Cargando…

Social Cognitive Mediators of Sociodemographic Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake

Background. This study examined if and how sociodemographic differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake can be explained by social cognitive factors. Methods. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with individuals aged 60–70 years (n = 1309) living in England as part of a population-bas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lo, Siu Hing, Waller, Jo, Vrinten, Charlotte, Kobayashi, Lindsay, von Wagner, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/165074
_version_ 1782395793173381120
author Lo, Siu Hing
Waller, Jo
Vrinten, Charlotte
Kobayashi, Lindsay
von Wagner, Christian
author_facet Lo, Siu Hing
Waller, Jo
Vrinten, Charlotte
Kobayashi, Lindsay
von Wagner, Christian
author_sort Lo, Siu Hing
collection PubMed
description Background. This study examined if and how sociodemographic differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake can be explained by social cognitive factors. Methods. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with individuals aged 60–70 years (n = 1309) living in England as part of a population-based omnibus survey. Results. There were differences in screening uptake by SES, marital status, ethnicity, and age but not by gender. Perceived barriers (stand. b = −0.40, p < 0.001), social norms (stand. b = 0.33, p < 0.001), and screening knowledge (stand. b = 0.17, p < 0.001) had independent associations with uptake. SES differences in uptake were mediated through knowledge, social norms, and perceived barriers. Ethnic differences were mediated through knowledge. Differences in uptake by marital status were primarily mediated through social norms and to a lesser extent through knowledge. Age differences were largely unmediated, except for a small mediated effect via social norms. Conclusions. Sociodemographic differences in CRC screening uptake were largely mediated through social cognitive factors. Impact. Our findings suggest that multifaceted interventions might be needed to reduce socioeconomic inequalities. Ethnic differences might be reduced through improved screening knowledge. Normative interventions could emphasise screening as an activity endorsed by important others outside the immediate family to appeal to a wider audience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4609345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46093452015-10-26 Social Cognitive Mediators of Sociodemographic Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Lo, Siu Hing Waller, Jo Vrinten, Charlotte Kobayashi, Lindsay von Wagner, Christian Biomed Res Int Research Article Background. This study examined if and how sociodemographic differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake can be explained by social cognitive factors. Methods. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with individuals aged 60–70 years (n = 1309) living in England as part of a population-based omnibus survey. Results. There were differences in screening uptake by SES, marital status, ethnicity, and age but not by gender. Perceived barriers (stand. b = −0.40, p < 0.001), social norms (stand. b = 0.33, p < 0.001), and screening knowledge (stand. b = 0.17, p < 0.001) had independent associations with uptake. SES differences in uptake were mediated through knowledge, social norms, and perceived barriers. Ethnic differences were mediated through knowledge. Differences in uptake by marital status were primarily mediated through social norms and to a lesser extent through knowledge. Age differences were largely unmediated, except for a small mediated effect via social norms. Conclusions. Sociodemographic differences in CRC screening uptake were largely mediated through social cognitive factors. Impact. Our findings suggest that multifaceted interventions might be needed to reduce socioeconomic inequalities. Ethnic differences might be reduced through improved screening knowledge. Normative interventions could emphasise screening as an activity endorsed by important others outside the immediate family to appeal to a wider audience. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4609345/ /pubmed/26504782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/165074 Text en Copyright © 2015 Siu Hing Lo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lo, Siu Hing
Waller, Jo
Vrinten, Charlotte
Kobayashi, Lindsay
von Wagner, Christian
Social Cognitive Mediators of Sociodemographic Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake
title Social Cognitive Mediators of Sociodemographic Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake
title_full Social Cognitive Mediators of Sociodemographic Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake
title_fullStr Social Cognitive Mediators of Sociodemographic Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake
title_full_unstemmed Social Cognitive Mediators of Sociodemographic Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake
title_short Social Cognitive Mediators of Sociodemographic Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake
title_sort social cognitive mediators of sociodemographic differences in colorectal cancer screening uptake
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/165074
work_keys_str_mv AT losiuhing socialcognitivemediatorsofsociodemographicdifferencesincolorectalcancerscreeninguptake
AT wallerjo socialcognitivemediatorsofsociodemographicdifferencesincolorectalcancerscreeninguptake
AT vrintencharlotte socialcognitivemediatorsofsociodemographicdifferencesincolorectalcancerscreeninguptake
AT kobayashilindsay socialcognitivemediatorsofsociodemographicdifferencesincolorectalcancerscreeninguptake
AT vonwagnerchristian socialcognitivemediatorsofsociodemographicdifferencesincolorectalcancerscreeninguptake