Cargando…

Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgical procedures, many clinicians recommend supraglottic airway devices as good alternatives to intubation. We compared the i-gel® (i-gel) and LMA Supreme® (Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway, SLMA) airway devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding sealing pressu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sang Yoong, Rim, Jong Cheol, Kim, Hyuk, Lee, Ji Hyeon, Chung, Chan Jong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495055
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.455
_version_ 1782396012275433472
author Park, Sang Yoong
Rim, Jong Cheol
Kim, Hyuk
Lee, Ji Hyeon
Chung, Chan Jong
author_facet Park, Sang Yoong
Rim, Jong Cheol
Kim, Hyuk
Lee, Ji Hyeon
Chung, Chan Jong
author_sort Park, Sang Yoong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgical procedures, many clinicians recommend supraglottic airway devices as good alternatives to intubation. We compared the i-gel® (i-gel) and LMA Supreme® (Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway, SLMA) airway devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding sealing pressure and respiratory parameters before, during, and after pneumoperitoneum. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, 93 patients were randomly allocated into the i-gel (n = 47) or SLMA group (n = 46). Insertion time, number of insertion attempts, and fiberoptic view of glottis were recorded. Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), the use of airway manipulation, peak inspiratory pressure, lung compliance, and hemodynamic parameters were measured before, during, and after pneumoperitoneum. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding demographic data, insertion time, fiberoptic view of glottis, and the use of airway manipulation. The gastric tube insertion time was longer in the i-gel group (20.4 ± 3.9 s) than in the SLMA group (16.7 ± 1.6 s) (P < 0.001). All devices were inserted on the first attempt, excluding one case in each group. Peak inspiratory pressure, lung compliance, and OLP changed following carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in each group, but there were no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both the i-gel and SLMA airway devices can be comparably used in patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and they offer similar performance including OLP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4610924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46109242015-10-22 Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Park, Sang Yoong Rim, Jong Cheol Kim, Hyuk Lee, Ji Hyeon Chung, Chan Jong Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgical procedures, many clinicians recommend supraglottic airway devices as good alternatives to intubation. We compared the i-gel® (i-gel) and LMA Supreme® (Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway, SLMA) airway devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding sealing pressure and respiratory parameters before, during, and after pneumoperitoneum. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, 93 patients were randomly allocated into the i-gel (n = 47) or SLMA group (n = 46). Insertion time, number of insertion attempts, and fiberoptic view of glottis were recorded. Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), the use of airway manipulation, peak inspiratory pressure, lung compliance, and hemodynamic parameters were measured before, during, and after pneumoperitoneum. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding demographic data, insertion time, fiberoptic view of glottis, and the use of airway manipulation. The gastric tube insertion time was longer in the i-gel group (20.4 ± 3.9 s) than in the SLMA group (16.7 ± 1.6 s) (P < 0.001). All devices were inserted on the first attempt, excluding one case in each group. Peak inspiratory pressure, lung compliance, and OLP changed following carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in each group, but there were no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both the i-gel and SLMA airway devices can be comparably used in patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and they offer similar performance including OLP. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2015-10 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4610924/ /pubmed/26495055 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.455 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Park, Sang Yoong
Rim, Jong Cheol
Kim, Hyuk
Lee, Ji Hyeon
Chung, Chan Jong
Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_short Comparison of i-gel® and LMA Supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
title_sort comparison of i-gel® and lma supreme® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495055
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.455
work_keys_str_mv AT parksangyoong comparisonofigelandlmasupremeduringlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT rimjongcheol comparisonofigelandlmasupremeduringlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT kimhyuk comparisonofigelandlmasupremeduringlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT leejihyeon comparisonofigelandlmasupremeduringlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT chungchanjong comparisonofigelandlmasupremeduringlaparoscopiccholecystectomy