Cargando…

Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos

Nuclear landscapes were studied during preimplantation development of bovine embryos, generated either by in vitro fertilization (IVF), or generated as cloned embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) of bovine fetal fibroblasts, using 3-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy (3D-CLSM)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Popken, Jens, Brero, Alessandro, Koehler, Daniela, Schmid, Volker J, Strauss, Axel, Wuensch, Annegret, Guengoer, Tuna, Graf, Alexander, Krebs, Stefan, Blum, Helmut, Zakhartchenko, Valeri, Wolf, Eckhard, Cremer, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25482066
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19491034.2014.979712
_version_ 1782396510522048512
author Popken, Jens
Brero, Alessandro
Koehler, Daniela
Schmid, Volker J
Strauss, Axel
Wuensch, Annegret
Guengoer, Tuna
Graf, Alexander
Krebs, Stefan
Blum, Helmut
Zakhartchenko, Valeri
Wolf, Eckhard
Cremer, Thomas
author_facet Popken, Jens
Brero, Alessandro
Koehler, Daniela
Schmid, Volker J
Strauss, Axel
Wuensch, Annegret
Guengoer, Tuna
Graf, Alexander
Krebs, Stefan
Blum, Helmut
Zakhartchenko, Valeri
Wolf, Eckhard
Cremer, Thomas
author_sort Popken, Jens
collection PubMed
description Nuclear landscapes were studied during preimplantation development of bovine embryos, generated either by in vitro fertilization (IVF), or generated as cloned embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) of bovine fetal fibroblasts, using 3-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy (3D-CLSM) and structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM). Nuclear landscapes of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were compared with each other and with fibroblast nuclei. We demonstrate that reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned embryos requires changes of their landscapes similar to nuclei of IVF embryos. On the way toward the 8-cell stage, where major genome activation occurs, a major lacuna, enriched with splicing factors, was formed in the nuclear interior and chromosome territories (CTs) were shifted toward the nuclear periphery. During further development the major lacuna disappeared and CTs were redistributed throughout the nuclear interior forming a contiguous higher order chromatin network. At all stages of development CTs of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were built up from chromatin domain clusters (CDCs) pervaded by interchromatin compartment (IC) channels. Quantitative analyses revealed a highly significant enrichment of RNA polymerase II and H3K4me3, a marker for transcriptionally competent chromatin, at the periphery of CDCs. In contrast, H3K9me3, a marker for silent chromatin, was enriched in the more compacted interior of CDCs. Despite these striking similarities, we also detected major differences between nuclear landscapes of IVF and cloned embryos. Possible implications of these differences for the developmental potential of cloned animals remain to be investigated. We present a model, which integrates generally applicable structural and functional features of the nuclear landscape.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4615760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46157602015-11-06 Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos Popken, Jens Brero, Alessandro Koehler, Daniela Schmid, Volker J Strauss, Axel Wuensch, Annegret Guengoer, Tuna Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Blum, Helmut Zakhartchenko, Valeri Wolf, Eckhard Cremer, Thomas Nucleus Research Paper Nuclear landscapes were studied during preimplantation development of bovine embryos, generated either by in vitro fertilization (IVF), or generated as cloned embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) of bovine fetal fibroblasts, using 3-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy (3D-CLSM) and structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM). Nuclear landscapes of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were compared with each other and with fibroblast nuclei. We demonstrate that reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned embryos requires changes of their landscapes similar to nuclei of IVF embryos. On the way toward the 8-cell stage, where major genome activation occurs, a major lacuna, enriched with splicing factors, was formed in the nuclear interior and chromosome territories (CTs) were shifted toward the nuclear periphery. During further development the major lacuna disappeared and CTs were redistributed throughout the nuclear interior forming a contiguous higher order chromatin network. At all stages of development CTs of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were built up from chromatin domain clusters (CDCs) pervaded by interchromatin compartment (IC) channels. Quantitative analyses revealed a highly significant enrichment of RNA polymerase II and H3K4me3, a marker for transcriptionally competent chromatin, at the periphery of CDCs. In contrast, H3K9me3, a marker for silent chromatin, was enriched in the more compacted interior of CDCs. Despite these striking similarities, we also detected major differences between nuclear landscapes of IVF and cloned embryos. Possible implications of these differences for the developmental potential of cloned animals remain to be investigated. We present a model, which integrates generally applicable structural and functional features of the nuclear landscape. Taylor & Francis 2014-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4615760/ /pubmed/25482066 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19491034.2014.979712 Text en © 2014 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Popken, Jens
Brero, Alessandro
Koehler, Daniela
Schmid, Volker J
Strauss, Axel
Wuensch, Annegret
Guengoer, Tuna
Graf, Alexander
Krebs, Stefan
Blum, Helmut
Zakhartchenko, Valeri
Wolf, Eckhard
Cremer, Thomas
Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos
title Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos
title_full Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos
title_fullStr Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos
title_full_unstemmed Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos
title_short Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos
title_sort reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25482066
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19491034.2014.979712
work_keys_str_mv AT popkenjens reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT breroalessandro reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT koehlerdaniela reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT schmidvolkerj reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT straussaxel reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT wuenschannegret reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT guengoertuna reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT grafalexander reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT krebsstefan reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT blumhelmut reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT zakhartchenkovaleri reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT wolfeckhard reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos
AT cremerthomas reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos