Cargando…

Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training – a prospective observational study from several European EMS

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is important for patient survival. Real time objective feedback during manikin training has been shown to improve CPR performance. Objective measurement could facilitate competition and help motivate p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smart, JR, Kranz, K., Carmona, F., Lindner, TW, Newton, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26471882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0160-9
_version_ 1782395649901199360
author Smart, JR
Kranz, K.
Carmona, F.
Lindner, TW
Newton, A.
author_facet Smart, JR
Kranz, K.
Carmona, F.
Lindner, TW
Newton, A.
author_sort Smart, JR
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is important for patient survival. Real time objective feedback during manikin training has been shown to improve CPR performance. Objective measurement could facilitate competition and help motivate participants to improve their CPR performance. The aims of this study were to investigate whether real time objective feedback on manikins helps improve CPR performance and whether competition between separate European Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and between participants at each EMS helps motivation to train. METHODS: Ten European EMS took part in the study and was carried out in two stages. At Stage 1, each EMS provided 20 pre-hospital professionals. A questionnaire was completed and standardised assessment scenarios were performed for adult and infant out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). CPR performance was objectively measured and recorded but no feedback given. Between Stage 1 and 2, each EMS was given access to manikins for 6 months and instructed on how to use with objective real-time CPR feedback available. Stage 2 was undertaken and was a repeat of Stage 1 with a questionnaire with additional questions relating to usefulness of feedback and the competition nature of the study (using a 10 point Likert score). The EMS that improved the most from Stage 1 to Stage 2 was declared the winner. An independent samples Student t-test was used to analyse the objective CPR metrics with the significance level taken as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Overall mean Improvement of CPR performance from Stage 1 to Stage 2 was significant. The improvement was greater for the infant assessment. The participants thought the real-time feedback very useful (mean score of 8.5) and very easy to use (mean score of 8.2). Competition between EMS organisations recorded a mean score of 5.8 and competition between participants recorded a mean score of 6.0. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the use of real time objective feedback can significantly help improve CPR performance. Competition, especially between participants, appeared to encourage staff to practice and this study suggests that competition might have a useful role to help motivate staff to perform CPR training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4608309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46083092015-10-17 Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training – a prospective observational study from several European EMS Smart, JR Kranz, K. Carmona, F. Lindner, TW Newton, A. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is important for patient survival. Real time objective feedback during manikin training has been shown to improve CPR performance. Objective measurement could facilitate competition and help motivate participants to improve their CPR performance. The aims of this study were to investigate whether real time objective feedback on manikins helps improve CPR performance and whether competition between separate European Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and between participants at each EMS helps motivation to train. METHODS: Ten European EMS took part in the study and was carried out in two stages. At Stage 1, each EMS provided 20 pre-hospital professionals. A questionnaire was completed and standardised assessment scenarios were performed for adult and infant out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). CPR performance was objectively measured and recorded but no feedback given. Between Stage 1 and 2, each EMS was given access to manikins for 6 months and instructed on how to use with objective real-time CPR feedback available. Stage 2 was undertaken and was a repeat of Stage 1 with a questionnaire with additional questions relating to usefulness of feedback and the competition nature of the study (using a 10 point Likert score). The EMS that improved the most from Stage 1 to Stage 2 was declared the winner. An independent samples Student t-test was used to analyse the objective CPR metrics with the significance level taken as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Overall mean Improvement of CPR performance from Stage 1 to Stage 2 was significant. The improvement was greater for the infant assessment. The participants thought the real-time feedback very useful (mean score of 8.5) and very easy to use (mean score of 8.2). Competition between EMS organisations recorded a mean score of 5.8 and competition between participants recorded a mean score of 6.0. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the use of real time objective feedback can significantly help improve CPR performance. Competition, especially between participants, appeared to encourage staff to practice and this study suggests that competition might have a useful role to help motivate staff to perform CPR training. BioMed Central 2015-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4608309/ /pubmed/26471882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0160-9 Text en © Smart et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Smart, JR
Kranz, K.
Carmona, F.
Lindner, TW
Newton, A.
Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training – a prospective observational study from several European EMS
title Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training – a prospective observational study from several European EMS
title_full Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training – a prospective observational study from several European EMS
title_fullStr Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training – a prospective observational study from several European EMS
title_full_unstemmed Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training – a prospective observational study from several European EMS
title_short Does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin CPR training – a prospective observational study from several European EMS
title_sort does real-time objective feedback and competition improve performance and quality in manikin cpr training – a prospective observational study from several european ems
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26471882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0160-9
work_keys_str_mv AT smartjr doesrealtimeobjectivefeedbackandcompetitionimproveperformanceandqualityinmanikincprtrainingaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromseveraleuropeanems
AT kranzk doesrealtimeobjectivefeedbackandcompetitionimproveperformanceandqualityinmanikincprtrainingaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromseveraleuropeanems
AT carmonaf doesrealtimeobjectivefeedbackandcompetitionimproveperformanceandqualityinmanikincprtrainingaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromseveraleuropeanems
AT lindnertw doesrealtimeobjectivefeedbackandcompetitionimproveperformanceandqualityinmanikincprtrainingaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromseveraleuropeanems
AT newtona doesrealtimeobjectivefeedbackandcompetitionimproveperformanceandqualityinmanikincprtrainingaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromseveraleuropeanems