Cargando…

Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements

The aim of the present study is to propose alternative automatic methods to time consuming interactive sorting of elements for DNA ploidy measurements. One archival brain tumour and two archival breast carcinoma were studied, corresponding to 7120 elements (3764 nuclei, 3356 debris and aggregates)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boudry, Christophe, Herlin, Paulette, Plancoulaine, Benoit, Masson, Eric, Elmoataz, Abderrahim, Cardot, Hubert, Coster, Michel, Bloyet, Daniel, Chermant, Jean‐Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10609564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/757849
_version_ 1782396468011728896
author Boudry, Christophe
Herlin, Paulette
Plancoulaine, Benoit
Masson, Eric
Elmoataz, Abderrahim
Cardot, Hubert
Coster, Michel
Bloyet, Daniel
Chermant, Jean‐Louis
author_facet Boudry, Christophe
Herlin, Paulette
Plancoulaine, Benoit
Masson, Eric
Elmoataz, Abderrahim
Cardot, Hubert
Coster, Michel
Bloyet, Daniel
Chermant, Jean‐Louis
author_sort Boudry, Christophe
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study is to propose alternative automatic methods to time consuming interactive sorting of elements for DNA ploidy measurements. One archival brain tumour and two archival breast carcinoma were studied, corresponding to 7120 elements (3764 nuclei, 3356 debris and aggregates). Three automatic classification methods were tested to eliminate debris and aggregates from DNA ploidy measurements (mathematical morphology (MM), multiparametric analysis (MA) and neural network (NN)). Performances were evaluated by reference to interactive sorting. The results obtained for the three methods concerning the percentage of debris and aggregates automatically removed reach 63, 75 and 85% for MM, MA and NN methods, respectively, with false positive rates of 6, 21 and 25%. Information about DNA ploidy abnormalities were globally preserved after automatic elimination of debris and aggregates by MM and MA methods as opposed to NN method, showing that automatic classification methods can offer alternatives to tedious interactive elimination of debris and aggregates, for DNA ploidy measurements of archival tumours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4615184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46151842016-01-12 Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements Boudry, Christophe Herlin, Paulette Plancoulaine, Benoit Masson, Eric Elmoataz, Abderrahim Cardot, Hubert Coster, Michel Bloyet, Daniel Chermant, Jean‐Louis Anal Cell Pathol Other The aim of the present study is to propose alternative automatic methods to time consuming interactive sorting of elements for DNA ploidy measurements. One archival brain tumour and two archival breast carcinoma were studied, corresponding to 7120 elements (3764 nuclei, 3356 debris and aggregates). Three automatic classification methods were tested to eliminate debris and aggregates from DNA ploidy measurements (mathematical morphology (MM), multiparametric analysis (MA) and neural network (NN)). Performances were evaluated by reference to interactive sorting. The results obtained for the three methods concerning the percentage of debris and aggregates automatically removed reach 63, 75 and 85% for MM, MA and NN methods, respectively, with false positive rates of 6, 21 and 25%. Information about DNA ploidy abnormalities were globally preserved after automatic elimination of debris and aggregates by MM and MA methods as opposed to NN method, showing that automatic classification methods can offer alternatives to tedious interactive elimination of debris and aggregates, for DNA ploidy measurements of archival tumours. IOS Press 1999 1999-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4615184/ /pubmed/10609564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/757849 Text en Copyright © 1999 Hindawi Publishing Corporation.
spellingShingle Other
Boudry, Christophe
Herlin, Paulette
Plancoulaine, Benoit
Masson, Eric
Elmoataz, Abderrahim
Cardot, Hubert
Coster, Michel
Bloyet, Daniel
Chermant, Jean‐Louis
Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements
title Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements
title_full Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements
title_fullStr Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements
title_short Automatic Morphological Sieving: Comparison between Different Methods, Application to DNA Ploidy Measurements
title_sort automatic morphological sieving: comparison between different methods, application to dna ploidy measurements
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10609564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1999/757849
work_keys_str_mv AT boudrychristophe automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements
AT herlinpaulette automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements
AT plancoulainebenoit automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements
AT massoneric automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements
AT elmoatazabderrahim automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements
AT cardothubert automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements
AT costermichel automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements
AT bloyetdaniel automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements
AT chermantjeanlouis automaticmorphologicalsievingcomparisonbetweendifferentmethodsapplicationtodnaploidymeasurements