Cargando…

Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature

INTRODUCTION: Retreatment of endodontically treated teeth is a challenge that requires complete removal of the previous filling material. Several techniques are indicated for this procedure. The present review tries to identify the most efficient method for extirpation of Resilon (RS) root fillings...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soares, Ciro, Maia, Conceição, Vale, Fábio, Gadê-Neto, Cícero, Carvalho, Lilian, Oliveira, Hanieri, Carvalho, Rejane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26523136
http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2015.04.002
_version_ 1782395834063650816
author Soares, Ciro
Maia, Conceição
Vale, Fábio
Gadê-Neto, Cícero
Carvalho, Lilian
Oliveira, Hanieri
Carvalho, Rejane
author_facet Soares, Ciro
Maia, Conceição
Vale, Fábio
Gadê-Neto, Cícero
Carvalho, Lilian
Oliveira, Hanieri
Carvalho, Rejane
author_sort Soares, Ciro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Retreatment of endodontically treated teeth is a challenge that requires complete removal of the previous filling material. Several techniques are indicated for this procedure. The present review tries to identify the most efficient method for extirpation of Resilon (RS) root fillings and to compare the speed and efficacy of RS and gutta-percha (GP) root filling removal. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three trained evaluators conducted a search through three major databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library and Lilacs) over the articles published in the period from 2001 to 2014. The search keywords were Epiphany Sealer, Resilon, Retreatment and Removal Procedure. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included in the final sample (three in vitro studies and nine randomized trials). CONCLUSION: The ProTaper (manual or rotatory) system in combination with chemical solvents is the most efficient method for removing Resilon root filling. Retreatment of Resilon is more rapid and associated with less remnants of debris.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4609657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46096572015-10-30 Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature Soares, Ciro Maia, Conceição Vale, Fábio Gadê-Neto, Cícero Carvalho, Lilian Oliveira, Hanieri Carvalho, Rejane Iran Endod J Review Article INTRODUCTION: Retreatment of endodontically treated teeth is a challenge that requires complete removal of the previous filling material. Several techniques are indicated for this procedure. The present review tries to identify the most efficient method for extirpation of Resilon (RS) root fillings and to compare the speed and efficacy of RS and gutta-percha (GP) root filling removal. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three trained evaluators conducted a search through three major databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library and Lilacs) over the articles published in the period from 2001 to 2014. The search keywords were Epiphany Sealer, Resilon, Retreatment and Removal Procedure. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included in the final sample (three in vitro studies and nine randomized trials). CONCLUSION: The ProTaper (manual or rotatory) system in combination with chemical solvents is the most efficient method for removing Resilon root filling. Retreatment of Resilon is more rapid and associated with less remnants of debris. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4609657/ /pubmed/26523136 http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2015.04.002 Text en © 2015, Iranian Center for Endodontic Research This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Soares, Ciro
Maia, Conceição
Vale, Fábio
Gadê-Neto, Cícero
Carvalho, Lilian
Oliveira, Hanieri
Carvalho, Rejane
Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature
title Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature
title_full Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature
title_fullStr Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature
title_short Comparison of Endodontic Retreatment in Teeth Obturated With Resilon or Gutta-Percha: A Review of Literature
title_sort comparison of endodontic retreatment in teeth obturated with resilon or gutta-percha: a review of literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26523136
http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2015.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT soaresciro comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature
AT maiaconceicao comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature
AT valefabio comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature
AT gadenetocicero comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature
AT carvalholilian comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature
AT oliveirahanieri comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature
AT carvalhorejane comparisonofendodonticretreatmentinteethobturatedwithresilonorguttaperchaareviewofliterature