Cargando…
Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction
BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are ischemic emergencies. Guidelines recommend care delivery within formally regionalized systems of care at designated centers, with bypass of nearby centers of lesser or no designation. We review the evi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.398 |
_version_ | 1782396351596724224 |
---|---|
author | Rhudy, James P. Bakitas, Marie A. Hyrkäs, Kristiina Jablonski‐Jaudon, Rita A. Pryor, Erica R. Wang, Henry E. Alexandrov, Anne W. |
author_facet | Rhudy, James P. Bakitas, Marie A. Hyrkäs, Kristiina Jablonski‐Jaudon, Rita A. Pryor, Erica R. Wang, Henry E. Alexandrov, Anne W. |
author_sort | Rhudy, James P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are ischemic emergencies. Guidelines recommend care delivery within formally regionalized systems of care at designated centers, with bypass of nearby centers of lesser or no designation. We review the evidence of the effectiveness of regionalized systems in AIS and STEMI. METHODS: Literature was searched using terms corresponding to designation of AIS and STEMI systems and from 2010 to the present. Inclusion criteria included report of an outcome on any dependent variable mentioned in the rationale for regionalization in the guidelines and an independent variable comparing care to a non‐ or pre‐regionalized system. Designation was defined in the AIS case as certification by the Joint Commission as either a primary (PSC) or comprehensive (CSC) stroke center. In the STEMI case, the search was conducted linking “regionalization” and “myocardial infarction” or citation as a model system by any American Heart Association statement. RESULTS: For AIS, 17 publications met these criteria and were selected for review. In the STEMI case, four publications met these criteria; the search was therefore expanded by relaxing the criteria to include any historical or anecdotal comparison to a pre‐ or nonregionalized state. The final yield was nine papers from six systems. CONCLUSION: Although regionalized care results in enhanced process and reduced unadjusted rates of disparity in access and adverse outcomes, these differences tend to become nonsignificant when adjusted for delayed presentation and hospital arrival by means other than emergency medical services. The benefits of regionalized care occur along with a temporal trend of improvement due to uptake of quality initiatives and guideline recommendations by all systems regardless of designation. Further research is justified with a randomized registry or cluster randomized design to support or refute recommendations that regionalization should be the standard of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4614047 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46140472015-10-29 Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction Rhudy, James P. Bakitas, Marie A. Hyrkäs, Kristiina Jablonski‐Jaudon, Rita A. Pryor, Erica R. Wang, Henry E. Alexandrov, Anne W. Brain Behav Reviews BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are ischemic emergencies. Guidelines recommend care delivery within formally regionalized systems of care at designated centers, with bypass of nearby centers of lesser or no designation. We review the evidence of the effectiveness of regionalized systems in AIS and STEMI. METHODS: Literature was searched using terms corresponding to designation of AIS and STEMI systems and from 2010 to the present. Inclusion criteria included report of an outcome on any dependent variable mentioned in the rationale for regionalization in the guidelines and an independent variable comparing care to a non‐ or pre‐regionalized system. Designation was defined in the AIS case as certification by the Joint Commission as either a primary (PSC) or comprehensive (CSC) stroke center. In the STEMI case, the search was conducted linking “regionalization” and “myocardial infarction” or citation as a model system by any American Heart Association statement. RESULTS: For AIS, 17 publications met these criteria and were selected for review. In the STEMI case, four publications met these criteria; the search was therefore expanded by relaxing the criteria to include any historical or anecdotal comparison to a pre‐ or nonregionalized state. The final yield was nine papers from six systems. CONCLUSION: Although regionalized care results in enhanced process and reduced unadjusted rates of disparity in access and adverse outcomes, these differences tend to become nonsignificant when adjusted for delayed presentation and hospital arrival by means other than emergency medical services. The benefits of regionalized care occur along with a temporal trend of improvement due to uptake of quality initiatives and guideline recommendations by all systems regardless of designation. Further research is justified with a randomized registry or cluster randomized design to support or refute recommendations that regionalization should be the standard of care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4614047/ /pubmed/26516616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.398 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Rhudy, James P. Bakitas, Marie A. Hyrkäs, Kristiina Jablonski‐Jaudon, Rita A. Pryor, Erica R. Wang, Henry E. Alexandrov, Anne W. Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction |
title | Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction |
title_full | Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction |
title_short | Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction |
title_sort | effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rhudyjamesp effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction AT bakitasmariea effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction AT hyrkaskristiina effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction AT jablonskijaudonritaa effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction AT pryorericar effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction AT wanghenrye effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction AT alexandrovannew effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction |