Cargando…
Confirmatory Trials in the Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Man—PFS2: A Measure of Therapeutic Action-At-A-Distance
Overall survival (OS) has emerged as the definitive regulatory “be-all, end-all” for the demonstration of benefit in cancer clinical trials. The reason and the rationale for why this is so are easily appreciated: literally a “test of time,” OS is a seemingly unambiguous, agenda-free end point, indep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Neoplasia Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4611069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26476079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2015.09.001 |
_version_ | 1782396045248954368 |
---|---|
author | Oronsky, Bryan Carter, Corey A. Reid, Tony R. Scicinski, Jan Oronsky, Arnold Lybeck, Michelle Caroen, Scott Stirn, Meaghan Oronsky, Neil Langecker, Peter |
author_facet | Oronsky, Bryan Carter, Corey A. Reid, Tony R. Scicinski, Jan Oronsky, Arnold Lybeck, Michelle Caroen, Scott Stirn, Meaghan Oronsky, Neil Langecker, Peter |
author_sort | Oronsky, Bryan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Overall survival (OS) has emerged as the definitive regulatory “be-all, end-all” for the demonstration of benefit in cancer clinical trials. The reason and the rationale for why this is so are easily appreciated: literally a “test of time,” OS is a seemingly unambiguous, agenda-free end point, independent of bias-prone variables such as the frequency and methods of assessment, clinical evaluation, and the definition of progression. However, by general consensus, OS is an imperfect end point for several reasons: First, it may often be impractical because of the length, cost, and the size of clinical trials. Second, OS captures the impact of subsequent therapies, both beneficial (i.e., active) and detrimental, on survival but it does not take into account the contribution of subsequent therapies by treatment arm; the postprogression period is treated as an unknown black box (no information about the potential influence of next-line therapies on the outcome) under the implicit assumption that the clinical trial treatment is the only clinical variable that matters: what OS explicitly measures is the destination, that is, the elapsed time between the date of randomization (or intention to treat) and the date of death, not the journey, that is, what transpires in-between. In long-term maintenance strategies, patients receive treatment in temporally separated but mutually interdependent and causally linked sequences that exert a “field of influence” akin to action-at-a-distance forces like gravity, electricity, and magnetism on both the tumor and each other. Hence, in this setting, a new end point, PFS2, is required to measure this field of influence. This article reviews the definition and use in clinical trials of PFS2 and makes the case for its potential applicability as a preferred end point to measure the mutual influence of individual regimens in long-term maintenance strategies with resensitizing agents in particular. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4611069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Neoplasia Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46110692015-11-10 Confirmatory Trials in the Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Man—PFS2: A Measure of Therapeutic Action-At-A-Distance Oronsky, Bryan Carter, Corey A. Reid, Tony R. Scicinski, Jan Oronsky, Arnold Lybeck, Michelle Caroen, Scott Stirn, Meaghan Oronsky, Neil Langecker, Peter Neoplasia Article Overall survival (OS) has emerged as the definitive regulatory “be-all, end-all” for the demonstration of benefit in cancer clinical trials. The reason and the rationale for why this is so are easily appreciated: literally a “test of time,” OS is a seemingly unambiguous, agenda-free end point, independent of bias-prone variables such as the frequency and methods of assessment, clinical evaluation, and the definition of progression. However, by general consensus, OS is an imperfect end point for several reasons: First, it may often be impractical because of the length, cost, and the size of clinical trials. Second, OS captures the impact of subsequent therapies, both beneficial (i.e., active) and detrimental, on survival but it does not take into account the contribution of subsequent therapies by treatment arm; the postprogression period is treated as an unknown black box (no information about the potential influence of next-line therapies on the outcome) under the implicit assumption that the clinical trial treatment is the only clinical variable that matters: what OS explicitly measures is the destination, that is, the elapsed time between the date of randomization (or intention to treat) and the date of death, not the journey, that is, what transpires in-between. In long-term maintenance strategies, patients receive treatment in temporally separated but mutually interdependent and causally linked sequences that exert a “field of influence” akin to action-at-a-distance forces like gravity, electricity, and magnetism on both the tumor and each other. Hence, in this setting, a new end point, PFS2, is required to measure this field of influence. This article reviews the definition and use in clinical trials of PFS2 and makes the case for its potential applicability as a preferred end point to measure the mutual influence of individual regimens in long-term maintenance strategies with resensitizing agents in particular. Neoplasia Press 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4611069/ /pubmed/26476079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2015.09.001 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Oronsky, Bryan Carter, Corey A. Reid, Tony R. Scicinski, Jan Oronsky, Arnold Lybeck, Michelle Caroen, Scott Stirn, Meaghan Oronsky, Neil Langecker, Peter Confirmatory Trials in the Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Man—PFS2: A Measure of Therapeutic Action-At-A-Distance |
title | Confirmatory Trials in the Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Man—PFS2: A Measure of Therapeutic Action-At-A-Distance |
title_full | Confirmatory Trials in the Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Man—PFS2: A Measure of Therapeutic Action-At-A-Distance |
title_fullStr | Confirmatory Trials in the Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Man—PFS2: A Measure of Therapeutic Action-At-A-Distance |
title_full_unstemmed | Confirmatory Trials in the Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Man—PFS2: A Measure of Therapeutic Action-At-A-Distance |
title_short | Confirmatory Trials in the Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Man—PFS2: A Measure of Therapeutic Action-At-A-Distance |
title_sort | confirmatory trials in the evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man—pfs2: a measure of therapeutic action-at-a-distance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4611069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26476079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2015.09.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oronskybryan confirmatorytrialsintheevaluationofanticancermedicinalproductsinmanpfs2ameasureoftherapeuticactionatadistance AT cartercoreya confirmatorytrialsintheevaluationofanticancermedicinalproductsinmanpfs2ameasureoftherapeuticactionatadistance AT reidtonyr confirmatorytrialsintheevaluationofanticancermedicinalproductsinmanpfs2ameasureoftherapeuticactionatadistance AT scicinskijan confirmatorytrialsintheevaluationofanticancermedicinalproductsinmanpfs2ameasureoftherapeuticactionatadistance AT oronskyarnold confirmatorytrialsintheevaluationofanticancermedicinalproductsinmanpfs2ameasureoftherapeuticactionatadistance AT lybeckmichelle confirmatorytrialsintheevaluationofanticancermedicinalproductsinmanpfs2ameasureoftherapeuticactionatadistance AT caroenscott confirmatorytrialsintheevaluationofanticancermedicinalproductsinmanpfs2ameasureoftherapeuticactionatadistance AT stirnmeaghan confirmatorytrialsintheevaluationofanticancermedicinalproductsinmanpfs2ameasureoftherapeuticactionatadistance AT oronskyneil confirmatorytrialsintheevaluationofanticancermedicinalproductsinmanpfs2ameasureoftherapeuticactionatadistance AT langeckerpeter confirmatorytrialsintheevaluationofanticancermedicinalproductsinmanpfs2ameasureoftherapeuticactionatadistance |