Cargando…

Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery

Purpose. To validate clinically a new method for estimating the corneal power (P (c)) using a variable keratometric index (n (kadj)) in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery. Setting. University of Alicante and Medimar International Hospital (Oftalmar), Alicante, (Spain). Design. Retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camps, Vicente J., Piñero, David P., Mateo, Veronica, García, Celia, Artola, Alberto, Pérez-Cambrodi, Rafael, Ruiz-Fortes, Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/824293
_version_ 1782396519737982976
author Camps, Vicente J.
Piñero, David P.
Mateo, Veronica
García, Celia
Artola, Alberto
Pérez-Cambrodi, Rafael
Ruiz-Fortes, Pedro
author_facet Camps, Vicente J.
Piñero, David P.
Mateo, Veronica
García, Celia
Artola, Alberto
Pérez-Cambrodi, Rafael
Ruiz-Fortes, Pedro
author_sort Camps, Vicente J.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To validate clinically a new method for estimating the corneal power (P (c)) using a variable keratometric index (n (kadj)) in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery. Setting. University of Alicante and Medimar International Hospital (Oftalmar), Alicante, (Spain). Design. Retrospective case series. Methods. This retrospective study comprised 62 eyes of 62 patients that had undergone myopic LASIK surgery. An algorithm for the calculation of n (kadj) was used for the estimation of the adjusted keratometric corneal power (P (kadj)). This value was compared with the classical keratometric corneal power (P (k)), the True Net Power (TNP), and the Gaussian corneal power (P (cGauss)). Likewise, P (kadj) was compared with other previously described methods. Results. Differences between P (cGauss) and P (c) values obtained with all methods evaluated were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Differences between P (kadj) and P (cGauss) were in the limit of clinical significance (p < 0.01, loA [−0.33,0.60] D). Differences between P (kadj) and TNP were not statistically and clinically significant (p = 0.319, loA [−0.50,0.44] D). Differences between P (kadj) and previously described methods were statistically significant (p < 0.01), except with P (cHaigisL) (p = 0.09, loA [−0.37,0.29] D). Conclusion. The use of the adjusted keratometric index (n (kadj)) is a valid method to estimate the central corneal power in corneas with previous myopic laser refractive surgery, providing results comparable to P (cHaigisL).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4615848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46158482015-11-02 Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery Camps, Vicente J. Piñero, David P. Mateo, Veronica García, Celia Artola, Alberto Pérez-Cambrodi, Rafael Ruiz-Fortes, Pedro J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. To validate clinically a new method for estimating the corneal power (P (c)) using a variable keratometric index (n (kadj)) in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery. Setting. University of Alicante and Medimar International Hospital (Oftalmar), Alicante, (Spain). Design. Retrospective case series. Methods. This retrospective study comprised 62 eyes of 62 patients that had undergone myopic LASIK surgery. An algorithm for the calculation of n (kadj) was used for the estimation of the adjusted keratometric corneal power (P (kadj)). This value was compared with the classical keratometric corneal power (P (k)), the True Net Power (TNP), and the Gaussian corneal power (P (cGauss)). Likewise, P (kadj) was compared with other previously described methods. Results. Differences between P (cGauss) and P (c) values obtained with all methods evaluated were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Differences between P (kadj) and P (cGauss) were in the limit of clinical significance (p < 0.01, loA [−0.33,0.60] D). Differences between P (kadj) and TNP were not statistically and clinically significant (p = 0.319, loA [−0.50,0.44] D). Differences between P (kadj) and previously described methods were statistically significant (p < 0.01), except with P (cHaigisL) (p = 0.09, loA [−0.37,0.29] D). Conclusion. The use of the adjusted keratometric index (n (kadj)) is a valid method to estimate the central corneal power in corneas with previous myopic laser refractive surgery, providing results comparable to P (cHaigisL). Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4615848/ /pubmed/26528400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/824293 Text en Copyright © 2015 Vicente J. Camps et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Camps, Vicente J.
Piñero, David P.
Mateo, Veronica
García, Celia
Artola, Alberto
Pérez-Cambrodi, Rafael
Ruiz-Fortes, Pedro
Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery
title Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery
title_full Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery
title_fullStr Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery
title_short Clinical Validation of Adjusted Corneal Power in Patients with Previous Myopic Lasik Surgery
title_sort clinical validation of adjusted corneal power in patients with previous myopic lasik surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/824293
work_keys_str_mv AT campsvicentej clinicalvalidationofadjustedcornealpowerinpatientswithpreviousmyopiclasiksurgery
AT pinerodavidp clinicalvalidationofadjustedcornealpowerinpatientswithpreviousmyopiclasiksurgery
AT mateoveronica clinicalvalidationofadjustedcornealpowerinpatientswithpreviousmyopiclasiksurgery
AT garciacelia clinicalvalidationofadjustedcornealpowerinpatientswithpreviousmyopiclasiksurgery
AT artolaalberto clinicalvalidationofadjustedcornealpowerinpatientswithpreviousmyopiclasiksurgery
AT perezcambrodirafael clinicalvalidationofadjustedcornealpowerinpatientswithpreviousmyopiclasiksurgery
AT ruizfortespedro clinicalvalidationofadjustedcornealpowerinpatientswithpreviousmyopiclasiksurgery