Cargando…

The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging

The correlation between color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) for detecting blood flow in breast lesions was investigated, as was the diagnostic value of SMI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. These lesions were evaluated using both CDFI and S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yan, Li, Gang, Li, Jing, Ren, Wei-dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26356718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001502
_version_ 1782396683399725056
author Ma, Yan
Li, Gang
Li, Jing
Ren, Wei-dong
author_facet Ma, Yan
Li, Gang
Li, Jing
Ren, Wei-dong
author_sort Ma, Yan
collection PubMed
description The correlation between color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) for detecting blood flow in breast lesions was investigated, as was the diagnostic value of SMI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. These lesions were evaluated using both CDFI and SMI according to Adler's method. Pathologic examination showed 57 malignant lesions and 66 benign lesions. The number of blood vessels in a single mass was detected by 2 techniques (SMI and CDFI), and the difference between the 2 values (SMI-CDFI) was calculated. The optimal threshold for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasms and the diagnostic performances of SMI, CDFI, and SMI-CDFI were calculated. For the total lesions and malignant lesions alone, the difference between SMI and CDFI for detecting blood flow was significant (P < 0.01), but the difference was not significant for benign lesions (P = 0.15). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64–0.82) for CDFI; 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74–0.89) for SMI; and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82–0.95) for SMI-CDFI. Furthermore, the modality of “SMI-CDFI” showed the best diagnostic performance. SMI provides further microvessel information in breast lesions. The diagnostic modality of “SMI-CDFI” can improve the diagnostic performance of ultrasound in the differentiation between benign and malignant masses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4616654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46166542015-10-27 The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging Ma, Yan Li, Gang Li, Jing Ren, Wei-dong Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 The correlation between color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) for detecting blood flow in breast lesions was investigated, as was the diagnostic value of SMI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. These lesions were evaluated using both CDFI and SMI according to Adler's method. Pathologic examination showed 57 malignant lesions and 66 benign lesions. The number of blood vessels in a single mass was detected by 2 techniques (SMI and CDFI), and the difference between the 2 values (SMI-CDFI) was calculated. The optimal threshold for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasms and the diagnostic performances of SMI, CDFI, and SMI-CDFI were calculated. For the total lesions and malignant lesions alone, the difference between SMI and CDFI for detecting blood flow was significant (P < 0.01), but the difference was not significant for benign lesions (P = 0.15). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64–0.82) for CDFI; 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74–0.89) for SMI; and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82–0.95) for SMI-CDFI. Furthermore, the modality of “SMI-CDFI” showed the best diagnostic performance. SMI provides further microvessel information in breast lesions. The diagnostic modality of “SMI-CDFI” can improve the diagnostic performance of ultrasound in the differentiation between benign and malignant masses. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4616654/ /pubmed/26356718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001502 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 6800
Ma, Yan
Li, Gang
Li, Jing
Ren, Wei-dong
The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging
title The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging
title_full The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging
title_fullStr The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging
title_full_unstemmed The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging
title_short The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging
title_sort diagnostic value of superb microvascular imaging (smi) in detecting blood flow signals of breast lesions: a preliminary study comparing smi to color doppler flow imaging
topic 6800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26356718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001502
work_keys_str_mv AT mayan thediagnosticvalueofsuperbmicrovascularimagingsmiindetectingbloodflowsignalsofbreastlesionsapreliminarystudycomparingsmitocolordopplerflowimaging
AT ligang thediagnosticvalueofsuperbmicrovascularimagingsmiindetectingbloodflowsignalsofbreastlesionsapreliminarystudycomparingsmitocolordopplerflowimaging
AT lijing thediagnosticvalueofsuperbmicrovascularimagingsmiindetectingbloodflowsignalsofbreastlesionsapreliminarystudycomparingsmitocolordopplerflowimaging
AT renweidong thediagnosticvalueofsuperbmicrovascularimagingsmiindetectingbloodflowsignalsofbreastlesionsapreliminarystudycomparingsmitocolordopplerflowimaging
AT mayan diagnosticvalueofsuperbmicrovascularimagingsmiindetectingbloodflowsignalsofbreastlesionsapreliminarystudycomparingsmitocolordopplerflowimaging
AT ligang diagnosticvalueofsuperbmicrovascularimagingsmiindetectingbloodflowsignalsofbreastlesionsapreliminarystudycomparingsmitocolordopplerflowimaging
AT lijing diagnosticvalueofsuperbmicrovascularimagingsmiindetectingbloodflowsignalsofbreastlesionsapreliminarystudycomparingsmitocolordopplerflowimaging
AT renweidong diagnosticvalueofsuperbmicrovascularimagingsmiindetectingbloodflowsignalsofbreastlesionsapreliminarystudycomparingsmitocolordopplerflowimaging