Cargando…

Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts

Non-invasive assessment of the perfusion capacity of tissue engineered constructs grown on the chorioallantoic membrane by MRI is often hampered by motion artifacts. Therefore, we examined the suitability of three anesthetic regimes for sufficient sedation of the chick embryo. Medetomidine at a dosa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waschkies, Conny, Nicholls, Flora, Buschmann, Johanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26493765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15536
_version_ 1782396554173218816
author Waschkies, Conny
Nicholls, Flora
Buschmann, Johanna
author_facet Waschkies, Conny
Nicholls, Flora
Buschmann, Johanna
author_sort Waschkies, Conny
collection PubMed
description Non-invasive assessment of the perfusion capacity of tissue engineered constructs grown on the chorioallantoic membrane by MRI is often hampered by motion artifacts. Therefore, we examined the suitability of three anesthetic regimes for sufficient sedation of the chick embryo. Medetomidine at a dosage of 0.3 mg/kg, was compared to thiopental at 100 mg/kg and ketamine/midazolam at 50 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, respectively. These soluble anesthetics were applied by dropping a total volume of 0.3 mL onto the surface of the CAM. Motion was videotaped through the window of the eggshell and scored semi-quantitatively. Medetomidine performed best in terms of reduced motion; onset of anesthesia occurred within 10 minutes and for the following 30 minutes, allowing proper in vivo MRI measurements. The other regimen were not sedating deep enough (ketamine/midazolam) and not long enough (thiopental). In sum, medetomidine allows proper sedation for MRI assessment of the perfusion capacity in a tissue engineered construct placed on the CAM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4616043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46160432015-10-29 Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts Waschkies, Conny Nicholls, Flora Buschmann, Johanna Sci Rep Article Non-invasive assessment of the perfusion capacity of tissue engineered constructs grown on the chorioallantoic membrane by MRI is often hampered by motion artifacts. Therefore, we examined the suitability of three anesthetic regimes for sufficient sedation of the chick embryo. Medetomidine at a dosage of 0.3 mg/kg, was compared to thiopental at 100 mg/kg and ketamine/midazolam at 50 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg, respectively. These soluble anesthetics were applied by dropping a total volume of 0.3 mL onto the surface of the CAM. Motion was videotaped through the window of the eggshell and scored semi-quantitatively. Medetomidine performed best in terms of reduced motion; onset of anesthesia occurred within 10 minutes and for the following 30 minutes, allowing proper in vivo MRI measurements. The other regimen were not sedating deep enough (ketamine/midazolam) and not long enough (thiopental). In sum, medetomidine allows proper sedation for MRI assessment of the perfusion capacity in a tissue engineered construct placed on the CAM. Nature Publishing Group 2015-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4616043/ /pubmed/26493765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15536 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Waschkies, Conny
Nicholls, Flora
Buschmann, Johanna
Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts
title Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts
title_full Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts
title_fullStr Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts
title_short Comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo Magnetic Resonance Imaging free of motion artifacts
title_sort comparison of medetomidine, thiopental and ketamine/midazolam anesthesia in chick embryos for in ovo magnetic resonance imaging free of motion artifacts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26493765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep15536
work_keys_str_mv AT waschkiesconny comparisonofmedetomidinethiopentalandketaminemidazolamanesthesiainchickembryosforinovomagneticresonanceimagingfreeofmotionartifacts
AT nichollsflora comparisonofmedetomidinethiopentalandketaminemidazolamanesthesiainchickembryosforinovomagneticresonanceimagingfreeofmotionartifacts
AT buschmannjohanna comparisonofmedetomidinethiopentalandketaminemidazolamanesthesiainchickembryosforinovomagneticresonanceimagingfreeofmotionartifacts