Cargando…

Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS

The primary aim was to compare postoperative radiographic outcomes between sexes among adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. A total of 162 AIS patients (42 males and 120 females) undergoing pedicle screw instrumentation and posterior fusion were included. Coronal and sagittal curves and f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Ximing, Wang, Fei, Zhou, Xiaoyi, Cheng, Yajun, Wei, Xianzhao, Bai, Yushu, Li, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26469897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001616
_version_ 1782396714003464192
author Xu, Ximing
Wang, Fei
Zhou, Xiaoyi
Cheng, Yajun
Wei, Xianzhao
Bai, Yushu
Li, Ming
author_facet Xu, Ximing
Wang, Fei
Zhou, Xiaoyi
Cheng, Yajun
Wei, Xianzhao
Bai, Yushu
Li, Ming
author_sort Xu, Ximing
collection PubMed
description The primary aim was to compare postoperative radiographic outcomes between sexes among adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. A total of 162 AIS patients (42 males and 120 females) undergoing pedicle screw instrumentation and posterior fusion were included. Coronal and sagittal curves and flexibilities were measured and calculated. The postoperative correction rate (CR), fulcrum bending correction index (FBCI), and Cincinnati correction index were evaluated to compare the surgical benefits between sexes. Males were older (16.79 vs 14.79 years, respectively; P < 0.01) and had stiffer curves than females (lateral bending flexibility percentage: 47.77 vs 52.57, respectively, P = 0.21; traction flexibility percentage: 35.48 vs 36.98, respectively, P = 0.98; fulcrum bending flexibility percentage: 56.13 vs 66.57, respectively, P < 0.05). Males and females exhibited similar Lenke classification schemes (P = 0.72), but had different Risser signs (P < 0.01). Although males had greater postoperative curves (20.81° vs 16.83°, respectively; P = 0.009), no obvious differences in the CRs were noted between males and females (FBCI: 145.20% vs 108.37%, respectively; P = 0.92). Smaller preoperative lumbar lordosis was noted in males than in females (40.05° vs 45.72°, respectively; P = 0.03), yet no statistically significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative sagittal curves were observed between the sexes. In conclusion, considering the preoperative flexibilities, the 2 sexes achieved comparable surgical benefits without sacrificing the sagittal balance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4616792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46167922015-10-27 Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS Xu, Ximing Wang, Fei Zhou, Xiaoyi Cheng, Yajun Wei, Xianzhao Bai, Yushu Li, Ming Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 The primary aim was to compare postoperative radiographic outcomes between sexes among adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. A total of 162 AIS patients (42 males and 120 females) undergoing pedicle screw instrumentation and posterior fusion were included. Coronal and sagittal curves and flexibilities were measured and calculated. The postoperative correction rate (CR), fulcrum bending correction index (FBCI), and Cincinnati correction index were evaluated to compare the surgical benefits between sexes. Males were older (16.79 vs 14.79 years, respectively; P < 0.01) and had stiffer curves than females (lateral bending flexibility percentage: 47.77 vs 52.57, respectively, P = 0.21; traction flexibility percentage: 35.48 vs 36.98, respectively, P = 0.98; fulcrum bending flexibility percentage: 56.13 vs 66.57, respectively, P < 0.05). Males and females exhibited similar Lenke classification schemes (P = 0.72), but had different Risser signs (P < 0.01). Although males had greater postoperative curves (20.81° vs 16.83°, respectively; P = 0.009), no obvious differences in the CRs were noted between males and females (FBCI: 145.20% vs 108.37%, respectively; P = 0.92). Smaller preoperative lumbar lordosis was noted in males than in females (40.05° vs 45.72°, respectively; P = 0.03), yet no statistically significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative sagittal curves were observed between the sexes. In conclusion, considering the preoperative flexibilities, the 2 sexes achieved comparable surgical benefits without sacrificing the sagittal balance. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4616792/ /pubmed/26469897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001616 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Xu, Ximing
Wang, Fei
Zhou, Xiaoyi
Cheng, Yajun
Wei, Xianzhao
Bai, Yushu
Li, Ming
Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS
title Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS
title_full Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS
title_fullStr Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS
title_short Comparison of Radiographic Postoperative Outcomes Between Males and Females With AIS
title_sort comparison of radiographic postoperative outcomes between males and females with ais
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26469897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001616
work_keys_str_mv AT xuximing comparisonofradiographicpostoperativeoutcomesbetweenmalesandfemaleswithais
AT wangfei comparisonofradiographicpostoperativeoutcomesbetweenmalesandfemaleswithais
AT zhouxiaoyi comparisonofradiographicpostoperativeoutcomesbetweenmalesandfemaleswithais
AT chengyajun comparisonofradiographicpostoperativeoutcomesbetweenmalesandfemaleswithais
AT weixianzhao comparisonofradiographicpostoperativeoutcomesbetweenmalesandfemaleswithais
AT baiyushu comparisonofradiographicpostoperativeoutcomesbetweenmalesandfemaleswithais
AT liming comparisonofradiographicpostoperativeoutcomesbetweenmalesandfemaleswithais