Cargando…

Immunocytochemistry and DNA-Image Cytometry in Diagnostic Effusion Cytology I. Prevalence of Markers in Tumour Cell Positive and Negative Smears

To determine the prevalence of immunocytochemical positivities for a panel of antibodies in benign and malignant cells in effusions with known follow‐up in order to use these as diagnostic markers. Besides their ability to identify malignant epithelial cells their contribution to the differential di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motherby, Helma, Kube, Mary, Friedrichs, Nikolaus, Nadjari, Bahram, Knops, Kristiane, Donner, Andreas, Baschiera, Betty, Dalquen, Peter, Böcking, Alfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10661621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/459158
_version_ 1782396467539869696
author Motherby, Helma
Kube, Mary
Friedrichs, Nikolaus
Nadjari, Bahram
Knops, Kristiane
Donner, Andreas
Baschiera, Betty
Dalquen, Peter
Böcking, Alfred
author_facet Motherby, Helma
Kube, Mary
Friedrichs, Nikolaus
Nadjari, Bahram
Knops, Kristiane
Donner, Andreas
Baschiera, Betty
Dalquen, Peter
Böcking, Alfred
author_sort Motherby, Helma
collection PubMed
description To determine the prevalence of immunocytochemical positivities for a panel of antibodies in benign and malignant cells in effusions with known follow‐up in order to use these as diagnostic markers. Besides their ability to identify malignant epithelial cells their contribution to the differential diagnosis between carcinomatoses and mesotheliomas was investigated. 101 tumour cell positive and 53 negative effusions were stained with 12 different antibodies. Results were scored semiquantitatively per cell type. Furthermore, DNA‐image cytometry was performed. While prevalence of Ber‐EP4 positivity was 95.4% in metastatic carcinoma cells, it was 0% in those from mesotheliomas. No cell type reacted with this marker in benign effusions (0%). Ber‐EP4 correctly differentiated between metastatic carcinoma and mesothelioma in 98.0%. Prevalence of DNA‐aneuploidy was 95.4% in metastatic carcinomas, 57.1% in mesotheliomas and 0% in reactive effusions. Combining immunocytochemistry (Ber‐EP4 positivity) and DNA‐image cytometry (aneuploidy) results in a 100% detection of metastatic carcinomatoses and 57.1% of mesotheliomas. Both markers furthermore allowed a correct differentiation of these entities in 98%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4615180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46151802016-01-12 Immunocytochemistry and DNA-Image Cytometry in Diagnostic Effusion Cytology I. Prevalence of Markers in Tumour Cell Positive and Negative Smears Motherby, Helma Kube, Mary Friedrichs, Nikolaus Nadjari, Bahram Knops, Kristiane Donner, Andreas Baschiera, Betty Dalquen, Peter Böcking, Alfred Anal Cell Pathol Other To determine the prevalence of immunocytochemical positivities for a panel of antibodies in benign and malignant cells in effusions with known follow‐up in order to use these as diagnostic markers. Besides their ability to identify malignant epithelial cells their contribution to the differential diagnosis between carcinomatoses and mesotheliomas was investigated. 101 tumour cell positive and 53 negative effusions were stained with 12 different antibodies. Results were scored semiquantitatively per cell type. Furthermore, DNA‐image cytometry was performed. While prevalence of Ber‐EP4 positivity was 95.4% in metastatic carcinoma cells, it was 0% in those from mesotheliomas. No cell type reacted with this marker in benign effusions (0%). Ber‐EP4 correctly differentiated between metastatic carcinoma and mesothelioma in 98.0%. Prevalence of DNA‐aneuploidy was 95.4% in metastatic carcinomas, 57.1% in mesotheliomas and 0% in reactive effusions. Combining immunocytochemistry (Ber‐EP4 positivity) and DNA‐image cytometry (aneuploidy) results in a 100% detection of metastatic carcinomatoses and 57.1% of mesotheliomas. Both markers furthermore allowed a correct differentiation of these entities in 98%. IOS Press 1999 1999-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4615180/ /pubmed/10661621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/459158 Text en Copyright © 1999 Hindawi Publishing Corporation.
spellingShingle Other
Motherby, Helma
Kube, Mary
Friedrichs, Nikolaus
Nadjari, Bahram
Knops, Kristiane
Donner, Andreas
Baschiera, Betty
Dalquen, Peter
Böcking, Alfred
Immunocytochemistry and DNA-Image Cytometry in Diagnostic Effusion Cytology I. Prevalence of Markers in Tumour Cell Positive and Negative Smears
title Immunocytochemistry and DNA-Image Cytometry in Diagnostic Effusion Cytology I. Prevalence of Markers in Tumour Cell Positive and Negative Smears
title_full Immunocytochemistry and DNA-Image Cytometry in Diagnostic Effusion Cytology I. Prevalence of Markers in Tumour Cell Positive and Negative Smears
title_fullStr Immunocytochemistry and DNA-Image Cytometry in Diagnostic Effusion Cytology I. Prevalence of Markers in Tumour Cell Positive and Negative Smears
title_full_unstemmed Immunocytochemistry and DNA-Image Cytometry in Diagnostic Effusion Cytology I. Prevalence of Markers in Tumour Cell Positive and Negative Smears
title_short Immunocytochemistry and DNA-Image Cytometry in Diagnostic Effusion Cytology I. Prevalence of Markers in Tumour Cell Positive and Negative Smears
title_sort immunocytochemistry and dna-image cytometry in diagnostic effusion cytology i. prevalence of markers in tumour cell positive and negative smears
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10661621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/459158
work_keys_str_mv AT motherbyhelma immunocytochemistryanddnaimagecytometryindiagnosticeffusioncytologyiprevalenceofmarkersintumourcellpositiveandnegativesmears
AT kubemary immunocytochemistryanddnaimagecytometryindiagnosticeffusioncytologyiprevalenceofmarkersintumourcellpositiveandnegativesmears
AT friedrichsnikolaus immunocytochemistryanddnaimagecytometryindiagnosticeffusioncytologyiprevalenceofmarkersintumourcellpositiveandnegativesmears
AT nadjaribahram immunocytochemistryanddnaimagecytometryindiagnosticeffusioncytologyiprevalenceofmarkersintumourcellpositiveandnegativesmears
AT knopskristiane immunocytochemistryanddnaimagecytometryindiagnosticeffusioncytologyiprevalenceofmarkersintumourcellpositiveandnegativesmears
AT donnerandreas immunocytochemistryanddnaimagecytometryindiagnosticeffusioncytologyiprevalenceofmarkersintumourcellpositiveandnegativesmears
AT baschierabetty immunocytochemistryanddnaimagecytometryindiagnosticeffusioncytologyiprevalenceofmarkersintumourcellpositiveandnegativesmears
AT dalquenpeter immunocytochemistryanddnaimagecytometryindiagnosticeffusioncytologyiprevalenceofmarkersintumourcellpositiveandnegativesmears
AT bockingalfred immunocytochemistryanddnaimagecytometryindiagnosticeffusioncytologyiprevalenceofmarkersintumourcellpositiveandnegativesmears