Cargando…

Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION: Motion artifacts are a common problem in pediatric radiographic studies and are a common indication for pediatric procedural sedation. This study aimed to compare the combination of oral midazolam and ketamine (OMK) with oral midazolam alone (OM) as procedural sedatives among children...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majidinejad, Saeed, Taherian, Keramat, Esmailian, Mehrdad, Khazaei, Mehdi, Samaie, Vajihe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495384
_version_ 1782396408754601984
author Majidinejad, Saeed
Taherian, Keramat
Esmailian, Mehrdad
Khazaei, Mehdi
Samaie, Vajihe
author_facet Majidinejad, Saeed
Taherian, Keramat
Esmailian, Mehrdad
Khazaei, Mehdi
Samaie, Vajihe
author_sort Majidinejad, Saeed
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Motion artifacts are a common problem in pediatric radiographic studies and are a common indication for pediatric procedural sedation. This study aimed to compare the combination of oral midazolam and ketamine (OMK) with oral midazolam alone (OM) as procedural sedatives among children undergoing computed tomography (CT) imaging. METHODS: The study population was comprised of six-month to six-year old patients with medium-risk minor head trauma, who were scheduled to undergo brain CT imaging. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups: one group received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam (OM group; n = 33) orally and the other one received 0.2 mg/kg midazolam and 5 mg/kg ketamine orally (OMK group; n=33). The vital signs were monitored and recorded at regular intervals. The primary outcome measure was the success rate of each drug in achieving adequate sedation. Secondary outcome measures were the time to achieve adequate sedation, time to discharge from radiology department, and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Adequate sedation was achieved in five patients (15.2%) in OM group and 15 patients (45.5%) in OMK group, which showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.015). No significant difference was noted between OM and OMK groups with respect to the time of achieving adequate sedation (33.80 ± 7.56 and 32.87 ± 10.18 minutes, respectively; p = 0.854) and the time of discharging from radiology department (89.60 ± 30.22 and 105.27 ± 21.98 minutes, respectively; p=0.223). The complications were minor and similar among patients of both groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that in comparison with OM, OMK was more effective in producing a satisfactory level of sedation in children undergoing CT examinations without additional complications; however, none of these two regimens fulfilled clinical needs for procedural sedation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4614601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46146012015-10-22 Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial Majidinejad, Saeed Taherian, Keramat Esmailian, Mehrdad Khazaei, Mehdi Samaie, Vajihe Emerg (Tehran) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Motion artifacts are a common problem in pediatric radiographic studies and are a common indication for pediatric procedural sedation. This study aimed to compare the combination of oral midazolam and ketamine (OMK) with oral midazolam alone (OM) as procedural sedatives among children undergoing computed tomography (CT) imaging. METHODS: The study population was comprised of six-month to six-year old patients with medium-risk minor head trauma, who were scheduled to undergo brain CT imaging. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups: one group received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam (OM group; n = 33) orally and the other one received 0.2 mg/kg midazolam and 5 mg/kg ketamine orally (OMK group; n=33). The vital signs were monitored and recorded at regular intervals. The primary outcome measure was the success rate of each drug in achieving adequate sedation. Secondary outcome measures were the time to achieve adequate sedation, time to discharge from radiology department, and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Adequate sedation was achieved in five patients (15.2%) in OM group and 15 patients (45.5%) in OMK group, which showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.015). No significant difference was noted between OM and OMK groups with respect to the time of achieving adequate sedation (33.80 ± 7.56 and 32.87 ± 10.18 minutes, respectively; p = 0.854) and the time of discharging from radiology department (89.60 ± 30.22 and 105.27 ± 21.98 minutes, respectively; p=0.223). The complications were minor and similar among patients of both groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that in comparison with OM, OMK was more effective in producing a satisfactory level of sedation in children undergoing CT examinations without additional complications; however, none of these two regimens fulfilled clinical needs for procedural sedation. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4614601/ /pubmed/26495384 Text en © 2015 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/)which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Research
Majidinejad, Saeed
Taherian, Keramat
Esmailian, Mehrdad
Khazaei, Mehdi
Samaie, Vajihe
Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial
title Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort oral midazolam-ketamine versus midazolam alone for procedural sedation of children undergoing computed tomography; a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495384
work_keys_str_mv AT majidinejadsaeed oralmidazolamketamineversusmidazolamaloneforproceduralsedationofchildrenundergoingcomputedtomographyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT taheriankeramat oralmidazolamketamineversusmidazolamaloneforproceduralsedationofchildrenundergoingcomputedtomographyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT esmailianmehrdad oralmidazolamketamineversusmidazolamaloneforproceduralsedationofchildrenundergoingcomputedtomographyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT khazaeimehdi oralmidazolamketamineversusmidazolamaloneforproceduralsedationofchildrenundergoingcomputedtomographyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT samaievajihe oralmidazolamketamineversusmidazolamaloneforproceduralsedationofchildrenundergoingcomputedtomographyarandomizedclinicaltrial