Cargando…
State of the art of current 3-D scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective
Scoliosis is a complex three dimensional (3D) deformity: the current lack of a 3D classification could hide something fundamental for scoliosis prognosis and treatment. A clear picture of the actually existing 3D classifications lacks. The aim of this systematic review was to identify all the 3D cla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0083-8 |
_version_ | 1782395755101683712 |
---|---|
author | Donzelli, Sabrina Poma, Salvatore Balzarini, Luca Borboni, Alberto Respizzi, Stefano Villafane, Jorge Hugo Zaina, Fabio Negrini, Stefano |
author_facet | Donzelli, Sabrina Poma, Salvatore Balzarini, Luca Borboni, Alberto Respizzi, Stefano Villafane, Jorge Hugo Zaina, Fabio Negrini, Stefano |
author_sort | Donzelli, Sabrina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Scoliosis is a complex three dimensional (3D) deformity: the current lack of a 3D classification could hide something fundamental for scoliosis prognosis and treatment. A clear picture of the actually existing 3D classifications lacks. The aim of this systematic review was to identify all the 3D classification systems proposed until now in the literature with the aim to identify similarities and differences mainly in a clinical perspective. After a MEDLINE Data Base review, done in November 2013 using the search terms “Scoliosis/classification” [Mesh] and “scoliosis/classification and Imaging, three dimensional” [Mesh], 8 papers were included with a total of 1164 scoliosis patients, 23 hyperkyphosis and 25 controls, aged between 8 and 20 years, with curves from 10° to 81° Cobb, and various curve patterns. Six studies looked at the whole 3D spine and found classificatory parameters according to planes, angles and rotations, including: Plane of Maximal Curvature (PMC), Best Fit Plane, Cobb angles in bodily plane and PMC, Axial rotation of the apical vertebra and of the PMC, and geometric 3D torsion. Two studies used the regional (spinal) Top View of the spine and found classificatory parameters according to its geometrical properties (area, direction and barycenter) including: Ratio of the frontal and the sagittal size, Phase, Directions (total, thoracic and lumbar), and Shift. It was possible to find similarities among 10 out of the 16 the sub-groups identified by different authors with different methods in different populations. In summation, the state of the art of 3D classification systems include 8 studies which showed some comparability, even though of low level. The most useful one in clinical everyday practice, is far from being defined. More than 20 years passed since the definition of the third dimension of the scoliosis deformity, now the time has come for clinicians and bioengineers to start some real clinical application, and develop means to make this approach an everyday tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4609046 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46090462015-10-18 State of the art of current 3-D scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective Donzelli, Sabrina Poma, Salvatore Balzarini, Luca Borboni, Alberto Respizzi, Stefano Villafane, Jorge Hugo Zaina, Fabio Negrini, Stefano J Neuroeng Rehabil Review Scoliosis is a complex three dimensional (3D) deformity: the current lack of a 3D classification could hide something fundamental for scoliosis prognosis and treatment. A clear picture of the actually existing 3D classifications lacks. The aim of this systematic review was to identify all the 3D classification systems proposed until now in the literature with the aim to identify similarities and differences mainly in a clinical perspective. After a MEDLINE Data Base review, done in November 2013 using the search terms “Scoliosis/classification” [Mesh] and “scoliosis/classification and Imaging, three dimensional” [Mesh], 8 papers were included with a total of 1164 scoliosis patients, 23 hyperkyphosis and 25 controls, aged between 8 and 20 years, with curves from 10° to 81° Cobb, and various curve patterns. Six studies looked at the whole 3D spine and found classificatory parameters according to planes, angles and rotations, including: Plane of Maximal Curvature (PMC), Best Fit Plane, Cobb angles in bodily plane and PMC, Axial rotation of the apical vertebra and of the PMC, and geometric 3D torsion. Two studies used the regional (spinal) Top View of the spine and found classificatory parameters according to its geometrical properties (area, direction and barycenter) including: Ratio of the frontal and the sagittal size, Phase, Directions (total, thoracic and lumbar), and Shift. It was possible to find similarities among 10 out of the 16 the sub-groups identified by different authors with different methods in different populations. In summation, the state of the art of 3D classification systems include 8 studies which showed some comparability, even though of low level. The most useful one in clinical everyday practice, is far from being defined. More than 20 years passed since the definition of the third dimension of the scoliosis deformity, now the time has come for clinicians and bioengineers to start some real clinical application, and develop means to make this approach an everyday tool. BioMed Central 2015-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4609046/ /pubmed/26475324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0083-8 Text en © Donzelli et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Donzelli, Sabrina Poma, Salvatore Balzarini, Luca Borboni, Alberto Respizzi, Stefano Villafane, Jorge Hugo Zaina, Fabio Negrini, Stefano State of the art of current 3-D scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective |
title | State of the art of current 3-D scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective |
title_full | State of the art of current 3-D scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective |
title_fullStr | State of the art of current 3-D scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | State of the art of current 3-D scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective |
title_short | State of the art of current 3-D scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective |
title_sort | state of the art of current 3-d scoliosis classifications: a systematic review from a clinical perspective |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0083-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donzellisabrina stateoftheartofcurrent3dscoliosisclassificationsasystematicreviewfromaclinicalperspective AT pomasalvatore stateoftheartofcurrent3dscoliosisclassificationsasystematicreviewfromaclinicalperspective AT balzariniluca stateoftheartofcurrent3dscoliosisclassificationsasystematicreviewfromaclinicalperspective AT borbonialberto stateoftheartofcurrent3dscoliosisclassificationsasystematicreviewfromaclinicalperspective AT respizzistefano stateoftheartofcurrent3dscoliosisclassificationsasystematicreviewfromaclinicalperspective AT villafanejorgehugo stateoftheartofcurrent3dscoliosisclassificationsasystematicreviewfromaclinicalperspective AT zainafabio stateoftheartofcurrent3dscoliosisclassificationsasystematicreviewfromaclinicalperspective AT negrinistefano stateoftheartofcurrent3dscoliosisclassificationsasystematicreviewfromaclinicalperspective |