Cargando…

Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography

INTRODUCTION: Both midazolam and promethazine are recommended to be used as sedatives in many studies but each have some side effects that limits their use. Combination therapy as an alternative method, may decreases these limitations. Therefore, this study aimed to compare midazolam with midazolam-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barzegari, Hassan, Zohrevandi, Behzad, Masoumi, Kambiz, Forouzan, Arash, Darian, Ali Asgari, Khosravi, Shaqayeq
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495395
_version_ 1782395655907442688
author Barzegari, Hassan
Zohrevandi, Behzad
Masoumi, Kambiz
Forouzan, Arash
Darian, Ali Asgari
Khosravi, Shaqayeq
author_facet Barzegari, Hassan
Zohrevandi, Behzad
Masoumi, Kambiz
Forouzan, Arash
Darian, Ali Asgari
Khosravi, Shaqayeq
author_sort Barzegari, Hassan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Both midazolam and promethazine are recommended to be used as sedatives in many studies but each have some side effects that limits their use. Combination therapy as an alternative method, may decreases these limitations. Therefore, this study aimed to compare midazolam with midazolam-promethazine regarding induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics following pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia. METHODS: Children under 7 years old who needed sedation for being CT scanned were included in this double-blind randomized clinical trial. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: one only received midazolam (0.5 mg/kg), while the other group received a combination of midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and promethazine (1.25 mg/kg). University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) was used to assess sedation induction. In addition to demographic data, the child’s vital signs were evaluated before prescribing the drugs and after inducing sedation (reaching UMSS level 2). The primary outcomes in the present study were onset of action after administration and duration of the drugs’ effect. RESULTS: 107 patients were included in the study. Mean onset of action was 55.4±20.3 minutes for midazolam and 32.5±11.1 minutes for midazolam-promethazine combination (p<0.001). But duration of effect was not different between the 2 groups (p=0.36). 8 (7.5%) patients were unresponsive to the medication, all 8 of which were in the midazolam treated group (p=0.006). Also in 18 (16.8%) cases a rescue dose was prescribed, 14 (25.9%) were in the midazolam group and 4 (7.5%) were in the midazolam-promethazine group (p=0.02). Comparing systolic (p=0.20) and diastolic (p=0.34) blood pressure, heart rate (p=0.16), respiratory rate (p=0.17) and arterial oxygen saturation level (p=0.91) showed no significant difference between the 2 groups after intervention. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, it seems that using a combination of midazolam and promethazine not only speeds up the sedation induction, but also decreases unresponsiveness to the treatment and the need for a rescue dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4608335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46083352015-10-22 Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography Barzegari, Hassan Zohrevandi, Behzad Masoumi, Kambiz Forouzan, Arash Darian, Ali Asgari Khosravi, Shaqayeq Emerg (Tehran) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Both midazolam and promethazine are recommended to be used as sedatives in many studies but each have some side effects that limits their use. Combination therapy as an alternative method, may decreases these limitations. Therefore, this study aimed to compare midazolam with midazolam-promethazine regarding induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics following pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia. METHODS: Children under 7 years old who needed sedation for being CT scanned were included in this double-blind randomized clinical trial. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: one only received midazolam (0.5 mg/kg), while the other group received a combination of midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and promethazine (1.25 mg/kg). University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) was used to assess sedation induction. In addition to demographic data, the child’s vital signs were evaluated before prescribing the drugs and after inducing sedation (reaching UMSS level 2). The primary outcomes in the present study were onset of action after administration and duration of the drugs’ effect. RESULTS: 107 patients were included in the study. Mean onset of action was 55.4±20.3 minutes for midazolam and 32.5±11.1 minutes for midazolam-promethazine combination (p<0.001). But duration of effect was not different between the 2 groups (p=0.36). 8 (7.5%) patients were unresponsive to the medication, all 8 of which were in the midazolam treated group (p=0.006). Also in 18 (16.8%) cases a rescue dose was prescribed, 14 (25.9%) were in the midazolam group and 4 (7.5%) were in the midazolam-promethazine group (p=0.02). Comparing systolic (p=0.20) and diastolic (p=0.34) blood pressure, heart rate (p=0.16), respiratory rate (p=0.17) and arterial oxygen saturation level (p=0.91) showed no significant difference between the 2 groups after intervention. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of this study, it seems that using a combination of midazolam and promethazine not only speeds up the sedation induction, but also decreases unresponsiveness to the treatment and the need for a rescue dose. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4608335/ /pubmed/26495395 Text en Copyright © 2015 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. This open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0)., (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Barzegari, Hassan
Zohrevandi, Behzad
Masoumi, Kambiz
Forouzan, Arash
Darian, Ali Asgari
Khosravi, Shaqayeq
Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography
title Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography
title_full Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography
title_short Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography
title_sort comparison of oral midazolam and promethazine with oral midazolam alone for sedating children during computed tomography
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4608335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495395
work_keys_str_mv AT barzegarihassan comparisonoforalmidazolamandpromethazinewithoralmidazolamaloneforsedatingchildrenduringcomputedtomography
AT zohrevandibehzad comparisonoforalmidazolamandpromethazinewithoralmidazolamaloneforsedatingchildrenduringcomputedtomography
AT masoumikambiz comparisonoforalmidazolamandpromethazinewithoralmidazolamaloneforsedatingchildrenduringcomputedtomography
AT forouzanarash comparisonoforalmidazolamandpromethazinewithoralmidazolamaloneforsedatingchildrenduringcomputedtomography
AT darianaliasgari comparisonoforalmidazolamandpromethazinewithoralmidazolamaloneforsedatingchildrenduringcomputedtomography
AT khosravishaqayeq comparisonoforalmidazolamandpromethazinewithoralmidazolamaloneforsedatingchildrenduringcomputedtomography