Cargando…

Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes

No previous analysis has investigated the determinants of screening uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening for possible spillover effects from one type of screening examination to the other type of screening examination with a dynamic bivariate panel probit model. For our analysis, we used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labeit, Alexander, Peinemann, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26487452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0065-3
_version_ 1782396531695943680
author Labeit, Alexander
Peinemann, Frank
author_facet Labeit, Alexander
Peinemann, Frank
author_sort Labeit, Alexander
collection PubMed
description No previous analysis has investigated the determinants of screening uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening for possible spillover effects from one type of screening examination to the other type of screening examination with a dynamic bivariate panel probit model. For our analysis, we used a dynamic random effects bivariate panel probit model with initial conditions (Wooldridge-type estimator) and dependent variables were the participation of breast and cervical cancer screening in the recent year. The balanced panel sample consisted of 844 women from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) from the time period 1992 to 2008. Our analysis showed the high relevance of past screening behaviour and the importance of state dependency for the same and the other type of cancer screening examinations even after controlling for covariates and unobserved heterogeneity. The uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening was higher when the same screening examination was done one or three years earlier. This result is in accordance with the medical screening programmes in Great Britain. With regard to breast and cervical cancer screening positive spillover effects existed between screening examinations in the third order lags. Women with a previous visit to a general practitioner and individuals in the recommended age groups had a higher uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening. Other socioeconomic and health related variables had non-uniform results in both screening examinations. Promoting the uptake of one female prevention activity could also enhance the uptake of the other prevention activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4615931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46159312015-10-29 Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes Labeit, Alexander Peinemann, Frank Health Econ Rev Research No previous analysis has investigated the determinants of screening uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening for possible spillover effects from one type of screening examination to the other type of screening examination with a dynamic bivariate panel probit model. For our analysis, we used a dynamic random effects bivariate panel probit model with initial conditions (Wooldridge-type estimator) and dependent variables were the participation of breast and cervical cancer screening in the recent year. The balanced panel sample consisted of 844 women from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) from the time period 1992 to 2008. Our analysis showed the high relevance of past screening behaviour and the importance of state dependency for the same and the other type of cancer screening examinations even after controlling for covariates and unobserved heterogeneity. The uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening was higher when the same screening examination was done one or three years earlier. This result is in accordance with the medical screening programmes in Great Britain. With regard to breast and cervical cancer screening positive spillover effects existed between screening examinations in the third order lags. Women with a previous visit to a general practitioner and individuals in the recommended age groups had a higher uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening. Other socioeconomic and health related variables had non-uniform results in both screening examinations. Promoting the uptake of one female prevention activity could also enhance the uptake of the other prevention activity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4615931/ /pubmed/26487452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0065-3 Text en © Labeit and Peinemann. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Labeit, Alexander
Peinemann, Frank
Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes
title Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes
title_full Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes
title_fullStr Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes
title_full_unstemmed Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes
title_short Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes
title_sort breast and cervical cancer screening in great britain: dynamic interrelated processes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26487452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0065-3
work_keys_str_mv AT labeitalexander breastandcervicalcancerscreeningingreatbritaindynamicinterrelatedprocesses
AT peinemannfrank breastandcervicalcancerscreeningingreatbritaindynamicinterrelatedprocesses