Cargando…
Cardiovascular imaging: what have we learned from animal models?
Cardiovascular imaging has become an indispensable tool for patient diagnosis and follow up. Probably the wide clinical applications of imaging are due to the possibility of a detailed and high quality description and quantification of cardiovascular system structure and function. Also phenomena tha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4612690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26539113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2015.00227 |
_version_ | 1782396203220074496 |
---|---|
author | Santos, Arnoldo Fernández-Friera, Leticia Villalba, María López-Melgar, Beatriz España, Samuel Mateo, Jesús Mota, Ruben A. Jiménez-Borreguero, Jesús Ruiz-Cabello, Jesús |
author_facet | Santos, Arnoldo Fernández-Friera, Leticia Villalba, María López-Melgar, Beatriz España, Samuel Mateo, Jesús Mota, Ruben A. Jiménez-Borreguero, Jesús Ruiz-Cabello, Jesús |
author_sort | Santos, Arnoldo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cardiovascular imaging has become an indispensable tool for patient diagnosis and follow up. Probably the wide clinical applications of imaging are due to the possibility of a detailed and high quality description and quantification of cardiovascular system structure and function. Also phenomena that involve complex physiological mechanisms and biochemical pathways, such as inflammation and ischemia, can be visualized in a non-destructive way. The widespread use and evolution of imaging would not have been possible without animal studies. Animal models have allowed for instance, (i) the technical development of different imaging tools, (ii) to test hypothesis generated from human studies and finally, (iii) to evaluate the translational relevance assessment of in vitro and ex-vivo results. In this review, we will critically describe the contribution of animal models to the use of biomedical imaging in cardiovascular medicine. We will discuss the characteristics of the most frequent models used in/for imaging studies. We will cover the major findings of animal studies focused in the cardiovascular use of the repeatedly used imaging techniques in clinical practice and experimental studies. We will also describe the physiological findings and/or learning processes for imaging applications coming from models of the most common cardiovascular diseases. In these diseases, imaging research using animals has allowed the study of aspects such as: ventricular size, shape, global function, and wall thickening, local myocardial function, myocardial perfusion, metabolism and energetic assessment, infarct quantification, vascular lesion characterization, myocardial fiber structure, and myocardial calcium uptake. Finally we will discuss the limitations and future of imaging research with animal models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4612690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46126902015-11-04 Cardiovascular imaging: what have we learned from animal models? Santos, Arnoldo Fernández-Friera, Leticia Villalba, María López-Melgar, Beatriz España, Samuel Mateo, Jesús Mota, Ruben A. Jiménez-Borreguero, Jesús Ruiz-Cabello, Jesús Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Cardiovascular imaging has become an indispensable tool for patient diagnosis and follow up. Probably the wide clinical applications of imaging are due to the possibility of a detailed and high quality description and quantification of cardiovascular system structure and function. Also phenomena that involve complex physiological mechanisms and biochemical pathways, such as inflammation and ischemia, can be visualized in a non-destructive way. The widespread use and evolution of imaging would not have been possible without animal studies. Animal models have allowed for instance, (i) the technical development of different imaging tools, (ii) to test hypothesis generated from human studies and finally, (iii) to evaluate the translational relevance assessment of in vitro and ex-vivo results. In this review, we will critically describe the contribution of animal models to the use of biomedical imaging in cardiovascular medicine. We will discuss the characteristics of the most frequent models used in/for imaging studies. We will cover the major findings of animal studies focused in the cardiovascular use of the repeatedly used imaging techniques in clinical practice and experimental studies. We will also describe the physiological findings and/or learning processes for imaging applications coming from models of the most common cardiovascular diseases. In these diseases, imaging research using animals has allowed the study of aspects such as: ventricular size, shape, global function, and wall thickening, local myocardial function, myocardial perfusion, metabolism and energetic assessment, infarct quantification, vascular lesion characterization, myocardial fiber structure, and myocardial calcium uptake. Finally we will discuss the limitations and future of imaging research with animal models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4612690/ /pubmed/26539113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2015.00227 Text en Copyright © 2015 Santos, Fernández-Friera, Villalba, López-Melgar, España, Mateo, Mota, Jiménez-Borreguero and Ruiz-Cabello. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Santos, Arnoldo Fernández-Friera, Leticia Villalba, María López-Melgar, Beatriz España, Samuel Mateo, Jesús Mota, Ruben A. Jiménez-Borreguero, Jesús Ruiz-Cabello, Jesús Cardiovascular imaging: what have we learned from animal models? |
title | Cardiovascular imaging: what have we learned from animal models? |
title_full | Cardiovascular imaging: what have we learned from animal models? |
title_fullStr | Cardiovascular imaging: what have we learned from animal models? |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiovascular imaging: what have we learned from animal models? |
title_short | Cardiovascular imaging: what have we learned from animal models? |
title_sort | cardiovascular imaging: what have we learned from animal models? |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4612690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26539113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2015.00227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santosarnoldo cardiovascularimagingwhathavewelearnedfromanimalmodels AT fernandezfrieraleticia cardiovascularimagingwhathavewelearnedfromanimalmodels AT villalbamaria cardiovascularimagingwhathavewelearnedfromanimalmodels AT lopezmelgarbeatriz cardiovascularimagingwhathavewelearnedfromanimalmodels AT espanasamuel cardiovascularimagingwhathavewelearnedfromanimalmodels AT mateojesus cardiovascularimagingwhathavewelearnedfromanimalmodels AT motarubena cardiovascularimagingwhathavewelearnedfromanimalmodels AT jimenezborreguerojesus cardiovascularimagingwhathavewelearnedfromanimalmodels AT ruizcabellojesus cardiovascularimagingwhathavewelearnedfromanimalmodels |