Cargando…

Heterogeneity of DNA Distribution in Diploid Cells: A New Predicitive Discriminant Factor for Solid Tumour Behaviour

Spatial nuclear DNA heterogeneity distribution of Feulgen‐stained DNA diploid cells was studied by image cytometry in voided urine of 119 patients without bladder tumour (n=20) and with initial (n=23) or previous (n=76) diagnosed bladder tumour. For each patient, repetitive DNA measurements were per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assailly, Jacques, Desgrippes, Arnaud, Loridon‐Rosa, Brigitte, Piron, Dominique, Dachez, Roger, Beurton, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10468407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/182468
_version_ 1782396461966688256
author Assailly, Jacques
Desgrippes, Arnaud
Loridon‐Rosa, Brigitte
Piron, Dominique
Dachez, Roger
Beurton, Daniel
author_facet Assailly, Jacques
Desgrippes, Arnaud
Loridon‐Rosa, Brigitte
Piron, Dominique
Dachez, Roger
Beurton, Daniel
author_sort Assailly, Jacques
collection PubMed
description Spatial nuclear DNA heterogeneity distribution of Feulgen‐stained DNA diploid cells was studied by image cytometry in voided urine of 119 patients without bladder tumour (n=20) and with initial (n=23) or previous (n=76) diagnosed bladder tumour. For each patient, repetitive DNA measurements were performed during 1–4 years of follow up. Only cells of diploid DNA histograms and diploid subpopulations of aneuploid DNA histograms were used for analysis. DNA heterogeneity distribution of these diploid cells was quantified by statistical parameters of each nuclear optical density distribution. Discriminant analysis was performed on three groups of DNA histograms. Group A (n=44): aneuploid DNA histograms of patients with bladder tumour. Group D (n=55): 38 diploid DNA histograms of the 20 patients without bladder tumour (subgroup D1) and 17 diploid DNA histograms of patients with a non‐recurrent bladder tumour (subgroup D2). Group R (n=27): diploid DNA histograms of patients with bladder tumour recurrence. No statistically significant discriminant function was found to separate D1 and D2. However, the first canonical discriminant function C1 differentiated diploid cells of diploid DNA histograms (group D and group R) from diploid cell subpopulations of aneuploid DNA histograms (group A). Mean C1 values were 1.06, 0.84 and –1.45 for groups R, D and A, respectively. The second canonical discriminant function C2 differentiated diploid DNA histograms of patients with bladder tumour recurrence (group R) from diploid DNA histograms of patients without bladder tumour or without bladder tumour recurrence (group D). Mean C2 values were 1.78 and –0.76 for groups R and D, respectively. In 95% confidence limit, the rate of rediscrimination using the two first canonical discriminant functions C1 and C2 were 86.4, 74.5 and 74.1% for groups A, D and R, respectively. Percent of “grouped” cases correctly classified was 78.6%. Thus spatial DNA heterogeneity distribution of diploid cells seems to quantitate probable genetic instability as a function of clinical evolution such as tumour recurrence, and suggests the possible presence of aneuploid stemlines in a heterogeneous tumour, even if a diploid DNA histogram is observed in a single sample. From standardized C1 and C2 canonical discriminant function coefficients, a DNA heterogeneity index (2c‐HI) is proposed to characterize diploid cells providing a descriptive and predictive discriminant factor for solid tumour behaviour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4615146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46151462016-01-12 Heterogeneity of DNA Distribution in Diploid Cells: A New Predicitive Discriminant Factor for Solid Tumour Behaviour Assailly, Jacques Desgrippes, Arnaud Loridon‐Rosa, Brigitte Piron, Dominique Dachez, Roger Beurton, Daniel Anal Cell Pathol Other Spatial nuclear DNA heterogeneity distribution of Feulgen‐stained DNA diploid cells was studied by image cytometry in voided urine of 119 patients without bladder tumour (n=20) and with initial (n=23) or previous (n=76) diagnosed bladder tumour. For each patient, repetitive DNA measurements were performed during 1–4 years of follow up. Only cells of diploid DNA histograms and diploid subpopulations of aneuploid DNA histograms were used for analysis. DNA heterogeneity distribution of these diploid cells was quantified by statistical parameters of each nuclear optical density distribution. Discriminant analysis was performed on three groups of DNA histograms. Group A (n=44): aneuploid DNA histograms of patients with bladder tumour. Group D (n=55): 38 diploid DNA histograms of the 20 patients without bladder tumour (subgroup D1) and 17 diploid DNA histograms of patients with a non‐recurrent bladder tumour (subgroup D2). Group R (n=27): diploid DNA histograms of patients with bladder tumour recurrence. No statistically significant discriminant function was found to separate D1 and D2. However, the first canonical discriminant function C1 differentiated diploid cells of diploid DNA histograms (group D and group R) from diploid cell subpopulations of aneuploid DNA histograms (group A). Mean C1 values were 1.06, 0.84 and –1.45 for groups R, D and A, respectively. The second canonical discriminant function C2 differentiated diploid DNA histograms of patients with bladder tumour recurrence (group R) from diploid DNA histograms of patients without bladder tumour or without bladder tumour recurrence (group D). Mean C2 values were 1.78 and –0.76 for groups R and D, respectively. In 95% confidence limit, the rate of rediscrimination using the two first canonical discriminant functions C1 and C2 were 86.4, 74.5 and 74.1% for groups A, D and R, respectively. Percent of “grouped” cases correctly classified was 78.6%. Thus spatial DNA heterogeneity distribution of diploid cells seems to quantitate probable genetic instability as a function of clinical evolution such as tumour recurrence, and suggests the possible presence of aneuploid stemlines in a heterogeneous tumour, even if a diploid DNA histogram is observed in a single sample. From standardized C1 and C2 canonical discriminant function coefficients, a DNA heterogeneity index (2c‐HI) is proposed to characterize diploid cells providing a descriptive and predictive discriminant factor for solid tumour behaviour. IOS Press 1999 1999-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4615146/ /pubmed/10468407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/182468 Text en Copyright © 1999 Hindawi Publishing Corporation.
spellingShingle Other
Assailly, Jacques
Desgrippes, Arnaud
Loridon‐Rosa, Brigitte
Piron, Dominique
Dachez, Roger
Beurton, Daniel
Heterogeneity of DNA Distribution in Diploid Cells: A New Predicitive Discriminant Factor for Solid Tumour Behaviour
title Heterogeneity of DNA Distribution in Diploid Cells: A New Predicitive Discriminant Factor for Solid Tumour Behaviour
title_full Heterogeneity of DNA Distribution in Diploid Cells: A New Predicitive Discriminant Factor for Solid Tumour Behaviour
title_fullStr Heterogeneity of DNA Distribution in Diploid Cells: A New Predicitive Discriminant Factor for Solid Tumour Behaviour
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity of DNA Distribution in Diploid Cells: A New Predicitive Discriminant Factor for Solid Tumour Behaviour
title_short Heterogeneity of DNA Distribution in Diploid Cells: A New Predicitive Discriminant Factor for Solid Tumour Behaviour
title_sort heterogeneity of dna distribution in diploid cells: a new predicitive discriminant factor for solid tumour behaviour
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10468407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/182468
work_keys_str_mv AT assaillyjacques heterogeneityofdnadistributionindiploidcellsanewpredicitivediscriminantfactorforsolidtumourbehaviour
AT desgrippesarnaud heterogeneityofdnadistributionindiploidcellsanewpredicitivediscriminantfactorforsolidtumourbehaviour
AT loridonrosabrigitte heterogeneityofdnadistributionindiploidcellsanewpredicitivediscriminantfactorforsolidtumourbehaviour
AT pirondominique heterogeneityofdnadistributionindiploidcellsanewpredicitivediscriminantfactorforsolidtumourbehaviour
AT dachezroger heterogeneityofdnadistributionindiploidcellsanewpredicitivediscriminantfactorforsolidtumourbehaviour
AT beurtondaniel heterogeneityofdnadistributionindiploidcellsanewpredicitivediscriminantfactorforsolidtumourbehaviour