Cargando…
Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgical procedures, many clinicians recommend supraglottic airway devices as good alternatives to intubation. We compared the i-gel® (i-gel) and LMA Supreme® (Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway, SLMA) airway devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding sealing pressu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.455 |
_version_ | 1782396012275433472 |
---|---|
author | Park, Sang Yoong Rim, Jong Cheol Kim, Hyuk Lee, Ji Hyeon Chung, Chan Jong |
author_facet | Park, Sang Yoong Rim, Jong Cheol Kim, Hyuk Lee, Ji Hyeon Chung, Chan Jong |
author_sort | Park, Sang Yoong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgical procedures, many clinicians recommend supraglottic airway devices as good alternatives to intubation. We compared the i-gel® (i-gel) and LMA Supreme® (Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway, SLMA) airway devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding sealing pressure and respiratory parameters before, during, and after pneumoperitoneum. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, 93 patients were randomly allocated into the i-gel (n = 47) or SLMA group (n = 46). Insertion time, number of insertion attempts, and fiberoptic view of glottis were recorded. Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), the use of airway manipulation, peak inspiratory pressure, lung compliance, and hemodynamic parameters were measured before, during, and after pneumoperitoneum. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding demographic data, insertion time, fiberoptic view of glottis, and the use of airway manipulation. The gastric tube insertion time was longer in the i-gel group (20.4 ± 3.9 s) than in the SLMA group (16.7 ± 1.6 s) (P < 0.001). All devices were inserted on the first attempt, excluding one case in each group. Peak inspiratory pressure, lung compliance, and OLP changed following carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in each group, but there were no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both the i-gel and SLMA airway devices can be comparably used in patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and they offer similar performance including OLP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4610924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46109242015-10-22 Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Park, Sang Yoong Rim, Jong Cheol Kim, Hyuk Lee, Ji Hyeon Chung, Chan Jong Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgical procedures, many clinicians recommend supraglottic airway devices as good alternatives to intubation. We compared the i-gel® (i-gel) and LMA Supreme® (Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway, SLMA) airway devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding sealing pressure and respiratory parameters before, during, and after pneumoperitoneum. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, 93 patients were randomly allocated into the i-gel (n = 47) or SLMA group (n = 46). Insertion time, number of insertion attempts, and fiberoptic view of glottis were recorded. Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), the use of airway manipulation, peak inspiratory pressure, lung compliance, and hemodynamic parameters were measured before, during, and after pneumoperitoneum. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding demographic data, insertion time, fiberoptic view of glottis, and the use of airway manipulation. The gastric tube insertion time was longer in the i-gel group (20.4 ± 3.9 s) than in the SLMA group (16.7 ± 1.6 s) (P < 0.001). All devices were inserted on the first attempt, excluding one case in each group. Peak inspiratory pressure, lung compliance, and OLP changed following carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in each group, but there were no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both the i-gel and SLMA airway devices can be comparably used in patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and they offer similar performance including OLP. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2015-10 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4610924/ /pubmed/26495055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.455 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Article Park, Sang Yoong Rim, Jong Cheol Kim, Hyuk Lee, Ji Hyeon Chung, Chan Jong Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title | Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title_full | Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title_short | Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
title_sort | comparison of i-gel® and lma supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
topic | Clinical Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.455 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parksangyoong comparisonofigelandlmasupremeduringlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT rimjongcheol comparisonofigelandlmasupremeduringlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT kimhyuk comparisonofigelandlmasupremeduringlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT leejihyeon comparisonofigelandlmasupremeduringlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT chungchanjong comparisonofigelandlmasupremeduringlaparoscopiccholecystectomy |