Cargando…

Detection of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinomas: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) combined with Automated Spot Counting

In this study the detection of HER2 gene amplification was evaluated using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH; PathVysion) in comparison with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), a PCR based technique. These two methods were evaluated on a series of 46 formalin fixed paraff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moerland, Elna, van Hezik, Rens L. H. P. M., van der Aa, Toine C. J. M., van Beek, Mike W. P. M., van den Brule, Adriaan J. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16988470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2006/741586
_version_ 1782396465214128128
author Moerland, Elna
van Hezik, Rens L. H. P. M.
van der Aa, Toine C. J. M.
van Beek, Mike W. P. M.
van den Brule, Adriaan J. C.
author_facet Moerland, Elna
van Hezik, Rens L. H. P. M.
van der Aa, Toine C. J. M.
van Beek, Mike W. P. M.
van den Brule, Adriaan J. C.
author_sort Moerland, Elna
collection PubMed
description In this study the detection of HER2 gene amplification was evaluated using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH; PathVysion) in comparison with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), a PCR based technique. These two methods were evaluated on a series of 46 formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast carcinomas, previously tested for protein overexpression by HercepTest (grouped into Hercep 1+, 2+ and 3+). HER2 gene amplification (ratio ≥ 2.0) by FISH was found in 9/10, 10/30 and 0/6 in IHC 3+, 2+ and 1+/0 cases, respectively. Digitalized automated spot counting performed with recently developed CW4000 CytoFISH software was 100% concordant with manual FISH scoring. Using MLPA 18/46 samples showed a clear HER2 amplification. Comparing MLPA and IHC showed the same results as for FISH and IHC. All but one FISH positive cases (18/19) were confirmed by MLPA for the presence of the gene amplification. The overall concordance of detection of Her2 gene amplification by FISH and MLPA was 98% (45/46). Furthermore, both the level of amplification and equivocal results correlated well between both methods. In conclusion, MLPA is a reliable and reproducible technique and can be used as an either alternative or additional test to determine HER2 status in breast carcinomas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4615166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46151662016-01-12 Detection of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinomas: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) combined with Automated Spot Counting Moerland, Elna van Hezik, Rens L. H. P. M. van der Aa, Toine C. J. M. van Beek, Mike W. P. M. van den Brule, Adriaan J. C. Cell Oncol Other In this study the detection of HER2 gene amplification was evaluated using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH; PathVysion) in comparison with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), a PCR based technique. These two methods were evaluated on a series of 46 formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast carcinomas, previously tested for protein overexpression by HercepTest (grouped into Hercep 1+, 2+ and 3+). HER2 gene amplification (ratio ≥ 2.0) by FISH was found in 9/10, 10/30 and 0/6 in IHC 3+, 2+ and 1+/0 cases, respectively. Digitalized automated spot counting performed with recently developed CW4000 CytoFISH software was 100% concordant with manual FISH scoring. Using MLPA 18/46 samples showed a clear HER2 amplification. Comparing MLPA and IHC showed the same results as for FISH and IHC. All but one FISH positive cases (18/19) were confirmed by MLPA for the presence of the gene amplification. The overall concordance of detection of Her2 gene amplification by FISH and MLPA was 98% (45/46). Furthermore, both the level of amplification and equivocal results correlated well between both methods. In conclusion, MLPA is a reliable and reproducible technique and can be used as an either alternative or additional test to determine HER2 status in breast carcinomas. IOS Press 2006 2006-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4615166/ /pubmed/16988470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2006/741586 Text en Copyright © 2006 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors.
spellingShingle Other
Moerland, Elna
van Hezik, Rens L. H. P. M.
van der Aa, Toine C. J. M.
van Beek, Mike W. P. M.
van den Brule, Adriaan J. C.
Detection of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinomas: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) combined with Automated Spot Counting
title Detection of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinomas: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) combined with Automated Spot Counting
title_full Detection of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinomas: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) combined with Automated Spot Counting
title_fullStr Detection of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinomas: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) combined with Automated Spot Counting
title_full_unstemmed Detection of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinomas: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) combined with Automated Spot Counting
title_short Detection of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinomas: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) combined with Automated Spot Counting
title_sort detection of her2 amplification in breast carcinomas: comparison of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (mlpa) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (fish) combined with automated spot counting
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16988470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2006/741586
work_keys_str_mv AT moerlandelna detectionofher2amplificationinbreastcarcinomascomparisonofmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpaandfluorescenceinsituhybridizationfishcombinedwithautomatedspotcounting
AT vanhezikrenslhpm detectionofher2amplificationinbreastcarcinomascomparisonofmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpaandfluorescenceinsituhybridizationfishcombinedwithautomatedspotcounting
AT vanderaatoinecjm detectionofher2amplificationinbreastcarcinomascomparisonofmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpaandfluorescenceinsituhybridizationfishcombinedwithautomatedspotcounting
AT vanbeekmikewpm detectionofher2amplificationinbreastcarcinomascomparisonofmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpaandfluorescenceinsituhybridizationfishcombinedwithautomatedspotcounting
AT vandenbruleadriaanjc detectionofher2amplificationinbreastcarcinomascomparisonofmultiplexligationdependentprobeamplificationmlpaandfluorescenceinsituhybridizationfishcombinedwithautomatedspotcounting