Cargando…
The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation
Vascular cutdown and echo guide puncture methods have its own limitations under certain conditions. There was no available algorithm for choosing entry vessel. A standard algorithm was introduced to help choose the entry vessel location according to our clinical experience and review of the literatu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26287429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001381 |
_version_ | 1782396633621725184 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Wen-Cheng Wu, Ching-Yang Wu, Ching-Feng Fu, Jui-Ying Su, Ta-Wei Yu, Sheng-Yueh Kao, Tsung-Chi Ko, Po-Jen |
author_facet | Wei, Wen-Cheng Wu, Ching-Yang Wu, Ching-Feng Fu, Jui-Ying Su, Ta-Wei Yu, Sheng-Yueh Kao, Tsung-Chi Ko, Po-Jen |
author_sort | Wei, Wen-Cheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vascular cutdown and echo guide puncture methods have its own limitations under certain conditions. There was no available algorithm for choosing entry vessel. A standard algorithm was introduced to help choose the entry vessel location according to our clinical experience and review of the literature. The goal of this study is to analyze the treatment results of the standard algorithm used to choose the entry vessel for intravenous port implantation. During the period between March 2012 and March 2013, 507 patients who received intravenous port implantation due to advanced chemotherapy were included into this study. Choice of entry vessel was according to standard algorithm. All clinical characteristic factors were collected and complication rate and incidence were further analyzed. Compared with our clinical experience in 2006, procedure-related complication rate declined from 1.09% to 0.4%, whereas the late complication rate decreased from 19.97% to 3.55%. No more pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, fractures, and pocket erosion were identified after using the standard algorithm. In alive oncology patients, 98% implanted port could serve a functional vascular access to fit therapeutic needs. This standard algorithm for choosing the best entry vessel is a simple guideline that is easy to follow. The algorithm has excellent efficiency and can minimize complication rates and incidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4616437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46164372015-10-27 The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation Wei, Wen-Cheng Wu, Ching-Yang Wu, Ching-Feng Fu, Jui-Ying Su, Ta-Wei Yu, Sheng-Yueh Kao, Tsung-Chi Ko, Po-Jen Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Vascular cutdown and echo guide puncture methods have its own limitations under certain conditions. There was no available algorithm for choosing entry vessel. A standard algorithm was introduced to help choose the entry vessel location according to our clinical experience and review of the literature. The goal of this study is to analyze the treatment results of the standard algorithm used to choose the entry vessel for intravenous port implantation. During the period between March 2012 and March 2013, 507 patients who received intravenous port implantation due to advanced chemotherapy were included into this study. Choice of entry vessel was according to standard algorithm. All clinical characteristic factors were collected and complication rate and incidence were further analyzed. Compared with our clinical experience in 2006, procedure-related complication rate declined from 1.09% to 0.4%, whereas the late complication rate decreased from 19.97% to 3.55%. No more pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, fractures, and pocket erosion were identified after using the standard algorithm. In alive oncology patients, 98% implanted port could serve a functional vascular access to fit therapeutic needs. This standard algorithm for choosing the best entry vessel is a simple guideline that is easy to follow. The algorithm has excellent efficiency and can minimize complication rates and incidence. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4616437/ /pubmed/26287429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001381 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7100 Wei, Wen-Cheng Wu, Ching-Yang Wu, Ching-Feng Fu, Jui-Ying Su, Ta-Wei Yu, Sheng-Yueh Kao, Tsung-Chi Ko, Po-Jen The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation |
title | The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation |
title_full | The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation |
title_fullStr | The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation |
title_short | The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation |
title_sort | treatment results of a standard algorithm for choosing the best entry vessel for intravenous port implantation |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26287429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001381 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weiwencheng thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT wuchingyang thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT wuchingfeng thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT fujuiying thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT sutawei thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT yushengyueh thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT kaotsungchi thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT kopojen thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT weiwencheng treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT wuchingyang treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT wuchingfeng treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT fujuiying treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT sutawei treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT yushengyueh treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT kaotsungchi treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation AT kopojen treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation |