Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery
BACKGROUND: The Mega Acer Kit® (MAK) is a newly designed heated and humidified breathing circuit that warms fluid passing through the circuit lumen. In this study, we investigated the system's efficacy for the perioperative prevention of hypothermia and fluid warming. METHODS: Ninety patients u...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495056 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.462 |
_version_ | 1782396012518703104 |
---|---|
author | Jung, Ki Tae Kim, Sang Hun So, Keum Young So, Hyeong Jin Shim, Soo Bin |
author_facet | Jung, Ki Tae Kim, Sang Hun So, Keum Young So, Hyeong Jin Shim, Soo Bin |
author_sort | Jung, Ki Tae |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Mega Acer Kit® (MAK) is a newly designed heated and humidified breathing circuit that warms fluid passing through the circuit lumen. In this study, we investigated the system's efficacy for the perioperative prevention of hypothermia and fluid warming. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing spinal surgery were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to 3 groups based on the fluid warming device used: no fluid warming system (Group C, n = 30), via a Standard Ranger (Group R, n = 30), or via the MAK (Group M, n = 30). Distal esophageal temperatures (Teso) and infusion fluid temperature (TF) were recorded at 15 min intervals for duration of 180 min during surgery. If Teso was < 35.0℃, a forced-air convective warming device was used. RESULTS: Final Teso values were 34.8 ± 0.3℃, 35.1 ± 0.1℃, and 35.8 ± 0.3℃ in groups C, R, and M, respectively (P < 0.01). Teso was significantly higher in group M when compared with that in groups C and R throughout the study period (P < 0.05). The number of patients requiring a forced-air convective warming device was significantly lower in group M (n = 0) when compared with that in groups R (n = 17) and C (n = 30) (P < 0.05). The final infusion fluid temperature was higher in group M when compared with that in groups C and R throughout the study period (35.4 ± 1.0 vs. 23.0 ± 0.3 and 32.8 ± 0.6℃; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The MAK is more effective for preventing hypothermia and for warming fluid than the Standard Ranger. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4610925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46109252015-10-22 Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery Jung, Ki Tae Kim, Sang Hun So, Keum Young So, Hyeong Jin Shim, Soo Bin Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: The Mega Acer Kit® (MAK) is a newly designed heated and humidified breathing circuit that warms fluid passing through the circuit lumen. In this study, we investigated the system's efficacy for the perioperative prevention of hypothermia and fluid warming. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing spinal surgery were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to 3 groups based on the fluid warming device used: no fluid warming system (Group C, n = 30), via a Standard Ranger (Group R, n = 30), or via the MAK (Group M, n = 30). Distal esophageal temperatures (Teso) and infusion fluid temperature (TF) were recorded at 15 min intervals for duration of 180 min during surgery. If Teso was < 35.0℃, a forced-air convective warming device was used. RESULTS: Final Teso values were 34.8 ± 0.3℃, 35.1 ± 0.1℃, and 35.8 ± 0.3℃ in groups C, R, and M, respectively (P < 0.01). Teso was significantly higher in group M when compared with that in groups C and R throughout the study period (P < 0.05). The number of patients requiring a forced-air convective warming device was significantly lower in group M (n = 0) when compared with that in groups R (n = 17) and C (n = 30) (P < 0.05). The final infusion fluid temperature was higher in group M when compared with that in groups C and R throughout the study period (35.4 ± 1.0 vs. 23.0 ± 0.3 and 32.8 ± 0.6℃; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The MAK is more effective for preventing hypothermia and for warming fluid than the Standard Ranger. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2015-10 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4610925/ /pubmed/26495056 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.462 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Article Jung, Ki Tae Kim, Sang Hun So, Keum Young So, Hyeong Jin Shim, Soo Bin Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery |
title | Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery |
topic | Clinical Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495056 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.462 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jungkitae clinicalevaluationofanewlydesignedfluidwarmingkitonfluidwarmingandhypothermiaduringspinalsurgery AT kimsanghun clinicalevaluationofanewlydesignedfluidwarmingkitonfluidwarmingandhypothermiaduringspinalsurgery AT sokeumyoung clinicalevaluationofanewlydesignedfluidwarmingkitonfluidwarmingandhypothermiaduringspinalsurgery AT sohyeongjin clinicalevaluationofanewlydesignedfluidwarmingkitonfluidwarmingandhypothermiaduringspinalsurgery AT shimsoobin clinicalevaluationofanewlydesignedfluidwarmingkitonfluidwarmingandhypothermiaduringspinalsurgery |