Cargando…

PHOTOPROBER® Biotin: An Alternative Method for Labeling Archival DNA for Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) represents a powerful method for screening the entire genome of solid tumors for chromosomal imbalances. Particularly it enabled the molecular cytogenetic analysis of archival, formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue. A well‐known dilemma, however, is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korinth, Dirk, Donhuijsen, Konrad, Bockmühl, Ulrike, Petersen, Iver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4612255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15623943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/847515
_version_ 1782396148180320256
author Korinth, Dirk
Donhuijsen, Konrad
Bockmühl, Ulrike
Petersen, Iver
author_facet Korinth, Dirk
Donhuijsen, Konrad
Bockmühl, Ulrike
Petersen, Iver
author_sort Korinth, Dirk
collection PubMed
description Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) represents a powerful method for screening the entire genome of solid tumors for chromosomal imbalances. Particularly it enabled the molecular cytogenetic analysis of archival, formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue. A well‐known dilemma, however, is the poor DNA quality of this material with fragment sizes below 1000 bp. Nick translation, the conventionally used enzymatic DNA labeling method in CGH, leads to even shorter fragments often below a critical limit for successful analysis. In this study we report the alternative application of non‐enzymatic, PHOTOPROBE® biotin labeling for conjugation of the hapten to the DNA prior to in situ hybridization and fluorescence detection. We analyzed 51 FFPE tumor samples mainly from the upper respiratory tract by both labeling methods. In 19 cases, both approaches were successful. The comparison of hybridized metaphases showed a distinct higher fluorescence signal of the PHOTOPROBE® samples sometimes with a discrete cytoplasm background which however did not interfere with specificity and sensitivity of the detected chromosomal imbalances. For further 32 cases characterized by an average DNA fragment size below 1000 bp, PHOTOPROBE® biotin was the only successful labeling technique thus offering a new option for CGH analysis of highly degraded DNA from archival material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4612255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46122552016-01-12 PHOTOPROBER® Biotin: An Alternative Method for Labeling Archival DNA for Comparative Genomic Hybridization Korinth, Dirk Donhuijsen, Konrad Bockmühl, Ulrike Petersen, Iver Cell Oncol Other Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) represents a powerful method for screening the entire genome of solid tumors for chromosomal imbalances. Particularly it enabled the molecular cytogenetic analysis of archival, formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissue. A well‐known dilemma, however, is the poor DNA quality of this material with fragment sizes below 1000 bp. Nick translation, the conventionally used enzymatic DNA labeling method in CGH, leads to even shorter fragments often below a critical limit for successful analysis. In this study we report the alternative application of non‐enzymatic, PHOTOPROBE® biotin labeling for conjugation of the hapten to the DNA prior to in situ hybridization and fluorescence detection. We analyzed 51 FFPE tumor samples mainly from the upper respiratory tract by both labeling methods. In 19 cases, both approaches were successful. The comparison of hybridized metaphases showed a distinct higher fluorescence signal of the PHOTOPROBE® samples sometimes with a discrete cytoplasm background which however did not interfere with specificity and sensitivity of the detected chromosomal imbalances. For further 32 cases characterized by an average DNA fragment size below 1000 bp, PHOTOPROBE® biotin was the only successful labeling technique thus offering a new option for CGH analysis of highly degraded DNA from archival material. IOS Press 2004 2004-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4612255/ /pubmed/15623943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/847515 Text en Copyright © 2004 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors.
spellingShingle Other
Korinth, Dirk
Donhuijsen, Konrad
Bockmühl, Ulrike
Petersen, Iver
PHOTOPROBER® Biotin: An Alternative Method for Labeling Archival DNA for Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title PHOTOPROBER® Biotin: An Alternative Method for Labeling Archival DNA for Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title_full PHOTOPROBER® Biotin: An Alternative Method for Labeling Archival DNA for Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title_fullStr PHOTOPROBER® Biotin: An Alternative Method for Labeling Archival DNA for Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title_full_unstemmed PHOTOPROBER® Biotin: An Alternative Method for Labeling Archival DNA for Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title_short PHOTOPROBER® Biotin: An Alternative Method for Labeling Archival DNA for Comparative Genomic Hybridization
title_sort photoprober® biotin: an alternative method for labeling archival dna for comparative genomic hybridization
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4612255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15623943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/847515
work_keys_str_mv AT korinthdirk photoproberbiotinanalternativemethodforlabelingarchivaldnaforcomparativegenomichybridization
AT donhuijsenkonrad photoproberbiotinanalternativemethodforlabelingarchivaldnaforcomparativegenomichybridization
AT bockmuhlulrike photoproberbiotinanalternativemethodforlabelingarchivaldnaforcomparativegenomichybridization
AT peterseniver photoproberbiotinanalternativemethodforlabelingarchivaldnaforcomparativegenomichybridization