Cargando…
Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements
The aim of the present study is to propose alternative automatic methods to time consuming interactive sorting of elements for DNA ploidy measurements. One archival brain tumour and two archival breast carcinoma were studied, corresponding to 7120 elements (3764 nuclei, 3356 debris and aggregates)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
1999
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10609564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/757849 |
_version_ | 1782396468011728896 |
---|---|
author | Boudry, Christophe Herlin, Paulette Plancoulaine, Benoit Masson, Eric Elmoataz, Abderrahim Cardot, Hubert Coster, Michel Bloyet, Daniel Chermant, Jean‐Louis |
author_facet | Boudry, Christophe Herlin, Paulette Plancoulaine, Benoit Masson, Eric Elmoataz, Abderrahim Cardot, Hubert Coster, Michel Bloyet, Daniel Chermant, Jean‐Louis |
author_sort | Boudry, Christophe |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study is to propose alternative automatic methods to time consuming interactive sorting of elements for DNA ploidy measurements. One archival brain tumour and two archival breast carcinoma were studied, corresponding to 7120 elements (3764 nuclei, 3356 debris and aggregates). Three automatic classification methods were tested to eliminate debris and aggregates from DNA ploidy measurements (mathematical morphology (MM), multiparametric analysis (MA) and neural network (NN)). Performances were evaluated by reference to interactive sorting. The results obtained for the three methods concerning the percentage of debris and aggregates automatically removed reach 63, 75 and 85% for MM, MA and NN methods, respectively, with false positive rates of 6, 21 and 25%. Information about DNA ploidy abnormalities were globally preserved after automatic elimination of debris and aggregates by MM and MA methods as opposed to NN method, showing that automatic classification methods can offer alternatives to tedious interactive elimination of debris and aggregates, for DNA ploidy measurements of archival tumours. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4615184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1999 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46151842016-01-12 Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements Boudry, Christophe Herlin, Paulette Plancoulaine, Benoit Masson, Eric Elmoataz, Abderrahim Cardot, Hubert Coster, Michel Bloyet, Daniel Chermant, Jean‐Louis Anal Cell Pathol Other The aim of the present study is to propose alternative automatic methods to time consuming interactive sorting of elements for DNA ploidy measurements. One archival brain tumour and two archival breast carcinoma were studied, corresponding to 7120 elements (3764 nuclei, 3356 debris and aggregates). Three automatic classification methods were tested to eliminate debris and aggregates from DNA ploidy measurements (mathematical morphology (MM), multiparametric analysis (MA) and neural network (NN)). Performances were evaluated by reference to interactive sorting. The results obtained for the three methods concerning the percentage of debris and aggregates automatically removed reach 63, 75 and 85% for MM, MA and NN methods, respectively, with false positive rates of 6, 21 and 25%. Information about DNA ploidy abnormalities were globally preserved after automatic elimination of debris and aggregates by MM and MA methods as opposed to NN method, showing that automatic classification methods can offer alternatives to tedious interactive elimination of debris and aggregates, for DNA ploidy measurements of archival tumours. IOS Press 1999 1999-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4615184/ /pubmed/10609564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/757849 Text en Copyright © 1999 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. |
spellingShingle | Other Boudry, Christophe Herlin, Paulette Plancoulaine, Benoit Masson, Eric Elmoataz, Abderrahim Cardot, Hubert Coster, Michel Bloyet, Daniel Chermant, Jean‐Louis Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements |
title | Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements |
title_full | Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements |
title_fullStr | Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements |
title_short | Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements |
title_sort | automatic morphological sieving: comparison between different methods, application to dna ploidy measurements |
topic | Other |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10609564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/757849 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boudrychristophe automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements AT herlinpaulette automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements AT plancoulainebenoit automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements AT massoneric automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements AT elmoatazabderrahim automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements AT cardothubert automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements AT costermichel automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements AT bloyetdaniel automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements AT chermantjeanlouis automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements |