Cargando…

The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation

Vascular cutdown and echo guide puncture methods have its own limitations under certain conditions. There was no available algorithm for choosing entry vessel. A standard algorithm was introduced to help choose the entry vessel location according to our clinical experience and review of the literatu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Wen-Cheng, Wu, Ching-Yang, Wu, Ching-Feng, Fu, Jui-Ying, Su, Ta-Wei, Yu, Sheng-Yueh, Kao, Tsung-Chi, Ko, Po-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26287429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001381
_version_ 1782396633621725184
author Wei, Wen-Cheng
Wu, Ching-Yang
Wu, Ching-Feng
Fu, Jui-Ying
Su, Ta-Wei
Yu, Sheng-Yueh
Kao, Tsung-Chi
Ko, Po-Jen
author_facet Wei, Wen-Cheng
Wu, Ching-Yang
Wu, Ching-Feng
Fu, Jui-Ying
Su, Ta-Wei
Yu, Sheng-Yueh
Kao, Tsung-Chi
Ko, Po-Jen
author_sort Wei, Wen-Cheng
collection PubMed
description Vascular cutdown and echo guide puncture methods have its own limitations under certain conditions. There was no available algorithm for choosing entry vessel. A standard algorithm was introduced to help choose the entry vessel location according to our clinical experience and review of the literature. The goal of this study is to analyze the treatment results of the standard algorithm used to choose the entry vessel for intravenous port implantation. During the period between March 2012 and March 2013, 507 patients who received intravenous port implantation due to advanced chemotherapy were included into this study. Choice of entry vessel was according to standard algorithm. All clinical characteristic factors were collected and complication rate and incidence were further analyzed. Compared with our clinical experience in 2006, procedure-related complication rate declined from 1.09% to 0.4%, whereas the late complication rate decreased from 19.97% to 3.55%. No more pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, fractures, and pocket erosion were identified after using the standard algorithm. In alive oncology patients, 98% implanted port could serve a functional vascular access to fit therapeutic needs. This standard algorithm for choosing the best entry vessel is a simple guideline that is easy to follow. The algorithm has excellent efficiency and can minimize complication rates and incidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4616437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46164372015-10-27 The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation Wei, Wen-Cheng Wu, Ching-Yang Wu, Ching-Feng Fu, Jui-Ying Su, Ta-Wei Yu, Sheng-Yueh Kao, Tsung-Chi Ko, Po-Jen Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Vascular cutdown and echo guide puncture methods have its own limitations under certain conditions. There was no available algorithm for choosing entry vessel. A standard algorithm was introduced to help choose the entry vessel location according to our clinical experience and review of the literature. The goal of this study is to analyze the treatment results of the standard algorithm used to choose the entry vessel for intravenous port implantation. During the period between March 2012 and March 2013, 507 patients who received intravenous port implantation due to advanced chemotherapy were included into this study. Choice of entry vessel was according to standard algorithm. All clinical characteristic factors were collected and complication rate and incidence were further analyzed. Compared with our clinical experience in 2006, procedure-related complication rate declined from 1.09% to 0.4%, whereas the late complication rate decreased from 19.97% to 3.55%. No more pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, fractures, and pocket erosion were identified after using the standard algorithm. In alive oncology patients, 98% implanted port could serve a functional vascular access to fit therapeutic needs. This standard algorithm for choosing the best entry vessel is a simple guideline that is easy to follow. The algorithm has excellent efficiency and can minimize complication rates and incidence. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4616437/ /pubmed/26287429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001381 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Wei, Wen-Cheng
Wu, Ching-Yang
Wu, Ching-Feng
Fu, Jui-Ying
Su, Ta-Wei
Yu, Sheng-Yueh
Kao, Tsung-Chi
Ko, Po-Jen
The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation
title The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation
title_full The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation
title_fullStr The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation
title_full_unstemmed The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation
title_short The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation
title_sort treatment results of a standard algorithm for choosing the best entry vessel for intravenous port implantation
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26287429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001381
work_keys_str_mv AT weiwencheng thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT wuchingyang thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT wuchingfeng thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT fujuiying thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT sutawei thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT yushengyueh thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT kaotsungchi thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT kopojen thetreatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT weiwencheng treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT wuchingyang treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT wuchingfeng treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT fujuiying treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT sutawei treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT yushengyueh treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT kaotsungchi treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation
AT kopojen treatmentresultsofastandardalgorithmforchoosingthebestentryvesselforintravenousportimplantation