Cargando…

Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model

BACKGROUND: Myocardial cavitation-enabled therapy (MCET) has been proposed as a means to achieve minimally invasive myocardial reduction using ultrasound to produce scattered microlesions by cavitating contrast agent microbubbles. METHODS: Rats were treated using burst mode focused ultrasound at 1.5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Yiying I., Miller, Douglas L., Dou, Chunyan, Lu, Xiaofang, Kripfgans, Oliver D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-015-0039-2
_version_ 1782395761059692544
author Zhu, Yiying I.
Miller, Douglas L.
Dou, Chunyan
Lu, Xiaofang
Kripfgans, Oliver D.
author_facet Zhu, Yiying I.
Miller, Douglas L.
Dou, Chunyan
Lu, Xiaofang
Kripfgans, Oliver D.
author_sort Zhu, Yiying I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Myocardial cavitation-enabled therapy (MCET) has been proposed as a means to achieve minimally invasive myocardial reduction using ultrasound to produce scattered microlesions by cavitating contrast agent microbubbles. METHODS: Rats were treated using burst mode focused ultrasound at 1.5 MHz center frequency and varying envelope and pressure amplitudes. Evans blue staining indicated lethal cardiomyocytic injury. A previously developed quantitative scheme, evaluating the histologic treatment results, provides an insightful analysis for MCET treatment parameters. Such include ultrasound exposure amplitude and pulse modulation, contrast agent dose, and infusion rate. RESULTS: The quantitative method overcomes the limitation of visual scoring and works for a large dynamic range of treatment impact. Macrolesions are generated as an accumulation of probability driven microlesion formations. Macrolesions grow radially with radii from 0.1 to 1.6 mm as the ultrasound exposure amplitude (peak negative) increases from 2 to 4 MPa. To shorten treatment time, a swept beam was investigated and found to generate an acceptable macrolesion volume of about 40 μL for a single beam position. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound parameters and administration of microbubbles directly influence lesion characteristics such as microlesion density and macrolesion dimension. For lesion generation planning, control of MCET is crucial, especially when targeting larger pre-clinical models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4609072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46090722015-10-18 Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model Zhu, Yiying I. Miller, Douglas L. Dou, Chunyan Lu, Xiaofang Kripfgans, Oliver D. J Ther Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Myocardial cavitation-enabled therapy (MCET) has been proposed as a means to achieve minimally invasive myocardial reduction using ultrasound to produce scattered microlesions by cavitating contrast agent microbubbles. METHODS: Rats were treated using burst mode focused ultrasound at 1.5 MHz center frequency and varying envelope and pressure amplitudes. Evans blue staining indicated lethal cardiomyocytic injury. A previously developed quantitative scheme, evaluating the histologic treatment results, provides an insightful analysis for MCET treatment parameters. Such include ultrasound exposure amplitude and pulse modulation, contrast agent dose, and infusion rate. RESULTS: The quantitative method overcomes the limitation of visual scoring and works for a large dynamic range of treatment impact. Macrolesions are generated as an accumulation of probability driven microlesion formations. Macrolesions grow radially with radii from 0.1 to 1.6 mm as the ultrasound exposure amplitude (peak negative) increases from 2 to 4 MPa. To shorten treatment time, a swept beam was investigated and found to generate an acceptable macrolesion volume of about 40 μL for a single beam position. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound parameters and administration of microbubbles directly influence lesion characteristics such as microlesion density and macrolesion dimension. For lesion generation planning, control of MCET is crucial, especially when targeting larger pre-clinical models. BioMed Central 2015-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4609072/ /pubmed/26478815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-015-0039-2 Text en © Zhu et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zhu, Yiying I.
Miller, Douglas L.
Dou, Chunyan
Lu, Xiaofang
Kripfgans, Oliver D.
Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model
title Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model
title_full Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model
title_fullStr Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model
title_short Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model
title_sort quantitative assessment of damage during mcet: a parametric study in a rodent model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-015-0039-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuyiyingi quantitativeassessmentofdamageduringmcetaparametricstudyinarodentmodel
AT millerdouglasl quantitativeassessmentofdamageduringmcetaparametricstudyinarodentmodel
AT douchunyan quantitativeassessmentofdamageduringmcetaparametricstudyinarodentmodel
AT luxiaofang quantitativeassessmentofdamageduringmcetaparametricstudyinarodentmodel
AT kripfgansoliverd quantitativeassessmentofdamageduringmcetaparametricstudyinarodentmodel