Cargando…
Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification
Ecological intensification has been promoted as a means to achieve environmentally sustainable increases in crop yields by enhancing ecosystem functions that regulate and support production. There is, however, little direct evidence of yield benefits from ecological intensification on commercial far...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26423846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1740 |
_version_ | 1782396428481462272 |
---|---|
author | Pywell, Richard F. Heard, Matthew S. Woodcock, Ben A. Hinsley, Shelley Ridding, Lucy Nowakowski, Marek Bullock, James M. |
author_facet | Pywell, Richard F. Heard, Matthew S. Woodcock, Ben A. Hinsley, Shelley Ridding, Lucy Nowakowski, Marek Bullock, James M. |
author_sort | Pywell, Richard F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ecological intensification has been promoted as a means to achieve environmentally sustainable increases in crop yields by enhancing ecosystem functions that regulate and support production. There is, however, little direct evidence of yield benefits from ecological intensification on commercial farms growing globally important foodstuffs (grains, oilseeds and pulses). We replicated two treatments removing 3 or 8% of land at the field edge from production to create wildlife habitat in 50–60 ha patches over a 900 ha commercial arable farm in central England, and compared these to a business as usual control (no land removed). In the control fields, crop yields were reduced by as much as 38% at the field edge. Habitat creation in these lower yielding areas led to increased yield in the cropped areas of the fields, and this positive effect became more pronounced over 6 years. As a consequence, yields at the field scale were maintained—and, indeed, enhanced for some crops—despite the loss of cropland for habitat creation. These results suggested that over a 5-year crop rotation, there would be no adverse impact on overall yield in terms of monetary value or nutritional energy. This study provides a clear demonstration that wildlife-friendly management which supports ecosystem services is compatible with, and can even increase, crop yields. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4614778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46147782015-11-02 Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification Pywell, Richard F. Heard, Matthew S. Woodcock, Ben A. Hinsley, Shelley Ridding, Lucy Nowakowski, Marek Bullock, James M. Proc Biol Sci Research Articles Ecological intensification has been promoted as a means to achieve environmentally sustainable increases in crop yields by enhancing ecosystem functions that regulate and support production. There is, however, little direct evidence of yield benefits from ecological intensification on commercial farms growing globally important foodstuffs (grains, oilseeds and pulses). We replicated two treatments removing 3 or 8% of land at the field edge from production to create wildlife habitat in 50–60 ha patches over a 900 ha commercial arable farm in central England, and compared these to a business as usual control (no land removed). In the control fields, crop yields were reduced by as much as 38% at the field edge. Habitat creation in these lower yielding areas led to increased yield in the cropped areas of the fields, and this positive effect became more pronounced over 6 years. As a consequence, yields at the field scale were maintained—and, indeed, enhanced for some crops—despite the loss of cropland for habitat creation. These results suggested that over a 5-year crop rotation, there would be no adverse impact on overall yield in terms of monetary value or nutritional energy. This study provides a clear demonstration that wildlife-friendly management which supports ecosystem services is compatible with, and can even increase, crop yields. The Royal Society 2015-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4614778/ /pubmed/26423846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1740 Text en © 2015 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Pywell, Richard F. Heard, Matthew S. Woodcock, Ben A. Hinsley, Shelley Ridding, Lucy Nowakowski, Marek Bullock, James M. Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification |
title | Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification |
title_full | Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification |
title_fullStr | Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification |
title_full_unstemmed | Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification |
title_short | Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification |
title_sort | wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26423846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1740 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pywellrichardf wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification AT heardmatthews wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification AT woodcockbena wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification AT hinsleyshelley wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification AT riddinglucy wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification AT nowakowskimarek wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification AT bullockjamesm wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification |