Cargando…

Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of in situ simulation (ISS) versus off-site simulation (OSS) on knowledge, patient safety attitude, stress, motivation, perceptions of simulation, team performance and organisational impact. DESIGN: Investigator-initiated single-centre randomised superiority educ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sørensen, Jette Led, van der Vleuten, Cees, Rosthøj, Susanne, Østergaard, Doris, LeBlanc, Vicki, Johansen, Marianne, Ekelund, Kim, Starkopf, Liis, Lindschou, Jane, Gluud, Christian, Weikop, Pia, Ottesen, Bent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4611309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008344
_version_ 1782396074324918272
author Sørensen, Jette Led
van der Vleuten, Cees
Rosthøj, Susanne
Østergaard, Doris
LeBlanc, Vicki
Johansen, Marianne
Ekelund, Kim
Starkopf, Liis
Lindschou, Jane
Gluud, Christian
Weikop, Pia
Ottesen, Bent
author_facet Sørensen, Jette Led
van der Vleuten, Cees
Rosthøj, Susanne
Østergaard, Doris
LeBlanc, Vicki
Johansen, Marianne
Ekelund, Kim
Starkopf, Liis
Lindschou, Jane
Gluud, Christian
Weikop, Pia
Ottesen, Bent
author_sort Sørensen, Jette Led
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of in situ simulation (ISS) versus off-site simulation (OSS) on knowledge, patient safety attitude, stress, motivation, perceptions of simulation, team performance and organisational impact. DESIGN: Investigator-initiated single-centre randomised superiority educational trial. SETTING: Obstetrics and anaesthesiology departments, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 100 participants in teams of 10, comprising midwives, specialised midwives, auxiliary nurses, nurse anaesthetists, operating theatre nurses, and consultant doctors and trainees in obstetrics and anaesthesiology. INTERVENTIONS: Two multiprofessional simulations (clinical management of an emergency caesarean section and a postpartum haemorrhage scenario) were conducted in teams of 10 in the ISS versus the OSS setting. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Knowledge assessed by a multiple choice question test. EXPLORATORY OUTCOMES: Individual outcomes: scores on the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, stress measurements (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, cognitive appraisal and salivary cortisol), Intrinsic Motivation Inventory and perceptions of simulations. Team outcome: video assessment of team performance. Organisational impact: suggestions for organisational changes. RESULTS: The trial was conducted from April to June 2013. No differences between the two groups were found for the multiple choice question test, patient safety attitude, stress measurements, motivation or the evaluation of the simulations. The participants in the ISS group scored the authenticity of the simulation significantly higher than did the participants in the OSS group. Expert video assessment of team performance showed no differences between the ISS versus the OSS group. The ISS group provided more ideas and suggestions for changes at the organisational level. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomised trial, no significant differences were found regarding knowledge, patient safety attitude, motivation or stress measurements when comparing ISS versus OSS. Although participant perception of the authenticity of ISS versus OSS differed significantly, there were no differences in other outcomes between the groups except that the ISS group generated more suggestions for organisational changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01792674.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4611309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46113092015-10-23 Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial Sørensen, Jette Led van der Vleuten, Cees Rosthøj, Susanne Østergaard, Doris LeBlanc, Vicki Johansen, Marianne Ekelund, Kim Starkopf, Liis Lindschou, Jane Gluud, Christian Weikop, Pia Ottesen, Bent BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of in situ simulation (ISS) versus off-site simulation (OSS) on knowledge, patient safety attitude, stress, motivation, perceptions of simulation, team performance and organisational impact. DESIGN: Investigator-initiated single-centre randomised superiority educational trial. SETTING: Obstetrics and anaesthesiology departments, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 100 participants in teams of 10, comprising midwives, specialised midwives, auxiliary nurses, nurse anaesthetists, operating theatre nurses, and consultant doctors and trainees in obstetrics and anaesthesiology. INTERVENTIONS: Two multiprofessional simulations (clinical management of an emergency caesarean section and a postpartum haemorrhage scenario) were conducted in teams of 10 in the ISS versus the OSS setting. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Knowledge assessed by a multiple choice question test. EXPLORATORY OUTCOMES: Individual outcomes: scores on the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, stress measurements (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, cognitive appraisal and salivary cortisol), Intrinsic Motivation Inventory and perceptions of simulations. Team outcome: video assessment of team performance. Organisational impact: suggestions for organisational changes. RESULTS: The trial was conducted from April to June 2013. No differences between the two groups were found for the multiple choice question test, patient safety attitude, stress measurements, motivation or the evaluation of the simulations. The participants in the ISS group scored the authenticity of the simulation significantly higher than did the participants in the OSS group. Expert video assessment of team performance showed no differences between the ISS versus the OSS group. The ISS group provided more ideas and suggestions for changes at the organisational level. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomised trial, no significant differences were found regarding knowledge, patient safety attitude, motivation or stress measurements when comparing ISS versus OSS. Although participant perception of the authenticity of ISS versus OSS differed significantly, there were no differences in other outcomes between the groups except that the ISS group generated more suggestions for organisational changes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01792674. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4611309/ /pubmed/26443654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008344 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Sørensen, Jette Led
van der Vleuten, Cees
Rosthøj, Susanne
Østergaard, Doris
LeBlanc, Vicki
Johansen, Marianne
Ekelund, Kim
Starkopf, Liis
Lindschou, Jane
Gluud, Christian
Weikop, Pia
Ottesen, Bent
Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial
title Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial
title_full Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial
title_fullStr Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial
title_full_unstemmed Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial
title_short Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial
title_sort simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4611309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26443654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008344
work_keys_str_mv AT sørensenjetteled simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT vandervleutencees simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT rosthøjsusanne simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT østergaarddoris simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT leblancvicki simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT johansenmarianne simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT ekelundkim simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT starkopfliis simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT lindschoujane simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT gluudchristian simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT weikoppia simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial
AT ottesenbent simulationbasedmultiprofessionalobstetricanaesthesiatrainingconductedinsituversusoffsiteleadstosimilarindividualandteamoutcomesarandomisededucationaltrial