Cargando…

Confocal 3D DNA Cytometry: Assessment of Required Coefficient of Variation by Computer Simulation

Background: Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) provides the opportunity to perform 3D DNA content measurements on intact cells in thick histological sections. So far, sample size has been limited by the time consuming nature of the technology. Since the power of DNA histograms to resolve diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ploeger, Lennert S., Beliën, Jeroen A.M., Poulin, Neal M., Grizzle, William, van Diest, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4612256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15371645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/350752
_version_ 1782396148402618368
author Ploeger, Lennert S.
Beliën, Jeroen A.M.
Poulin, Neal M.
Grizzle, William
van Diest, Paul J.
author_facet Ploeger, Lennert S.
Beliën, Jeroen A.M.
Poulin, Neal M.
Grizzle, William
van Diest, Paul J.
author_sort Ploeger, Lennert S.
collection PubMed
description Background: Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) provides the opportunity to perform 3D DNA content measurements on intact cells in thick histological sections. So far, sample size has been limited by the time consuming nature of the technology. Since the power of DNA histograms to resolve different stemlines depends on both the sample size and the coefficient of variation (CV) of histogram peaks, interpretation of 3D CLSM DNA histograms might be hampered by both a small sample size and a large CV. The aim of this study was to analyze the required CV for 3D CLSM DNA histograms given a realistic sample size. Methods: By computer simulation, virtual histograms were composed for sample sizes of 20000, 10000, 5000, 1000, and 273 cells and CVs of 30, 25, 20, 15, 10 and 5%. By visual inspection, the histogram quality with respect to resolution of G0/1 and G2/M peaks of a diploid stemline was assessed. Results: As expected, the interpretability of DNA histograms deteriorated with decreasing sample sizes and higher CVs. For CVs of 15% and lower, a clearly bimodal peak pattern with well distinguishable G0/1 and G2/M peaks were still seen at a sample size of 273 cells, which is our current average sample size with 3D CLSM DNA cytometry. Conclusions: For unambiguous interpretation of DNA histograms obtained using 3D CLSM, a CV of at most 15% is tolerable at currently achievable sample sizes. To resolve smaller near diploid stemlines, a CV of 10% or better should be aimed at. With currently available 3D imaging technology, this CV is achievable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4612256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46122562016-01-12 Confocal 3D DNA Cytometry: Assessment of Required Coefficient of Variation by Computer Simulation Ploeger, Lennert S. Beliën, Jeroen A.M. Poulin, Neal M. Grizzle, William van Diest, Paul J. Cell Oncol Other Background: Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) provides the opportunity to perform 3D DNA content measurements on intact cells in thick histological sections. So far, sample size has been limited by the time consuming nature of the technology. Since the power of DNA histograms to resolve different stemlines depends on both the sample size and the coefficient of variation (CV) of histogram peaks, interpretation of 3D CLSM DNA histograms might be hampered by both a small sample size and a large CV. The aim of this study was to analyze the required CV for 3D CLSM DNA histograms given a realistic sample size. Methods: By computer simulation, virtual histograms were composed for sample sizes of 20000, 10000, 5000, 1000, and 273 cells and CVs of 30, 25, 20, 15, 10 and 5%. By visual inspection, the histogram quality with respect to resolution of G0/1 and G2/M peaks of a diploid stemline was assessed. Results: As expected, the interpretability of DNA histograms deteriorated with decreasing sample sizes and higher CVs. For CVs of 15% and lower, a clearly bimodal peak pattern with well distinguishable G0/1 and G2/M peaks were still seen at a sample size of 273 cells, which is our current average sample size with 3D CLSM DNA cytometry. Conclusions: For unambiguous interpretation of DNA histograms obtained using 3D CLSM, a CV of at most 15% is tolerable at currently achievable sample sizes. To resolve smaller near diploid stemlines, a CV of 10% or better should be aimed at. With currently available 3D imaging technology, this CV is achievable. IOS Press 2004 2004-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4612256/ /pubmed/15371645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/350752 Text en Copyright © 2004 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors.
spellingShingle Other
Ploeger, Lennert S.
Beliën, Jeroen A.M.
Poulin, Neal M.
Grizzle, William
van Diest, Paul J.
Confocal 3D DNA Cytometry: Assessment of Required Coefficient of Variation by Computer Simulation
title Confocal 3D DNA Cytometry: Assessment of Required Coefficient of Variation by Computer Simulation
title_full Confocal 3D DNA Cytometry: Assessment of Required Coefficient of Variation by Computer Simulation
title_fullStr Confocal 3D DNA Cytometry: Assessment of Required Coefficient of Variation by Computer Simulation
title_full_unstemmed Confocal 3D DNA Cytometry: Assessment of Required Coefficient of Variation by Computer Simulation
title_short Confocal 3D DNA Cytometry: Assessment of Required Coefficient of Variation by Computer Simulation
title_sort confocal 3d dna cytometry: assessment of required coefficient of variation by computer simulation
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4612256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15371645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/350752
work_keys_str_mv AT ploegerlennerts confocal3ddnacytometryassessmentofrequiredcoefficientofvariationbycomputersimulation
AT belienjeroenam confocal3ddnacytometryassessmentofrequiredcoefficientofvariationbycomputersimulation
AT poulinnealm confocal3ddnacytometryassessmentofrequiredcoefficientofvariationbycomputersimulation
AT grizzlewilliam confocal3ddnacytometryassessmentofrequiredcoefficientofvariationbycomputersimulation
AT vandiestpaulj confocal3ddnacytometryassessmentofrequiredcoefficientofvariationbycomputersimulation