Cargando…
Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature
INTRODUCTION: Retreatment of endodontically treated teeth is a challenge that requires complete removal of the previous filling material. Several techniques are indicated for this procedure. The present review tries to identify the most efficient method for extirpation of Resilon (RS) root fillings...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26523136 http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2015.04.002 |
_version_ | 1782395834063650816 |
---|---|
author | Soares, Ciro Maia, Conceição Vale, Fábio Gadê-Neto, Cícero Carvalho, Lilian Oliveira, Hanieri Carvalho, Rejane |
author_facet | Soares, Ciro Maia, Conceição Vale, Fábio Gadê-Neto, Cícero Carvalho, Lilian Oliveira, Hanieri Carvalho, Rejane |
author_sort | Soares, Ciro |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Retreatment of endodontically treated teeth is a challenge that requires complete removal of the previous filling material. Several techniques are indicated for this procedure. The present review tries to identify the most efficient method for extirpation of Resilon (RS) root fillings and to compare the speed and efficacy of RS and gutta-percha (GP) root filling removal. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three trained evaluators conducted a search through three major databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library and Lilacs) over the articles published in the period from 2001 to 2014. The search keywords were Epiphany Sealer, Resilon, Retreatment and Removal Procedure. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included in the final sample (three in vitro studies and nine randomized trials). CONCLUSION: The ProTaper (manual or rotatory) system in combination with chemical solvents is the most efficient method for removing Resilon root filling. Retreatment of Resilon is more rapid and associated with less remnants of debris. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4609657 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Iranian Center for Endodontic Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46096572015-10-30 Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature Soares, Ciro Maia, Conceição Vale, Fábio Gadê-Neto, Cícero Carvalho, Lilian Oliveira, Hanieri Carvalho, Rejane Iran Endod J Review Article INTRODUCTION: Retreatment of endodontically treated teeth is a challenge that requires complete removal of the previous filling material. Several techniques are indicated for this procedure. The present review tries to identify the most efficient method for extirpation of Resilon (RS) root fillings and to compare the speed and efficacy of RS and gutta-percha (GP) root filling removal. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three trained evaluators conducted a search through three major databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library and Lilacs) over the articles published in the period from 2001 to 2014. The search keywords were Epiphany Sealer, Resilon, Retreatment and Removal Procedure. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included in the final sample (three in vitro studies and nine randomized trials). CONCLUSION: The ProTaper (manual or rotatory) system in combination with chemical solvents is the most efficient method for removing Resilon root filling. Retreatment of Resilon is more rapid and associated with less remnants of debris. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4609657/ /pubmed/26523136 http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2015.04.002 Text en © 2015, Iranian Center for Endodontic Research This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Soares, Ciro Maia, Conceição Vale, Fábio Gadê-Neto, Cícero Carvalho, Lilian Oliveira, Hanieri Carvalho, Rejane Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature |
title | Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature |
title_full | Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature |
title_short | Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature |
title_sort | comparison of endodontic retreatment in teeth obturated with resilon or gutta-percha: a review of literature |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26523136 http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2015.04.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soaresciro comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature AT maiaconceicao comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature AT valefabio comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature AT gadenetocicero comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature AT carvalholilian comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature AT oliveirahanieri comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature AT carvalhorejane comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature |