Cargando…
Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes
No previous analysis has investigated the determinants of screening uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening for possible spillover effects from one type of screening examination to the other type of screening examination with a dynamic bivariate panel probit model. For our analysis, we used...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26487452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0065-3 |
_version_ | 1782396531695943680 |
---|---|
author | Labeit, Alexander Peinemann, Frank |
author_facet | Labeit, Alexander Peinemann, Frank |
author_sort | Labeit, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | No previous analysis has investigated the determinants of screening uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening for possible spillover effects from one type of screening examination to the other type of screening examination with a dynamic bivariate panel probit model. For our analysis, we used a dynamic random effects bivariate panel probit model with initial conditions (Wooldridge-type estimator) and dependent variables were the participation of breast and cervical cancer screening in the recent year. The balanced panel sample consisted of 844 women from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) from the time period 1992 to 2008. Our analysis showed the high relevance of past screening behaviour and the importance of state dependency for the same and the other type of cancer screening examinations even after controlling for covariates and unobserved heterogeneity. The uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening was higher when the same screening examination was done one or three years earlier. This result is in accordance with the medical screening programmes in Great Britain. With regard to breast and cervical cancer screening positive spillover effects existed between screening examinations in the third order lags. Women with a previous visit to a general practitioner and individuals in the recommended age groups had a higher uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening. Other socioeconomic and health related variables had non-uniform results in both screening examinations. Promoting the uptake of one female prevention activity could also enhance the uptake of the other prevention activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4615931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46159312015-10-29 Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes Labeit, Alexander Peinemann, Frank Health Econ Rev Research No previous analysis has investigated the determinants of screening uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening for possible spillover effects from one type of screening examination to the other type of screening examination with a dynamic bivariate panel probit model. For our analysis, we used a dynamic random effects bivariate panel probit model with initial conditions (Wooldridge-type estimator) and dependent variables were the participation of breast and cervical cancer screening in the recent year. The balanced panel sample consisted of 844 women from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) from the time period 1992 to 2008. Our analysis showed the high relevance of past screening behaviour and the importance of state dependency for the same and the other type of cancer screening examinations even after controlling for covariates and unobserved heterogeneity. The uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening was higher when the same screening examination was done one or three years earlier. This result is in accordance with the medical screening programmes in Great Britain. With regard to breast and cervical cancer screening positive spillover effects existed between screening examinations in the third order lags. Women with a previous visit to a general practitioner and individuals in the recommended age groups had a higher uptake for breast and cervical cancer screening. Other socioeconomic and health related variables had non-uniform results in both screening examinations. Promoting the uptake of one female prevention activity could also enhance the uptake of the other prevention activity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4615931/ /pubmed/26487452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0065-3 Text en © Labeit and Peinemann. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Labeit, Alexander Peinemann, Frank Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes |
title | Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes |
title_full | Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes |
title_fullStr | Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes |
title_short | Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes |
title_sort | breast and cervical cancer screening in great britain: dynamic interrelated processes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26487452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0065-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT labeitalexander breastandcervicalcancerscreeningingreatbritaindynamicinterrelatedprocesses AT peinemannfrank breastandcervicalcancerscreeningingreatbritaindynamicinterrelatedprocesses |