid-range theory through a three-stage process. There are important implications for those involved with reporting and reviewing RCTs, including the use of new, iterative protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10751359 (Registered 11 March 2014)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4608279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46082792015-10-17 The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example Jamal, Farah Fletcher, Adam Shackleton, Nichola Elbourne, Diana Viner, Russell Bonell, Chris Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions are often criticised as failing to open the ‘black box’ whereby they only address questions about ‘what works’ without explaining the underlying processes of implementation and mechanisms of action, and how these vary by contextual characteristics of person and place. Realist RCTs are proposed as an approach to evaluation science that addresses these gaps while preserving the strengths of RCTs in providing evidence with strong internal validity in estimating effects. METHODS: In the context of growing interest in designing and conducting realist trials, there is an urgent need to offer a worked example to provide guidance on how such an approach might be practically taken forward. The aim of this paper is to outline a three-staged theoretical and methodological process of undertaking a realist RCT using the example of the evaluation of a whole-school restorative intervention aiming to reduce aggression and bullying in English secondary schools. DISCUSSION: First, informed by the findings of our initial pilot trial and sociological theory, we elaborate our theory of change and specific a priori hypotheses about how intervention mechanisms interact with context to produce outcomes. Second, we describe how we will use emerging findings from the integral process evaluation within the RCT to refine, and add to, these a priori hypotheses before the collection of quantitative, follow-up data. Third, we will test our hypotheses using a combination of process and outcome data via quantitative analyses of effect mediation (examining mechanisms) and moderation (examining contextual contingencies). The results are then used to refine and further develop the theory of change. CONCLUSION: The aim of the realist RCT approach is thus not merely to assess whether the intervention is effective or not, but to develop empirically informed mid-range theory through a three-stage process. There are important implications for those involved with reporting and reviewing RCTs, including the use of new, iterative protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10751359 (Registered 11 March 2014) BioMed Central 2015-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4608279/ /pubmed/26470794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0980-y Text en © Jamal et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Jamal, Farah
Fletcher, Adam
Shackleton, Nichola
Elbourne, Diana
Viner, Russell
Bonell, Chris
The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example
title The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example
title_full The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example
title_fullStr The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example
title_full_unstemmed The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example
title_short The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example
title_sort three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist rct: a theoretical and methodological case-example
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26470794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0980-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jamalfarah thethreestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT fletcheradam thethreestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT shackletonnichola thethreestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT elbournediana thethreestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT vinerrussell thethreestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT bonellchris thethreestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT jamalfarah threestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT fletcheradam threestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT shackletonnichola threestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT elbournediana threestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT vinerrussell threestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample
AT bonellchris threestagesofbuildingandtestingmidleveltheoriesinarealistrctatheoreticalandmethodologicalcaseexample