Cargando…

Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care – a scoping review

BACKGROUND: The scenario technique is a method for future research and for strategic planning. Today, it includes both qualitative and quantitative elements. The aims of this scoping review are to give an overview of the application of the scenario method in the fields of health care and to make sug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vollmar, Horst Christian, Ostermann, Thomas, Redaèlli, Marcus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0083-1
_version_ 1782395778612854784
author Vollmar, Horst Christian
Ostermann, Thomas
Redaèlli, Marcus
author_facet Vollmar, Horst Christian
Ostermann, Thomas
Redaèlli, Marcus
author_sort Vollmar, Horst Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The scenario technique is a method for future research and for strategic planning. Today, it includes both qualitative and quantitative elements. The aims of this scoping review are to give an overview of the application of the scenario method in the fields of health care and to make suggestions for better reporting in future scenario projects. METHODS: Between January 2013 and October 2013 we conducted a systematic search in the databases Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Eric, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cinahl since inception for the term ‘scenario(s)’ in combination with other terms, e.g. method, model, and technique. Our search was not restricted by date or language. In addition, we screened the reference lists of the included articles. RESULTS: A total of 576 bibliographical records were screened. After removing duplicates and three rounds of screening, 41 articles covering 38 different scenario projects were included for the final analysis. Nine of the included articles addressed disease related issues, led by mental health and dementia (n = 4), and followed by cancer (n = 3). Five scenario projects focused on public health issues at an organizational level and five focused on the labor market for different health care professionals. In addition, four projects dealt with health care ‘in general’, four with the field of biotechnology and personalized medicine, and additional four with other technology developments. Some of the scenario projects suffered from poor reporting of methodological aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its potential, use of the scenario method seems to be published rarely in comparison to other methods such as the Delphi-technique, at least in the field of health care. This might be due to the complexity of the methodological approach. Individual project methods and activities vary widely and are poorly reported. Improved criteria are required for reporting of scenario project methods. With improved standards and greater transparency, the scenario method will be a good tool for scientific health care planning and strategic decision-making in public health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0083-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4609149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46091492015-10-18 Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care – a scoping review Vollmar, Horst Christian Ostermann, Thomas Redaèlli, Marcus BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The scenario technique is a method for future research and for strategic planning. Today, it includes both qualitative and quantitative elements. The aims of this scoping review are to give an overview of the application of the scenario method in the fields of health care and to make suggestions for better reporting in future scenario projects. METHODS: Between January 2013 and October 2013 we conducted a systematic search in the databases Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Eric, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cinahl since inception for the term ‘scenario(s)’ in combination with other terms, e.g. method, model, and technique. Our search was not restricted by date or language. In addition, we screened the reference lists of the included articles. RESULTS: A total of 576 bibliographical records were screened. After removing duplicates and three rounds of screening, 41 articles covering 38 different scenario projects were included for the final analysis. Nine of the included articles addressed disease related issues, led by mental health and dementia (n = 4), and followed by cancer (n = 3). Five scenario projects focused on public health issues at an organizational level and five focused on the labor market for different health care professionals. In addition, four projects dealt with health care ‘in general’, four with the field of biotechnology and personalized medicine, and additional four with other technology developments. Some of the scenario projects suffered from poor reporting of methodological aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its potential, use of the scenario method seems to be published rarely in comparison to other methods such as the Delphi-technique, at least in the field of health care. This might be due to the complexity of the methodological approach. Individual project methods and activities vary widely and are poorly reported. Improved criteria are required for reporting of scenario project methods. With improved standards and greater transparency, the scenario method will be a good tool for scientific health care planning and strategic decision-making in public health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0083-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4609149/ /pubmed/26475601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0083-1 Text en © Vollmar et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vollmar, Horst Christian
Ostermann, Thomas
Redaèlli, Marcus
Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care – a scoping review
title Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care – a scoping review
title_full Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care – a scoping review
title_fullStr Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care – a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care – a scoping review
title_short Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care – a scoping review
title_sort using the scenario method in the context of health and health care – a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0083-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vollmarhorstchristian usingthescenariomethodinthecontextofhealthandhealthcareascopingreview
AT ostermannthomas usingthescenariomethodinthecontextofhealthandhealthcareascopingreview
AT redaellimarcus usingthescenariomethodinthecontextofhealthandhealthcareascopingreview