Cargando…

Implementation of Accurate and Fast DNA Cytometry by Confocal Microscopy in 3D

Background: DNA cytometry is a powerful method for measuring genomic instability. Standard approaches that measure DNA content of isolated cells may induce selection bias and do not allow interpretation of genomic instability in the context of the tissue. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ploeger, Lennert S., Huisman, André, van der Gugten, Jurryt, van der Giezen, Dionne M., Beliën, Jeroen A. M., Abbaker, Abdelhadi Y., Dullens, Hub F. J., Grizzle, William, Poulin, Neal M., Meijer, Gerrit A., van Diest, Paul J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16308471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2005/289216
_version_ 1782396538225426432
author Ploeger, Lennert S.
Huisman, André
van der Gugten, Jurryt
van der Giezen, Dionne M.
Beliën, Jeroen A. M.
Abbaker, Abdelhadi Y.
Dullens, Hub F. J.
Grizzle, William
Poulin, Neal M.
Meijer, Gerrit A.
van Diest, Paul J.
author_facet Ploeger, Lennert S.
Huisman, André
van der Gugten, Jurryt
van der Giezen, Dionne M.
Beliën, Jeroen A. M.
Abbaker, Abdelhadi Y.
Dullens, Hub F. J.
Grizzle, William
Poulin, Neal M.
Meijer, Gerrit A.
van Diest, Paul J.
author_sort Ploeger, Lennert S.
collection PubMed
description Background: DNA cytometry is a powerful method for measuring genomic instability. Standard approaches that measure DNA content of isolated cells may induce selection bias and do not allow interpretation of genomic instability in the context of the tissue. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) provides the opportunity to perform 3D DNA content measurements on intact cells in thick histological sections. Because the technique is technically challenging and time consuming, only a small number of usually manually selected nuclei were analyzed in different studies, not allowing wide clinical evaluation. The aim of this study was to describe the conditions for accurate and fast 3D CLSM cytometry with a minimum of user interaction to arrive at sufficient throughput for pilot clinical applications. Methods: Nuclear DNA was stained in 14 μm thick tissue sections of normal liver and adrenal stained with either YOYO-1 iodide or TO-PRO-3 iodide. Different pre-treatment strategies were evaluated: boiling in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) followed by RNase application for 1 or 18 hours, or hydrolysis. The image stacks obtained with CLSM at microscope magnifications of ×40 or ×100 were analyzed off-line using in-house developed software for semi-automated 3D fluorescence quantitation. To avoid sectioned nuclei, the top and bottom of the stacks were identified from ZX and YZ projections. As a measure of histogram quality, the coefficient of variation (CV) of the diploid peak was assessed. Results: The lowest CV (10.3%) was achieved with a protocol without boiling, with 1 hour RNase treatment and TO-PRO-3 iodide staining, and a final image recording at ×60 or ×100 magnifications. A sample size of 300 nuclei was generally achievable. By filtering the set of automatically segmented nuclei based on volume, size and shape, followed by interactive removal of the few remaining faulty objects, a single measurement was completely analyzed in approximately 3 hours. Conclusions: The described methodology allows to obtain a largely unbiased sample of nuclei in thick tissue sections using 3D DNA cytometry by confocal laser scanning microscopy within an acceptable time frame for pilot clinical applications, and with a CV small enough to resolve smaller near diploid stemlines. This provides a suitable method for 3D DNA ploidy assessment of selected rare cells based on morphologic characteristics and of clinical samples that are too small to prepare adequate cell suspensions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4615959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46159592016-01-12 Implementation of Accurate and Fast DNA Cytometry by Confocal Microscopy in 3D Ploeger, Lennert S. Huisman, André van der Gugten, Jurryt van der Giezen, Dionne M. Beliën, Jeroen A. M. Abbaker, Abdelhadi Y. Dullens, Hub F. J. Grizzle, William Poulin, Neal M. Meijer, Gerrit A. van Diest, Paul J. Cell Oncol Other Background: DNA cytometry is a powerful method for measuring genomic instability. Standard approaches that measure DNA content of isolated cells may induce selection bias and do not allow interpretation of genomic instability in the context of the tissue. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) provides the opportunity to perform 3D DNA content measurements on intact cells in thick histological sections. Because the technique is technically challenging and time consuming, only a small number of usually manually selected nuclei were analyzed in different studies, not allowing wide clinical evaluation. The aim of this study was to describe the conditions for accurate and fast 3D CLSM cytometry with a minimum of user interaction to arrive at sufficient throughput for pilot clinical applications. Methods: Nuclear DNA was stained in 14 μm thick tissue sections of normal liver and adrenal stained with either YOYO-1 iodide or TO-PRO-3 iodide. Different pre-treatment strategies were evaluated: boiling in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) followed by RNase application for 1 or 18 hours, or hydrolysis. The image stacks obtained with CLSM at microscope magnifications of ×40 or ×100 were analyzed off-line using in-house developed software for semi-automated 3D fluorescence quantitation. To avoid sectioned nuclei, the top and bottom of the stacks were identified from ZX and YZ projections. As a measure of histogram quality, the coefficient of variation (CV) of the diploid peak was assessed. Results: The lowest CV (10.3%) was achieved with a protocol without boiling, with 1 hour RNase treatment and TO-PRO-3 iodide staining, and a final image recording at ×60 or ×100 magnifications. A sample size of 300 nuclei was generally achievable. By filtering the set of automatically segmented nuclei based on volume, size and shape, followed by interactive removal of the few remaining faulty objects, a single measurement was completely analyzed in approximately 3 hours. Conclusions: The described methodology allows to obtain a largely unbiased sample of nuclei in thick tissue sections using 3D DNA cytometry by confocal laser scanning microscopy within an acceptable time frame for pilot clinical applications, and with a CV small enough to resolve smaller near diploid stemlines. This provides a suitable method for 3D DNA ploidy assessment of selected rare cells based on morphologic characteristics and of clinical samples that are too small to prepare adequate cell suspensions. IOS Press 2005 2005-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4615959/ /pubmed/16308471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2005/289216 Text en Copyright © 2005 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors.
spellingShingle Other
Ploeger, Lennert S.
Huisman, André
van der Gugten, Jurryt
van der Giezen, Dionne M.
Beliën, Jeroen A. M.
Abbaker, Abdelhadi Y.
Dullens, Hub F. J.
Grizzle, William
Poulin, Neal M.
Meijer, Gerrit A.
van Diest, Paul J.
Implementation of Accurate and Fast DNA Cytometry by Confocal Microscopy in 3D
title Implementation of Accurate and Fast DNA Cytometry by Confocal Microscopy in 3D
title_full Implementation of Accurate and Fast DNA Cytometry by Confocal Microscopy in 3D
title_fullStr Implementation of Accurate and Fast DNA Cytometry by Confocal Microscopy in 3D
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of Accurate and Fast DNA Cytometry by Confocal Microscopy in 3D
title_short Implementation of Accurate and Fast DNA Cytometry by Confocal Microscopy in 3D
title_sort implementation of accurate and fast dna cytometry by confocal microscopy in 3d
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4615959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16308471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2005/289216
work_keys_str_mv AT ploegerlennerts implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d
AT huismanandre implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d
AT vandergugtenjurryt implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d
AT vandergiezendionnem implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d
AT belienjeroenam implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d
AT abbakerabdelhadiy implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d
AT dullenshubfj implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d
AT grizzlewilliam implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d
AT poulinnealm implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d
AT meijergerrita implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d
AT vandiestpaulj implementationofaccurateandfastdnacytometrybyconfocalmicroscopyin3d