Cargando…
Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal Cancer
Background. Worldwide, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and second most common in women. It is the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality. In the United States, CRC is the third most common cause of cancer and second most common cause of cancer mortality. Incidenc...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/326728 |
_version_ | 1782395797208301568 |
---|---|
author | Sovich, Justin L. Sartor, Zachary Misra, Subhasis |
author_facet | Sovich, Justin L. Sartor, Zachary Misra, Subhasis |
author_sort | Sovich, Justin L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Worldwide, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and second most common in women. It is the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality. In the United States, CRC is the third most common cause of cancer and second most common cause of cancer mortality. Incidence and mortality rates have steadily fallen, primarily due to widespread screening. Methods. We conducted keyword searches on PubMed in four categories of CRC screening: stool, endoscopic, radiologic, and serum, as well as news searches in Medscape and Google News. Results. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for CRC screening and the most common method in the United States. Technological improvements continue to be made, including the promising “third-eye retroscope.” Fecal occult blood remains widely used, particularly outside the United States. The first at-home screen, a fecal DNA screen, has also recently been approved. Radiological methods are effective but seldom used due to cost and other factors. Serum tests are largely experimental, although at least one is moving closer to market. Conclusions. Colonoscopy is likely to remain the most popular screening modality for the immediate future, although its shortcomings will continue to spur innovation in a variety of modalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4609363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46093632015-10-26 Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Sovich, Justin L. Sartor, Zachary Misra, Subhasis Biomed Res Int Review Article Background. Worldwide, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and second most common in women. It is the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality. In the United States, CRC is the third most common cause of cancer and second most common cause of cancer mortality. Incidence and mortality rates have steadily fallen, primarily due to widespread screening. Methods. We conducted keyword searches on PubMed in four categories of CRC screening: stool, endoscopic, radiologic, and serum, as well as news searches in Medscape and Google News. Results. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for CRC screening and the most common method in the United States. Technological improvements continue to be made, including the promising “third-eye retroscope.” Fecal occult blood remains widely used, particularly outside the United States. The first at-home screen, a fecal DNA screen, has also recently been approved. Radiological methods are effective but seldom used due to cost and other factors. Serum tests are largely experimental, although at least one is moving closer to market. Conclusions. Colonoscopy is likely to remain the most popular screening modality for the immediate future, although its shortcomings will continue to spur innovation in a variety of modalities. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4609363/ /pubmed/26504799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/326728 Text en Copyright © 2015 Justin L. Sovich et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Sovich, Justin L. Sartor, Zachary Misra, Subhasis Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal Cancer |
title | Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal Cancer |
title_full | Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal Cancer |
title_short | Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal Cancer |
title_sort | developments in screening tests and strategies for colorectal cancer |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/326728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sovichjustinl developmentsinscreeningtestsandstrategiesforcolorectalcancer AT sartorzachary developmentsinscreeningtestsandstrategiesforcolorectalcancer AT misrasubhasis developmentsinscreeningtestsandstrategiesforcolorectalcancer |