Cargando…

Heparin Saline Versus Normal Saline for Flushing and Locking Peripheral Venous Catheters in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A prospective randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of heparin saline (HS) to those of normal saline (NS) as flushing and locking solutions for peripheral venous catheter (PVC) in decompensated liver cirrhosis (DLC) patients. Patients with DLC at our in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Rui, Zhang, Ming-Guang, Luo, Ou, He, Liu, Li, Jia-Xin, Tang, Yun-Jing, Luo, Yan-Li, Zhou, Min, Tang, Li, Zhang, Zong-Xia, Wu, Hao, Chen, Xin-Zu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26252305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001292
_version_ 1782396669025845248
author Wang, Rui
Zhang, Ming-Guang
Luo, Ou
He, Liu
Li, Jia-Xin
Tang, Yun-Jing
Luo, Yan-Li
Zhou, Min
Tang, Li
Zhang, Zong-Xia
Wu, Hao
Chen, Xin-Zu
author_facet Wang, Rui
Zhang, Ming-Guang
Luo, Ou
He, Liu
Li, Jia-Xin
Tang, Yun-Jing
Luo, Yan-Li
Zhou, Min
Tang, Li
Zhang, Zong-Xia
Wu, Hao
Chen, Xin-Zu
author_sort Wang, Rui
collection PubMed
description A prospective randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of heparin saline (HS) to those of normal saline (NS) as flushing and locking solutions for peripheral venous catheter (PVC) in decompensated liver cirrhosis (DLC) patients. Patients with DLC at our institution between April 2012 and March 2013 were enrolled after obtaining informed consent. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups: the NS group received preservative-free 0.9% sodium chloride as the flushing and locking solution, while the HS group received HS (50 U/mL). PVC-related events and the duration of PVC maintenance were compared between the 2 groups. Moreover, the preinfusion and postinfusion levels of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and platelet (PLT) were also compared. A total of 32 and 36 DLC patients in the NS (125 PVCs) and HS (65 PVCs) groups, respectively, were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, including gender, age, Child–Pugh grade, PVC type and administration of anticoagulant, and irritant agents, were comparable between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The maintenance times of the HS and NS groups were 80.27 ± 26.47 and 84.19 ± 29.32 hours, respectively (P = 0.397). Removal of PVC for abnormal reasons occurred in 30.7% and 22.4% of patients in the HS and NS groups (P = 0.208). The PVC occlusion rates were 6.2% and 5.6% in the HS and NS groups, respectively (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.31–3.92). The PT, APTT, and PLT levels were comparable between the 2 groups both before and after infusion (P > 0.05). Incremental analyses showed that Child–Pugh grade C might be a risk factor for the suppression of PLT in the HS group. We consider NS to be as effective as and safer than conventional HS for flushing and locking PVC in decompensated liver cirrhosis patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4616592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46165922015-10-27 Heparin Saline Versus Normal Saline for Flushing and Locking Peripheral Venous Catheters in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Wang, Rui Zhang, Ming-Guang Luo, Ou He, Liu Li, Jia-Xin Tang, Yun-Jing Luo, Yan-Li Zhou, Min Tang, Li Zhang, Zong-Xia Wu, Hao Chen, Xin-Zu Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 A prospective randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of heparin saline (HS) to those of normal saline (NS) as flushing and locking solutions for peripheral venous catheter (PVC) in decompensated liver cirrhosis (DLC) patients. Patients with DLC at our institution between April 2012 and March 2013 were enrolled after obtaining informed consent. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups: the NS group received preservative-free 0.9% sodium chloride as the flushing and locking solution, while the HS group received HS (50 U/mL). PVC-related events and the duration of PVC maintenance were compared between the 2 groups. Moreover, the preinfusion and postinfusion levels of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and platelet (PLT) were also compared. A total of 32 and 36 DLC patients in the NS (125 PVCs) and HS (65 PVCs) groups, respectively, were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, including gender, age, Child–Pugh grade, PVC type and administration of anticoagulant, and irritant agents, were comparable between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The maintenance times of the HS and NS groups were 80.27 ± 26.47 and 84.19 ± 29.32 hours, respectively (P = 0.397). Removal of PVC for abnormal reasons occurred in 30.7% and 22.4% of patients in the HS and NS groups (P = 0.208). The PVC occlusion rates were 6.2% and 5.6% in the HS and NS groups, respectively (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.31–3.92). The PT, APTT, and PLT levels were comparable between the 2 groups both before and after infusion (P > 0.05). Incremental analyses showed that Child–Pugh grade C might be a risk factor for the suppression of PLT in the HS group. We consider NS to be as effective as and safer than conventional HS for flushing and locking PVC in decompensated liver cirrhosis patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4616592/ /pubmed/26252305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001292 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Wang, Rui
Zhang, Ming-Guang
Luo, Ou
He, Liu
Li, Jia-Xin
Tang, Yun-Jing
Luo, Yan-Li
Zhou, Min
Tang, Li
Zhang, Zong-Xia
Wu, Hao
Chen, Xin-Zu
Heparin Saline Versus Normal Saline for Flushing and Locking Peripheral Venous Catheters in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Heparin Saline Versus Normal Saline for Flushing and Locking Peripheral Venous Catheters in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Heparin Saline Versus Normal Saline for Flushing and Locking Peripheral Venous Catheters in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Heparin Saline Versus Normal Saline for Flushing and Locking Peripheral Venous Catheters in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Heparin Saline Versus Normal Saline for Flushing and Locking Peripheral Venous Catheters in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Heparin Saline Versus Normal Saline for Flushing and Locking Peripheral Venous Catheters in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort heparin saline versus normal saline for flushing and locking peripheral venous catheters in decompensated liver cirrhosis patients: a randomized controlled trial
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26252305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001292
work_keys_str_mv AT wangrui heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangmingguang heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luoou heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT heliu heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lijiaxin heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tangyunjing heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luoyanli heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhoumin heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tangli heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangzongxia heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuhao heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenxinzu heparinsalineversusnormalsalineforflushingandlockingperipheralvenouscathetersindecompensatedlivercirrhosispatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial