Cargando…

Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Confirmation of Adequate Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures

INTRODUCTION: Restoration of normal anatomic alignment is a key component of the treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) in determining the adequacy of closed reduction in these fractures. METHODS: DRF patients admitted to the eme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esmailian, Mehrdad, Haj Zargarbashi, Ehsan, Masoumi, Babak, Karami, Mehdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495328
_version_ 1782396399124480000
author Esmailian, Mehrdad
Haj Zargarbashi, Ehsan
Masoumi, Babak
Karami, Mehdi
author_facet Esmailian, Mehrdad
Haj Zargarbashi, Ehsan
Masoumi, Babak
Karami, Mehdi
author_sort Esmailian, Mehrdad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Restoration of normal anatomic alignment is a key component of the treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) in determining the adequacy of closed reduction in these fractures. METHODS: DRF patients admitted to the emergency department of Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran from September 2011 to 2012, were enrolled. After closed reduction, the adequacy was investigated through both US and control plain radiography. Then, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicative values of US in confirmation of closed reduction was evaluated. In addition, inter-rater agreement between the two diagnostic tools was analyzed by calculating Cohen’s kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Finally, 154 patients were evaluated (females: 53.9%) with mean age of 40.03±14.7 (range: 22-73). US had sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 99.3% (95%CI: 96.2-99.9), 100.0% (95%CI: 62.9-100.0), 100.0% (95%CI: 97.5-100.0), and 88.9% (95%CI: 51.7-98.1) in confirmation of the adequate reduction, respectively. In addition, inter-rater reliability was 0.94 (95%CI: 0.89-0.99; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: It seems that US could be considered as a highly sensitive, accurate, easy to use, noninvasive and safe tool for guidance and confirmation of closed reduction in DRF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4614559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46145592015-10-22 Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Confirmation of Adequate Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures Esmailian, Mehrdad Haj Zargarbashi, Ehsan Masoumi, Babak Karami, Mehdi Emerg (Tehran) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Restoration of normal anatomic alignment is a key component of the treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) in determining the adequacy of closed reduction in these fractures. METHODS: DRF patients admitted to the emergency department of Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran from September 2011 to 2012, were enrolled. After closed reduction, the adequacy was investigated through both US and control plain radiography. Then, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicative values of US in confirmation of closed reduction was evaluated. In addition, inter-rater agreement between the two diagnostic tools was analyzed by calculating Cohen’s kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Finally, 154 patients were evaluated (females: 53.9%) with mean age of 40.03±14.7 (range: 22-73). US had sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 99.3% (95%CI: 96.2-99.9), 100.0% (95%CI: 62.9-100.0), 100.0% (95%CI: 97.5-100.0), and 88.9% (95%CI: 51.7-98.1) in confirmation of the adequate reduction, respectively. In addition, inter-rater reliability was 0.94 (95%CI: 0.89-0.99; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: It seems that US could be considered as a highly sensitive, accurate, easy to use, noninvasive and safe tool for guidance and confirmation of closed reduction in DRF. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4614559/ /pubmed/26495328 Text en © 2013 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/)which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Research
Esmailian, Mehrdad
Haj Zargarbashi, Ehsan
Masoumi, Babak
Karami, Mehdi
Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Confirmation of Adequate Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures
title Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Confirmation of Adequate Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures
title_full Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Confirmation of Adequate Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures
title_fullStr Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Confirmation of Adequate Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Confirmation of Adequate Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures
title_short Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Confirmation of Adequate Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures
title_sort accuracy of ultrasonography in confirmation of adequate reduction of distal radius fractures
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495328
work_keys_str_mv AT esmailianmehrdad accuracyofultrasonographyinconfirmationofadequatereductionofdistalradiusfractures
AT hajzargarbashiehsan accuracyofultrasonographyinconfirmationofadequatereductionofdistalradiusfractures
AT masoumibabak accuracyofultrasonographyinconfirmationofadequatereductionofdistalradiusfractures
AT karamimehdi accuracyofultrasonographyinconfirmationofadequatereductionofdistalradiusfractures