Cargando…

Understanding how residents’ preferences for supervisory methods change throughout residency training: a mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: A major challenge for clinical supervisors is to encourage their residents to be independent without jeopardising patient safety. Residents’ preferences according to level of training on this regard have not been completely explored. This study has sought to investigate which teaching me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olmos-Vega, Francisco, Dolmans, Diana, Donkers, Jeroen, Stalmeijer, Renée E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0462-7
_version_ 1782395773687693312
author Olmos-Vega, Francisco
Dolmans, Diana
Donkers, Jeroen
Stalmeijer, Renée E.
author_facet Olmos-Vega, Francisco
Dolmans, Diana
Donkers, Jeroen
Stalmeijer, Renée E.
author_sort Olmos-Vega, Francisco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A major challenge for clinical supervisors is to encourage their residents to be independent without jeopardising patient safety. Residents’ preferences according to level of training on this regard have not been completely explored. This study has sought to investigate which teaching methods of the Cognitive Apprenticeship (CA) model junior, intermediate and senior residents preferred and why, and how these preferences differed between groups. METHODS: We invited 301 residents of all residency programmes of Javeriana University, Bogotá, Colombia, to participate. Each resident was asked to complete a Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ), which, being based on the teaching methods of CA, asked residents to rate the importance to their learning of each teaching method and to indicate which of these they preferred the most and why. RESULTS: A total of 215 residents (71 %) completed the questionnaire. All concurred that all CA teaching methods were important or very important to their learning, regardless of their level of training. However, the reasons for their preferences clearly differed between groups: junior and intermediate residents preferred teaching methods that were more supervisor-directed, such as modelling and coaching, whereas senior residents preferred teaching methods that were more resident-directed, such as exploration and articulation. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that clinical supervision (CS) should accommodate to residents’ varying degrees of development by attuning the configuration of CA teaching methods to each level of residency training. This configuration should initially vest more power in the supervisor, and gradually let the resident take charge, without ever discontinuing CS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0462-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4609127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46091272015-10-18 Understanding how residents’ preferences for supervisory methods change throughout residency training: a mixed-methods study Olmos-Vega, Francisco Dolmans, Diana Donkers, Jeroen Stalmeijer, Renée E. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: A major challenge for clinical supervisors is to encourage their residents to be independent without jeopardising patient safety. Residents’ preferences according to level of training on this regard have not been completely explored. This study has sought to investigate which teaching methods of the Cognitive Apprenticeship (CA) model junior, intermediate and senior residents preferred and why, and how these preferences differed between groups. METHODS: We invited 301 residents of all residency programmes of Javeriana University, Bogotá, Colombia, to participate. Each resident was asked to complete a Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ), which, being based on the teaching methods of CA, asked residents to rate the importance to their learning of each teaching method and to indicate which of these they preferred the most and why. RESULTS: A total of 215 residents (71 %) completed the questionnaire. All concurred that all CA teaching methods were important or very important to their learning, regardless of their level of training. However, the reasons for their preferences clearly differed between groups: junior and intermediate residents preferred teaching methods that were more supervisor-directed, such as modelling and coaching, whereas senior residents preferred teaching methods that were more resident-directed, such as exploration and articulation. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that clinical supervision (CS) should accommodate to residents’ varying degrees of development by attuning the configuration of CA teaching methods to each level of residency training. This configuration should initially vest more power in the supervisor, and gradually let the resident take charge, without ever discontinuing CS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0462-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4609127/ /pubmed/26475161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0462-7 Text en © Olmos-Vega et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olmos-Vega, Francisco
Dolmans, Diana
Donkers, Jeroen
Stalmeijer, Renée E.
Understanding how residents’ preferences for supervisory methods change throughout residency training: a mixed-methods study
title Understanding how residents’ preferences for supervisory methods change throughout residency training: a mixed-methods study
title_full Understanding how residents’ preferences for supervisory methods change throughout residency training: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Understanding how residents’ preferences for supervisory methods change throughout residency training: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding how residents’ preferences for supervisory methods change throughout residency training: a mixed-methods study
title_short Understanding how residents’ preferences for supervisory methods change throughout residency training: a mixed-methods study
title_sort understanding how residents’ preferences for supervisory methods change throughout residency training: a mixed-methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0462-7
work_keys_str_mv AT olmosvegafrancisco understandinghowresidentspreferencesforsupervisorymethodschangethroughoutresidencytrainingamixedmethodsstudy
AT dolmansdiana understandinghowresidentspreferencesforsupervisorymethodschangethroughoutresidencytrainingamixedmethodsstudy
AT donkersjeroen understandinghowresidentspreferencesforsupervisorymethodschangethroughoutresidencytrainingamixedmethodsstudy
AT stalmeijerreneee understandinghowresidentspreferencesforsupervisorymethodschangethroughoutresidencytrainingamixedmethodsstudy