Cargando…

Good is up—spatial metaphors in action observation

Positive objects or actions are associated with physical highness, whereas negative objects or actions are related to physical lowness. Previous research suggests that metaphorical connection (“good is up” or “bad is down”) between spatial experience and evaluation of objects is grounded in actual e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gottwald, Janna M., Elsner, Birgit, Pollatos, Olga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4611084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26539147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01605
_version_ 1782396048612786176
author Gottwald, Janna M.
Elsner, Birgit
Pollatos, Olga
author_facet Gottwald, Janna M.
Elsner, Birgit
Pollatos, Olga
author_sort Gottwald, Janna M.
collection PubMed
description Positive objects or actions are associated with physical highness, whereas negative objects or actions are related to physical lowness. Previous research suggests that metaphorical connection (“good is up” or “bad is down”) between spatial experience and evaluation of objects is grounded in actual experience with the body. Prior studies investigated effects of spatial metaphors with respect to verticality of either static objects or self-performed actions. By presenting videos of object placements, the current three experiments combined vertically-located stimuli with observation of vertically-directed actions. As expected, participants’ ratings of emotionally-neutral objects were systematically influenced by the observed vertical positioning, that is, ratings were more positive for objects that were observed being placed up as compared to down. Moreover, effects were slightly more pronounced for “bad is down,” because only the observed downward, but not the upward, action led to different ratings as compared to a medium-positioned action. Last, some ratings were even affected by observing only the upward/downward action, without seeing the final vertical placement of the object. Thus, both, a combination of observing a vertically-directed action and seeing a vertically-located object, and observing a vertically-directed action alone, affected participants’ evaluation of emotional valence of the involved object. The present findings expand the relevance of spatial metaphors to action observation, thereby giving new impetus to embodied-cognition research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4611084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46110842015-11-04 Good is up—spatial metaphors in action observation Gottwald, Janna M. Elsner, Birgit Pollatos, Olga Front Psychol Psychology Positive objects or actions are associated with physical highness, whereas negative objects or actions are related to physical lowness. Previous research suggests that metaphorical connection (“good is up” or “bad is down”) between spatial experience and evaluation of objects is grounded in actual experience with the body. Prior studies investigated effects of spatial metaphors with respect to verticality of either static objects or self-performed actions. By presenting videos of object placements, the current three experiments combined vertically-located stimuli with observation of vertically-directed actions. As expected, participants’ ratings of emotionally-neutral objects were systematically influenced by the observed vertical positioning, that is, ratings were more positive for objects that were observed being placed up as compared to down. Moreover, effects were slightly more pronounced for “bad is down,” because only the observed downward, but not the upward, action led to different ratings as compared to a medium-positioned action. Last, some ratings were even affected by observing only the upward/downward action, without seeing the final vertical placement of the object. Thus, both, a combination of observing a vertically-directed action and seeing a vertically-located object, and observing a vertically-directed action alone, affected participants’ evaluation of emotional valence of the involved object. The present findings expand the relevance of spatial metaphors to action observation, thereby giving new impetus to embodied-cognition research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4611084/ /pubmed/26539147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01605 Text en Copyright © 2015 Gottwald, Elsner and Pollatos. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Gottwald, Janna M.
Elsner, Birgit
Pollatos, Olga
Good is up—spatial metaphors in action observation
title Good is up—spatial metaphors in action observation
title_full Good is up—spatial metaphors in action observation
title_fullStr Good is up—spatial metaphors in action observation
title_full_unstemmed Good is up—spatial metaphors in action observation
title_short Good is up—spatial metaphors in action observation
title_sort good is up—spatial metaphors in action observation
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4611084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26539147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01605
work_keys_str_mv AT gottwaldjannam goodisupspatialmetaphorsinactionobservation
AT elsnerbirgit goodisupspatialmetaphorsinactionobservation
AT pollatosolga goodisupspatialmetaphorsinactionobservation