Cargando…
Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model
BACKGROUND: Myocardial cavitation-enabled therapy (MCET) has been proposed as a means to achieve minimally invasive myocardial reduction using ultrasound to produce scattered microlesions by cavitating contrast agent microbubbles. METHODS: Rats were treated using burst mode focused ultrasound at 1.5...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-015-0039-2 |
_version_ | 1782395761059692544 |
---|---|
author | Zhu, Yiying I. Miller, Douglas L. Dou, Chunyan Lu, Xiaofang Kripfgans, Oliver D. |
author_facet | Zhu, Yiying I. Miller, Douglas L. Dou, Chunyan Lu, Xiaofang Kripfgans, Oliver D. |
author_sort | Zhu, Yiying I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Myocardial cavitation-enabled therapy (MCET) has been proposed as a means to achieve minimally invasive myocardial reduction using ultrasound to produce scattered microlesions by cavitating contrast agent microbubbles. METHODS: Rats were treated using burst mode focused ultrasound at 1.5 MHz center frequency and varying envelope and pressure amplitudes. Evans blue staining indicated lethal cardiomyocytic injury. A previously developed quantitative scheme, evaluating the histologic treatment results, provides an insightful analysis for MCET treatment parameters. Such include ultrasound exposure amplitude and pulse modulation, contrast agent dose, and infusion rate. RESULTS: The quantitative method overcomes the limitation of visual scoring and works for a large dynamic range of treatment impact. Macrolesions are generated as an accumulation of probability driven microlesion formations. Macrolesions grow radially with radii from 0.1 to 1.6 mm as the ultrasound exposure amplitude (peak negative) increases from 2 to 4 MPa. To shorten treatment time, a swept beam was investigated and found to generate an acceptable macrolesion volume of about 40 μL for a single beam position. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound parameters and administration of microbubbles directly influence lesion characteristics such as microlesion density and macrolesion dimension. For lesion generation planning, control of MCET is crucial, especially when targeting larger pre-clinical models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4609072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46090722015-10-18 Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model Zhu, Yiying I. Miller, Douglas L. Dou, Chunyan Lu, Xiaofang Kripfgans, Oliver D. J Ther Ultrasound Research BACKGROUND: Myocardial cavitation-enabled therapy (MCET) has been proposed as a means to achieve minimally invasive myocardial reduction using ultrasound to produce scattered microlesions by cavitating contrast agent microbubbles. METHODS: Rats were treated using burst mode focused ultrasound at 1.5 MHz center frequency and varying envelope and pressure amplitudes. Evans blue staining indicated lethal cardiomyocytic injury. A previously developed quantitative scheme, evaluating the histologic treatment results, provides an insightful analysis for MCET treatment parameters. Such include ultrasound exposure amplitude and pulse modulation, contrast agent dose, and infusion rate. RESULTS: The quantitative method overcomes the limitation of visual scoring and works for a large dynamic range of treatment impact. Macrolesions are generated as an accumulation of probability driven microlesion formations. Macrolesions grow radially with radii from 0.1 to 1.6 mm as the ultrasound exposure amplitude (peak negative) increases from 2 to 4 MPa. To shorten treatment time, a swept beam was investigated and found to generate an acceptable macrolesion volume of about 40 μL for a single beam position. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound parameters and administration of microbubbles directly influence lesion characteristics such as microlesion density and macrolesion dimension. For lesion generation planning, control of MCET is crucial, especially when targeting larger pre-clinical models. BioMed Central 2015-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4609072/ /pubmed/26478815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-015-0039-2 Text en © Zhu et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhu, Yiying I. Miller, Douglas L. Dou, Chunyan Lu, Xiaofang Kripfgans, Oliver D. Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model |
title | Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model |
title_full | Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model |
title_fullStr | Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model |
title_short | Quantitative assessment of damage during MCET: a parametric study in a rodent model |
title_sort | quantitative assessment of damage during mcet: a parametric study in a rodent model |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26478815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40349-015-0039-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhuyiyingi quantitativeassessmentofdamageduringmcetaparametricstudyinarodentmodel AT millerdouglasl quantitativeassessmentofdamageduringmcetaparametricstudyinarodentmodel AT douchunyan quantitativeassessmentofdamageduringmcetaparametricstudyinarodentmodel AT luxiaofang quantitativeassessmentofdamageduringmcetaparametricstudyinarodentmodel AT kripfgansoliverd quantitativeassessmentofdamageduringmcetaparametricstudyinarodentmodel |