Cargando…

Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts

This article aims to elucidate the classification of and optimal treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts. Various approaches, including endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, and open surgery, have been employed for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. However, no scientific classification of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Gang, Wan, Mei Hua, Xie, Kun-Lin, Li, Wei, Hu, Wei-Ming, Liu, Xu-Bao, Tang, Wen-Fu, Wu, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26091462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000960
_version_ 1782396660878409728
author Pan, Gang
Wan, Mei Hua
Xie, Kun-Lin
Li, Wei
Hu, Wei-Ming
Liu, Xu-Bao
Tang, Wen-Fu
Wu, Hong
author_facet Pan, Gang
Wan, Mei Hua
Xie, Kun-Lin
Li, Wei
Hu, Wei-Ming
Liu, Xu-Bao
Tang, Wen-Fu
Wu, Hong
author_sort Pan, Gang
collection PubMed
description This article aims to elucidate the classification of and optimal treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts. Various approaches, including endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, and open surgery, have been employed for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. However, no scientific classification of pancreatic pseudocysts has been devised, which could assist in the selection of optimal therapy. We evaluated the treatment modalities used in 893 patients diagnosed with pancreatic pseudocysts according to the revision of the Atlanta classification in our department between 2001 and 2010. All the pancreatic pseudocysts have course of disease >4 weeks and have mature cysts wall detected by computed tomography or transabdominal ultrasonography. Endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, or open surgery was selected on the basis of the pseudocyst characteristics. Clinical data and patient outcomes were reviewed. Among the 893 patients, 13 (1.5%) had percutaneous drainage. Eighty-three (9%) had type I pancreatic pseudocysts and were treated with observation. Ten patients (1%) had type II pseudocysts and underwent the Whipple procedure or resection of the pancreatic body and tail. Forty-six patients (5.2%) had type III pseudocysts: 44 (4.9%) underwent surgical internal drainage and 2 (0.2%) underwent endoscopic drainage. Five hundred six patients (56.7%) had type IV pseudocysts: 297 (33.3%) underwent surgical internal drainage and 209 (23.4%) underwent endoscopic drainage. Finally, 235 patients (26.3%) had type V pseudocysts: 36 (4%) underwent distal pancreatectomy or splenectomy and 199 (22.3%) underwent endoscopic drainage. A new classification system was devised, based on the size, anatomical location, and clinical manifestations of the pancreatic pseudocyst along with the relationship between the pseudocyst and the pancreatic duct. Different therapeutic strategies could be considered based on this classification. When clinically feasible, endoscopic drainage should be considered the optimal management strategy for pancreatic pseudocysts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4616556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46165562015-10-27 Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts Pan, Gang Wan, Mei Hua Xie, Kun-Lin Li, Wei Hu, Wei-Ming Liu, Xu-Bao Tang, Wen-Fu Wu, Hong Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 This article aims to elucidate the classification of and optimal treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts. Various approaches, including endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, and open surgery, have been employed for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. However, no scientific classification of pancreatic pseudocysts has been devised, which could assist in the selection of optimal therapy. We evaluated the treatment modalities used in 893 patients diagnosed with pancreatic pseudocysts according to the revision of the Atlanta classification in our department between 2001 and 2010. All the pancreatic pseudocysts have course of disease >4 weeks and have mature cysts wall detected by computed tomography or transabdominal ultrasonography. Endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, or open surgery was selected on the basis of the pseudocyst characteristics. Clinical data and patient outcomes were reviewed. Among the 893 patients, 13 (1.5%) had percutaneous drainage. Eighty-three (9%) had type I pancreatic pseudocysts and were treated with observation. Ten patients (1%) had type II pseudocysts and underwent the Whipple procedure or resection of the pancreatic body and tail. Forty-six patients (5.2%) had type III pseudocysts: 44 (4.9%) underwent surgical internal drainage and 2 (0.2%) underwent endoscopic drainage. Five hundred six patients (56.7%) had type IV pseudocysts: 297 (33.3%) underwent surgical internal drainage and 209 (23.4%) underwent endoscopic drainage. Finally, 235 patients (26.3%) had type V pseudocysts: 36 (4%) underwent distal pancreatectomy or splenectomy and 199 (22.3%) underwent endoscopic drainage. A new classification system was devised, based on the size, anatomical location, and clinical manifestations of the pancreatic pseudocyst along with the relationship between the pseudocyst and the pancreatic duct. Different therapeutic strategies could be considered based on this classification. When clinically feasible, endoscopic drainage should be considered the optimal management strategy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4616556/ /pubmed/26091462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000960 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Pan, Gang
Wan, Mei Hua
Xie, Kun-Lin
Li, Wei
Hu, Wei-Ming
Liu, Xu-Bao
Tang, Wen-Fu
Wu, Hong
Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts
title Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts
title_full Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts
title_fullStr Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts
title_full_unstemmed Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts
title_short Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts
title_sort classification and management of pancreatic pseudocysts
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26091462
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000960
work_keys_str_mv AT pangang classificationandmanagementofpancreaticpseudocysts
AT wanmeihua classificationandmanagementofpancreaticpseudocysts
AT xiekunlin classificationandmanagementofpancreaticpseudocysts
AT liwei classificationandmanagementofpancreaticpseudocysts
AT huweiming classificationandmanagementofpancreaticpseudocysts
AT liuxubao classificationandmanagementofpancreaticpseudocysts
AT tangwenfu classificationandmanagementofpancreaticpseudocysts
AT wuhong classificationandmanagementofpancreaticpseudocysts