Cargando…

Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are ischemic emergencies. Guidelines recommend care delivery within formally regionalized systems of care at designated centers, with bypass of nearby centers of lesser or no designation. We review the evi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhudy, James P., Bakitas, Marie A., Hyrkäs, Kristiina, Jablonski‐Jaudon, Rita A., Pryor, Erica R., Wang, Henry E., Alexandrov, Anne W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.398
_version_ 1782396351596724224
author Rhudy, James P.
Bakitas, Marie A.
Hyrkäs, Kristiina
Jablonski‐Jaudon, Rita A.
Pryor, Erica R.
Wang, Henry E.
Alexandrov, Anne W.
author_facet Rhudy, James P.
Bakitas, Marie A.
Hyrkäs, Kristiina
Jablonski‐Jaudon, Rita A.
Pryor, Erica R.
Wang, Henry E.
Alexandrov, Anne W.
author_sort Rhudy, James P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are ischemic emergencies. Guidelines recommend care delivery within formally regionalized systems of care at designated centers, with bypass of nearby centers of lesser or no designation. We review the evidence of the effectiveness of regionalized systems in AIS and STEMI. METHODS: Literature was searched using terms corresponding to designation of AIS and STEMI systems and from 2010 to the present. Inclusion criteria included report of an outcome on any dependent variable mentioned in the rationale for regionalization in the guidelines and an independent variable comparing care to a non‐ or pre‐regionalized system. Designation was defined in the AIS case as certification by the Joint Commission as either a primary (PSC) or comprehensive (CSC) stroke center. In the STEMI case, the search was conducted linking “regionalization” and “myocardial infarction” or citation as a model system by any American Heart Association statement. RESULTS: For AIS, 17 publications met these criteria and were selected for review. In the STEMI case, four publications met these criteria; the search was therefore expanded by relaxing the criteria to include any historical or anecdotal comparison to a pre‐ or nonregionalized state. The final yield was nine papers from six systems. CONCLUSION: Although regionalized care results in enhanced process and reduced unadjusted rates of disparity in access and adverse outcomes, these differences tend to become nonsignificant when adjusted for delayed presentation and hospital arrival by means other than emergency medical services. The benefits of regionalized care occur along with a temporal trend of improvement due to uptake of quality initiatives and guideline recommendations by all systems regardless of designation. Further research is justified with a randomized registry or cluster randomized design to support or refute recommendations that regionalization should be the standard of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4614047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46140472015-10-29 Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction Rhudy, James P. Bakitas, Marie A. Hyrkäs, Kristiina Jablonski‐Jaudon, Rita A. Pryor, Erica R. Wang, Henry E. Alexandrov, Anne W. Brain Behav Reviews BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are ischemic emergencies. Guidelines recommend care delivery within formally regionalized systems of care at designated centers, with bypass of nearby centers of lesser or no designation. We review the evidence of the effectiveness of regionalized systems in AIS and STEMI. METHODS: Literature was searched using terms corresponding to designation of AIS and STEMI systems and from 2010 to the present. Inclusion criteria included report of an outcome on any dependent variable mentioned in the rationale for regionalization in the guidelines and an independent variable comparing care to a non‐ or pre‐regionalized system. Designation was defined in the AIS case as certification by the Joint Commission as either a primary (PSC) or comprehensive (CSC) stroke center. In the STEMI case, the search was conducted linking “regionalization” and “myocardial infarction” or citation as a model system by any American Heart Association statement. RESULTS: For AIS, 17 publications met these criteria and were selected for review. In the STEMI case, four publications met these criteria; the search was therefore expanded by relaxing the criteria to include any historical or anecdotal comparison to a pre‐ or nonregionalized state. The final yield was nine papers from six systems. CONCLUSION: Although regionalized care results in enhanced process and reduced unadjusted rates of disparity in access and adverse outcomes, these differences tend to become nonsignificant when adjusted for delayed presentation and hospital arrival by means other than emergency medical services. The benefits of regionalized care occur along with a temporal trend of improvement due to uptake of quality initiatives and guideline recommendations by all systems regardless of designation. Further research is justified with a randomized registry or cluster randomized design to support or refute recommendations that regionalization should be the standard of care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4614047/ /pubmed/26516616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.398 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Rhudy, James P.
Bakitas, Marie A.
Hyrkäs, Kristiina
Jablonski‐Jaudon, Rita A.
Pryor, Erica R.
Wang, Henry E.
Alexandrov, Anne W.
Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction
title Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction
title_full Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction
title_short Effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction
title_sort effectiveness of regionalized systems for stroke and myocardial infarction
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26516616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.398
work_keys_str_mv AT rhudyjamesp effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction
AT bakitasmariea effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction
AT hyrkaskristiina effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction
AT jablonskijaudonritaa effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction
AT pryorericar effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction
AT wanghenrye effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction
AT alexandrovannew effectivenessofregionalizedsystemsforstrokeandmyocardialinfarction