Cargando…

Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification

Ecological intensification has been promoted as a means to achieve environmentally sustainable increases in crop yields by enhancing ecosystem functions that regulate and support production. There is, however, little direct evidence of yield benefits from ecological intensification on commercial far...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pywell, Richard F., Heard, Matthew S., Woodcock, Ben A., Hinsley, Shelley, Ridding, Lucy, Nowakowski, Marek, Bullock, James M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26423846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1740
_version_ 1782396428481462272
author Pywell, Richard F.
Heard, Matthew S.
Woodcock, Ben A.
Hinsley, Shelley
Ridding, Lucy
Nowakowski, Marek
Bullock, James M.
author_facet Pywell, Richard F.
Heard, Matthew S.
Woodcock, Ben A.
Hinsley, Shelley
Ridding, Lucy
Nowakowski, Marek
Bullock, James M.
author_sort Pywell, Richard F.
collection PubMed
description Ecological intensification has been promoted as a means to achieve environmentally sustainable increases in crop yields by enhancing ecosystem functions that regulate and support production. There is, however, little direct evidence of yield benefits from ecological intensification on commercial farms growing globally important foodstuffs (grains, oilseeds and pulses). We replicated two treatments removing 3 or 8% of land at the field edge from production to create wildlife habitat in 50–60 ha patches over a 900 ha commercial arable farm in central England, and compared these to a business as usual control (no land removed). In the control fields, crop yields were reduced by as much as 38% at the field edge. Habitat creation in these lower yielding areas led to increased yield in the cropped areas of the fields, and this positive effect became more pronounced over 6 years. As a consequence, yields at the field scale were maintained—and, indeed, enhanced for some crops—despite the loss of cropland for habitat creation. These results suggested that over a 5-year crop rotation, there would be no adverse impact on overall yield in terms of monetary value or nutritional energy. This study provides a clear demonstration that wildlife-friendly management which supports ecosystem services is compatible with, and can even increase, crop yields.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4614778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46147782015-11-02 Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification Pywell, Richard F. Heard, Matthew S. Woodcock, Ben A. Hinsley, Shelley Ridding, Lucy Nowakowski, Marek Bullock, James M. Proc Biol Sci Research Articles Ecological intensification has been promoted as a means to achieve environmentally sustainable increases in crop yields by enhancing ecosystem functions that regulate and support production. There is, however, little direct evidence of yield benefits from ecological intensification on commercial farms growing globally important foodstuffs (grains, oilseeds and pulses). We replicated two treatments removing 3 or 8% of land at the field edge from production to create wildlife habitat in 50–60 ha patches over a 900 ha commercial arable farm in central England, and compared these to a business as usual control (no land removed). In the control fields, crop yields were reduced by as much as 38% at the field edge. Habitat creation in these lower yielding areas led to increased yield in the cropped areas of the fields, and this positive effect became more pronounced over 6 years. As a consequence, yields at the field scale were maintained—and, indeed, enhanced for some crops—despite the loss of cropland for habitat creation. These results suggested that over a 5-year crop rotation, there would be no adverse impact on overall yield in terms of monetary value or nutritional energy. This study provides a clear demonstration that wildlife-friendly management which supports ecosystem services is compatible with, and can even increase, crop yields. The Royal Society 2015-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4614778/ /pubmed/26423846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1740 Text en © 2015 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Pywell, Richard F.
Heard, Matthew S.
Woodcock, Ben A.
Hinsley, Shelley
Ridding, Lucy
Nowakowski, Marek
Bullock, James M.
Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification
title Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification
title_full Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification
title_fullStr Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification
title_full_unstemmed Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification
title_short Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification
title_sort wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26423846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1740
work_keys_str_mv AT pywellrichardf wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification
AT heardmatthews wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification
AT woodcockbena wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification
AT hinsleyshelley wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification
AT riddinglucy wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification
AT nowakowskimarek wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification
AT bullockjamesm wildlifefriendlyfarmingincreasescropyieldevidenceforecologicalintensification