Cargando…
Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos
Nuclear landscapes were studied during preimplantation development of bovine embryos, generated either by in vitro fertilization (IVF), or generated as cloned embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) of bovine fetal fibroblasts, using 3-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy (3D-CLSM)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25482066 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19491034.2014.979712 |
_version_ | 1782396510522048512 |
---|---|
author | Popken, Jens Brero, Alessandro Koehler, Daniela Schmid, Volker J Strauss, Axel Wuensch, Annegret Guengoer, Tuna Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Blum, Helmut Zakhartchenko, Valeri Wolf, Eckhard Cremer, Thomas |
author_facet | Popken, Jens Brero, Alessandro Koehler, Daniela Schmid, Volker J Strauss, Axel Wuensch, Annegret Guengoer, Tuna Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Blum, Helmut Zakhartchenko, Valeri Wolf, Eckhard Cremer, Thomas |
author_sort | Popken, Jens |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nuclear landscapes were studied during preimplantation development of bovine embryos, generated either by in vitro fertilization (IVF), or generated as cloned embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) of bovine fetal fibroblasts, using 3-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy (3D-CLSM) and structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM). Nuclear landscapes of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were compared with each other and with fibroblast nuclei. We demonstrate that reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned embryos requires changes of their landscapes similar to nuclei of IVF embryos. On the way toward the 8-cell stage, where major genome activation occurs, a major lacuna, enriched with splicing factors, was formed in the nuclear interior and chromosome territories (CTs) were shifted toward the nuclear periphery. During further development the major lacuna disappeared and CTs were redistributed throughout the nuclear interior forming a contiguous higher order chromatin network. At all stages of development CTs of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were built up from chromatin domain clusters (CDCs) pervaded by interchromatin compartment (IC) channels. Quantitative analyses revealed a highly significant enrichment of RNA polymerase II and H3K4me3, a marker for transcriptionally competent chromatin, at the periphery of CDCs. In contrast, H3K9me3, a marker for silent chromatin, was enriched in the more compacted interior of CDCs. Despite these striking similarities, we also detected major differences between nuclear landscapes of IVF and cloned embryos. Possible implications of these differences for the developmental potential of cloned animals remain to be investigated. We present a model, which integrates generally applicable structural and functional features of the nuclear landscape. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4615760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46157602015-11-06 Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos Popken, Jens Brero, Alessandro Koehler, Daniela Schmid, Volker J Strauss, Axel Wuensch, Annegret Guengoer, Tuna Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Blum, Helmut Zakhartchenko, Valeri Wolf, Eckhard Cremer, Thomas Nucleus Research Paper Nuclear landscapes were studied during preimplantation development of bovine embryos, generated either by in vitro fertilization (IVF), or generated as cloned embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) of bovine fetal fibroblasts, using 3-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy (3D-CLSM) and structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM). Nuclear landscapes of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were compared with each other and with fibroblast nuclei. We demonstrate that reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned embryos requires changes of their landscapes similar to nuclei of IVF embryos. On the way toward the 8-cell stage, where major genome activation occurs, a major lacuna, enriched with splicing factors, was formed in the nuclear interior and chromosome territories (CTs) were shifted toward the nuclear periphery. During further development the major lacuna disappeared and CTs were redistributed throughout the nuclear interior forming a contiguous higher order chromatin network. At all stages of development CTs of IVF and SCNT embryonic nuclei were built up from chromatin domain clusters (CDCs) pervaded by interchromatin compartment (IC) channels. Quantitative analyses revealed a highly significant enrichment of RNA polymerase II and H3K4me3, a marker for transcriptionally competent chromatin, at the periphery of CDCs. In contrast, H3K9me3, a marker for silent chromatin, was enriched in the more compacted interior of CDCs. Despite these striking similarities, we also detected major differences between nuclear landscapes of IVF and cloned embryos. Possible implications of these differences for the developmental potential of cloned animals remain to be investigated. We present a model, which integrates generally applicable structural and functional features of the nuclear landscape. Taylor & Francis 2014-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4615760/ /pubmed/25482066 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19491034.2014.979712 Text en © 2014 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Popken, Jens Brero, Alessandro Koehler, Daniela Schmid, Volker J Strauss, Axel Wuensch, Annegret Guengoer, Tuna Graf, Alexander Krebs, Stefan Blum, Helmut Zakhartchenko, Valeri Wolf, Eckhard Cremer, Thomas Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos |
title | Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos |
title_full | Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos |
title_fullStr | Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos |
title_full_unstemmed | Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos |
title_short | Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos |
title_sort | reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25482066 http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19491034.2014.979712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT popkenjens reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT breroalessandro reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT koehlerdaniela reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT schmidvolkerj reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT straussaxel reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT wuenschannegret reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT guengoertuna reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT grafalexander reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT krebsstefan reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT blumhelmut reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT zakhartchenkovaleri reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT wolfeckhard reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos AT cremerthomas reprogrammingoffibroblastnucleiinclonedbovineembryosinvolvesmajorstructuralremodelingwithbothstrikingsimilaritiesanddifferencestonuclearphenotypesofinvitrofertilizedembryos |