Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Photographic Scale for Assessment of Lip Fullness

BACKGROUND: As lip augmentation becomes more popular, validated measures of lip fullness for quantification of outcomes are needed. OBJECTIVE: Develop a scale for rating lip fullness and establish its reliability and sensitivity for assessing clinically meaningful differences. METHODS: The initial A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werschler, W. Philip, Fagien, Steven, Thomas, Jane, Paradkar-Mitragotri, Deepali, Rotunda, Adam, Beddingfield, Frederick C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25805282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sju025
_version_ 1782396528896245760
author Werschler, W. Philip
Fagien, Steven
Thomas, Jane
Paradkar-Mitragotri, Deepali
Rotunda, Adam
Beddingfield, Frederick C.
author_facet Werschler, W. Philip
Fagien, Steven
Thomas, Jane
Paradkar-Mitragotri, Deepali
Rotunda, Adam
Beddingfield, Frederick C.
author_sort Werschler, W. Philip
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As lip augmentation becomes more popular, validated measures of lip fullness for quantification of outcomes are needed. OBJECTIVE: Develop a scale for rating lip fullness and establish its reliability and sensitivity for assessing clinically meaningful differences. METHODS: The initial Allergan Lip Fullness Scale (iLFS; a four-point photographic scale with verbal descriptions) was validated by eight physicians rating 55 live subjects during two rounds, conducted on one day. In addition, subjects performed self-evaluations. The revised Allergan Lip Fullness Scale (LFS), a five-point scale with a broader range of lip presentations, was validated by 21 clinicians in two online image rating sessions, ≥14 days apart, in which they used the LFS to rate overall, upper, and lower lip fullness of 144 3-dimensional (3D) images. Physician inter- and intra-rater agreement, subject intra-rater agreement (iLFS), and subject-physician agreement (iLFS) were evaluated. Additionally, during online rating session 1, raters ranked 38 pairs of 3D images, taken before and after lip augmentation, as “clinically different” or “not clinically different.” The median LFS score difference for clinically different pairs was calculated to determine the clinically meaningful difference. RESULTS: Clinician inter- and intra-rater agreement for the iLFS and LFS was substantial to almost perfect. Subject self-assessments (iLFS) had substantial intra-rater reliability and a high level of agreement with physician assessments. Median LFS score differences for overall, upper, and lower lip fullness were 1 (mean: 0.63-0.69) for “clinically different” and 0 (mean: 0.28-0.36) for “not clinically different” image pairs; thus, clinical significance of a 1-point difference in LFS score was established. CONCLUSIONS: The LFS is a reliable instrument for physician classification of lip fullness. A 1-point score difference can detect clinically meaningful differences in lip fullness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4615891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46158912015-10-26 Development and Validation of a Photographic Scale for Assessment of Lip Fullness Werschler, W. Philip Fagien, Steven Thomas, Jane Paradkar-Mitragotri, Deepali Rotunda, Adam Beddingfield, Frederick C. Aesthet Surg J Cosmetic Medicine BACKGROUND: As lip augmentation becomes more popular, validated measures of lip fullness for quantification of outcomes are needed. OBJECTIVE: Develop a scale for rating lip fullness and establish its reliability and sensitivity for assessing clinically meaningful differences. METHODS: The initial Allergan Lip Fullness Scale (iLFS; a four-point photographic scale with verbal descriptions) was validated by eight physicians rating 55 live subjects during two rounds, conducted on one day. In addition, subjects performed self-evaluations. The revised Allergan Lip Fullness Scale (LFS), a five-point scale with a broader range of lip presentations, was validated by 21 clinicians in two online image rating sessions, ≥14 days apart, in which they used the LFS to rate overall, upper, and lower lip fullness of 144 3-dimensional (3D) images. Physician inter- and intra-rater agreement, subject intra-rater agreement (iLFS), and subject-physician agreement (iLFS) were evaluated. Additionally, during online rating session 1, raters ranked 38 pairs of 3D images, taken before and after lip augmentation, as “clinically different” or “not clinically different.” The median LFS score difference for clinically different pairs was calculated to determine the clinically meaningful difference. RESULTS: Clinician inter- and intra-rater agreement for the iLFS and LFS was substantial to almost perfect. Subject self-assessments (iLFS) had substantial intra-rater reliability and a high level of agreement with physician assessments. Median LFS score differences for overall, upper, and lower lip fullness were 1 (mean: 0.63-0.69) for “clinically different” and 0 (mean: 0.28-0.36) for “not clinically different” image pairs; thus, clinical significance of a 1-point difference in LFS score was established. CONCLUSIONS: The LFS is a reliable instrument for physician classification of lip fullness. A 1-point score difference can detect clinically meaningful differences in lip fullness. Oxford University Press 2015-03 2015-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4615891/ /pubmed/25805282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sju025 Text en © 2015 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Cosmetic Medicine
Werschler, W. Philip
Fagien, Steven
Thomas, Jane
Paradkar-Mitragotri, Deepali
Rotunda, Adam
Beddingfield, Frederick C.
Development and Validation of a Photographic Scale for Assessment of Lip Fullness
title Development and Validation of a Photographic Scale for Assessment of Lip Fullness
title_full Development and Validation of a Photographic Scale for Assessment of Lip Fullness
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Photographic Scale for Assessment of Lip Fullness
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Photographic Scale for Assessment of Lip Fullness
title_short Development and Validation of a Photographic Scale for Assessment of Lip Fullness
title_sort development and validation of a photographic scale for assessment of lip fullness
topic Cosmetic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25805282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sju025
work_keys_str_mv AT werschlerwphilip developmentandvalidationofaphotographicscaleforassessmentoflipfullness
AT fagiensteven developmentandvalidationofaphotographicscaleforassessmentoflipfullness
AT thomasjane developmentandvalidationofaphotographicscaleforassessmentoflipfullness
AT paradkarmitragotrideepali developmentandvalidationofaphotographicscaleforassessmentoflipfullness
AT rotundaadam developmentandvalidationofaphotographicscaleforassessmentoflipfullness
AT beddingfieldfrederickc developmentandvalidationofaphotographicscaleforassessmentoflipfullness