Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Methods to Induce Myocardial Infarction in a Closed-Chest Rabbit Model

Objective. To develop a rabbit model of closed-chest catheter-induced myocardial infarction. Background. Limitations of rodent and large animal models justify the search for clinically relevant alternatives. Methods. Microcatheterization of the heart was performed in 47 anesthetized 3-4 kg New Zeala...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isorni, Marc-Antoine, Casanova, Amaury, Piquet, Julie, Bellamy, Valérie, Pignon, Charly, Puymirat, Etienne, Menasche, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/893051
_version_ 1782395800139071488
author Isorni, Marc-Antoine
Casanova, Amaury
Piquet, Julie
Bellamy, Valérie
Pignon, Charly
Puymirat, Etienne
Menasche, Philippe
author_facet Isorni, Marc-Antoine
Casanova, Amaury
Piquet, Julie
Bellamy, Valérie
Pignon, Charly
Puymirat, Etienne
Menasche, Philippe
author_sort Isorni, Marc-Antoine
collection PubMed
description Objective. To develop a rabbit model of closed-chest catheter-induced myocardial infarction. Background. Limitations of rodent and large animal models justify the search for clinically relevant alternatives. Methods. Microcatheterization of the heart was performed in 47 anesthetized 3-4 kg New Zealand rabbits to test five techniques of myocardial ischemia: free coils (n = 4), interlocking coils (n = 4), thrombogenic gelatin sponge (n = 4), balloon occlusion (n = 4), and alcohol injection (n = 8). In order to limit ventricular fibrillation, an antiarrhythmic protocol was implemented, with beta-blockers/amiodarone before and xylocaine infusion during the procedure. Clinical, angiographic, and echographic data were gathered. End points included demonstration of vessel occlusion (TIMI flow grades 0 and 1 on the angiogram), impairment of left ventricular function at 2 weeks after procedure (by echocardiography), and pathologically confirmed myocardial infarction. Results. The best arterial access was determined to be through the right carotid artery. The internal mammary guiding catheter 4-Fr was selected as the optimal device for selective intracoronary injection. Free coils deployed prematurely and tended to prolapse into the aorta. Interlocking coils did not deploy completely and failed to provide reliable results. Gelatin sponge was difficult to handle, adhered to the catheter, and could not be clearly visualized by fluoroscopy. Balloon occlusion yielded inconsistent results. Alcohol injection was the most efficient and reproducible method for inducing myocardial infarction (4 out of 6 animals), the extent of which could be fine-tuned by using a coaxial balloon catheter as a microcatheter (0.52 mm) to achieve a superselective injection of 0.2 mL of alcohol. This approach resulted in a 20% decrease in LVEF and infarcted myocardium was confirmed histologically. Conclusions. By following a stepwise approach, a minimally invasive, effective, and reproducible rabbit model of catheter-induced myocardial infarction has been developed which addresses the limitations of rodent experiments while avoiding the logistical and cost issues associated with large animal models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4609376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46093762015-10-26 Comparative Analysis of Methods to Induce Myocardial Infarction in a Closed-Chest Rabbit Model Isorni, Marc-Antoine Casanova, Amaury Piquet, Julie Bellamy, Valérie Pignon, Charly Puymirat, Etienne Menasche, Philippe Biomed Res Int Research Article Objective. To develop a rabbit model of closed-chest catheter-induced myocardial infarction. Background. Limitations of rodent and large animal models justify the search for clinically relevant alternatives. Methods. Microcatheterization of the heart was performed in 47 anesthetized 3-4 kg New Zealand rabbits to test five techniques of myocardial ischemia: free coils (n = 4), interlocking coils (n = 4), thrombogenic gelatin sponge (n = 4), balloon occlusion (n = 4), and alcohol injection (n = 8). In order to limit ventricular fibrillation, an antiarrhythmic protocol was implemented, with beta-blockers/amiodarone before and xylocaine infusion during the procedure. Clinical, angiographic, and echographic data were gathered. End points included demonstration of vessel occlusion (TIMI flow grades 0 and 1 on the angiogram), impairment of left ventricular function at 2 weeks after procedure (by echocardiography), and pathologically confirmed myocardial infarction. Results. The best arterial access was determined to be through the right carotid artery. The internal mammary guiding catheter 4-Fr was selected as the optimal device for selective intracoronary injection. Free coils deployed prematurely and tended to prolapse into the aorta. Interlocking coils did not deploy completely and failed to provide reliable results. Gelatin sponge was difficult to handle, adhered to the catheter, and could not be clearly visualized by fluoroscopy. Balloon occlusion yielded inconsistent results. Alcohol injection was the most efficient and reproducible method for inducing myocardial infarction (4 out of 6 animals), the extent of which could be fine-tuned by using a coaxial balloon catheter as a microcatheter (0.52 mm) to achieve a superselective injection of 0.2 mL of alcohol. This approach resulted in a 20% decrease in LVEF and infarcted myocardium was confirmed histologically. Conclusions. By following a stepwise approach, a minimally invasive, effective, and reproducible rabbit model of catheter-induced myocardial infarction has been developed which addresses the limitations of rodent experiments while avoiding the logistical and cost issues associated with large animal models. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4609376/ /pubmed/26504843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/893051 Text en Copyright © 2015 Marc-Antoine Isorni et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Isorni, Marc-Antoine
Casanova, Amaury
Piquet, Julie
Bellamy, Valérie
Pignon, Charly
Puymirat, Etienne
Menasche, Philippe
Comparative Analysis of Methods to Induce Myocardial Infarction in a Closed-Chest Rabbit Model
title Comparative Analysis of Methods to Induce Myocardial Infarction in a Closed-Chest Rabbit Model
title_full Comparative Analysis of Methods to Induce Myocardial Infarction in a Closed-Chest Rabbit Model
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Methods to Induce Myocardial Infarction in a Closed-Chest Rabbit Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Methods to Induce Myocardial Infarction in a Closed-Chest Rabbit Model
title_short Comparative Analysis of Methods to Induce Myocardial Infarction in a Closed-Chest Rabbit Model
title_sort comparative analysis of methods to induce myocardial infarction in a closed-chest rabbit model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26504843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/893051
work_keys_str_mv AT isornimarcantoine comparativeanalysisofmethodstoinducemyocardialinfarctioninaclosedchestrabbitmodel
AT casanovaamaury comparativeanalysisofmethodstoinducemyocardialinfarctioninaclosedchestrabbitmodel
AT piquetjulie comparativeanalysisofmethodstoinducemyocardialinfarctioninaclosedchestrabbitmodel
AT bellamyvalerie comparativeanalysisofmethodstoinducemyocardialinfarctioninaclosedchestrabbitmodel
AT pignoncharly comparativeanalysisofmethodstoinducemyocardialinfarctioninaclosedchestrabbitmodel
AT puymiratetienne comparativeanalysisofmethodstoinducemyocardialinfarctioninaclosedchestrabbitmodel
AT menaschephilippe comparativeanalysisofmethodstoinducemyocardialinfarctioninaclosedchestrabbitmodel