Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery

BACKGROUND: The Mega Acer Kit® (MAK) is a newly designed heated and humidified breathing circuit that warms fluid passing through the circuit lumen. In this study, we investigated the system's efficacy for the perioperative prevention of hypothermia and fluid warming. METHODS: Ninety patients u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Ki Tae, Kim, Sang Hun, So, Keum Young, So, Hyeong Jin, Shim, Soo Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495056
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.462
_version_ 1782396012518703104
author Jung, Ki Tae
Kim, Sang Hun
So, Keum Young
So, Hyeong Jin
Shim, Soo Bin
author_facet Jung, Ki Tae
Kim, Sang Hun
So, Keum Young
So, Hyeong Jin
Shim, Soo Bin
author_sort Jung, Ki Tae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Mega Acer Kit® (MAK) is a newly designed heated and humidified breathing circuit that warms fluid passing through the circuit lumen. In this study, we investigated the system's efficacy for the perioperative prevention of hypothermia and fluid warming. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing spinal surgery were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to 3 groups based on the fluid warming device used: no fluid warming system (Group C, n = 30), via a Standard Ranger (Group R, n = 30), or via the MAK (Group M, n = 30). Distal esophageal temperatures (Teso) and infusion fluid temperature (TF) were recorded at 15 min intervals for duration of 180 min during surgery. If Teso was < 35.0℃, a forced-air convective warming device was used. RESULTS: Final Teso values were 34.8 ± 0.3℃, 35.1 ± 0.1℃, and 35.8 ± 0.3℃ in groups C, R, and M, respectively (P < 0.01). Teso was significantly higher in group M when compared with that in groups C and R throughout the study period (P < 0.05). The number of patients requiring a forced-air convective warming device was significantly lower in group M (n = 0) when compared with that in groups R (n = 17) and C (n = 30) (P < 0.05). The final infusion fluid temperature was higher in group M when compared with that in groups C and R throughout the study period (35.4 ± 1.0 vs. 23.0 ± 0.3 and 32.8 ± 0.6℃; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The MAK is more effective for preventing hypothermia and for warming fluid than the Standard Ranger.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4610925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46109252015-10-22 Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery Jung, Ki Tae Kim, Sang Hun So, Keum Young So, Hyeong Jin Shim, Soo Bin Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: The Mega Acer Kit® (MAK) is a newly designed heated and humidified breathing circuit that warms fluid passing through the circuit lumen. In this study, we investigated the system's efficacy for the perioperative prevention of hypothermia and fluid warming. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing spinal surgery were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to 3 groups based on the fluid warming device used: no fluid warming system (Group C, n = 30), via a Standard Ranger (Group R, n = 30), or via the MAK (Group M, n = 30). Distal esophageal temperatures (Teso) and infusion fluid temperature (TF) were recorded at 15 min intervals for duration of 180 min during surgery. If Teso was < 35.0℃, a forced-air convective warming device was used. RESULTS: Final Teso values were 34.8 ± 0.3℃, 35.1 ± 0.1℃, and 35.8 ± 0.3℃ in groups C, R, and M, respectively (P < 0.01). Teso was significantly higher in group M when compared with that in groups C and R throughout the study period (P < 0.05). The number of patients requiring a forced-air convective warming device was significantly lower in group M (n = 0) when compared with that in groups R (n = 17) and C (n = 30) (P < 0.05). The final infusion fluid temperature was higher in group M when compared with that in groups C and R throughout the study period (35.4 ± 1.0 vs. 23.0 ± 0.3 and 32.8 ± 0.6℃; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The MAK is more effective for preventing hypothermia and for warming fluid than the Standard Ranger. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2015-10 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4610925/ /pubmed/26495056 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.462 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Jung, Ki Tae
Kim, Sang Hun
So, Keum Young
So, Hyeong Jin
Shim, Soo Bin
Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery
title Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery
title_full Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery
title_short Clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery
title_sort clinical evaluation of a newly designed fluid warming kit on fluid warming and hypothermia during spinal surgery
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495056
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.462
work_keys_str_mv AT jungkitae clinicalevaluationofanewlydesignedfluidwarmingkitonfluidwarmingandhypothermiaduringspinalsurgery
AT kimsanghun clinicalevaluationofanewlydesignedfluidwarmingkitonfluidwarmingandhypothermiaduringspinalsurgery
AT sokeumyoung clinicalevaluationofanewlydesignedfluidwarmingkitonfluidwarmingandhypothermiaduringspinalsurgery
AT sohyeongjin clinicalevaluationofanewlydesignedfluidwarmingkitonfluidwarmingandhypothermiaduringspinalsurgery
AT shimsoobin clinicalevaluationofanewlydesignedfluidwarmingkitonfluidwarmingandhypothermiaduringspinalsurgery