Cargando…
Collection of Wound Exudate From Human Digit Tip Amputations Does Not Impair Regenerative Healing: A Randomized Trial
The regrowth of amputated digit tips represents a unique regenerative healing in mammals with subcutaneous volume regrowth, restoration of dactylogram, and suppression of scar formation. Although factor analysis in amphibians and even in mice is easy to obtain, safety of harvesting biomaterial from...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26469916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001764 |
_version_ | 1782396714460643328 |
---|---|
author | Kisch, Tobias Klemens, Julia Maria Hofmann, Katharina Liodaki, Eirini Gierloff, Matthias Moellmeier, Dirk Stang, Felix Mailaender, Peter Habermann, Jens Brandenburger, Matthias |
author_facet | Kisch, Tobias Klemens, Julia Maria Hofmann, Katharina Liodaki, Eirini Gierloff, Matthias Moellmeier, Dirk Stang, Felix Mailaender, Peter Habermann, Jens Brandenburger, Matthias |
author_sort | Kisch, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | The regrowth of amputated digit tips represents a unique regenerative healing in mammals with subcutaneous volume regrowth, restoration of dactylogram, and suppression of scar formation. Although factor analysis in amphibians and even in mice is easy to obtain, safety of harvesting biomaterial from human digit tip amputations for analysis has not yet been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate if recovering wound exudate does hamper clinical outcome or influence microbiologic or inflammation status. A predefined cohort of 18 patients with fresh digit tip amputations was randomly assigned to receive standard therapy (debridement, occlusive dressing) with (n = 9) or without (n = 9) collection of the whole wound exudate in every dressing change. Primary endpoint (lengthening) and secondary endpoints (regeneration of dactylogram, nail bed and bone healing, time to complete wound closure, scar formation, 2-point discrimination, microbiologic analysis, inflammatory factors interleukin (IL)-1α, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-4, and IL-6) were determined by an independent, blinded observer. Patients’ characteristics showed no significant differences between the groups. All patients completed the study to the end of 3 months follow-up. Exudate collection did not influence primary and secondary endpoints. Furthermore, positive microbiologic findings as well as pus- and necrosis-like appearance neither impaired tissue restoration nor influenced inflammatory factor release. Here, the authors developed an easy and safe protocol for harvesting wound exudate from human digit tip amputations. For the first time, it was shown that harvesting does not impair regenerative healing. Using this method, further studies can be conducted to analyze regeneration associated factors in the human digit tip. DRKS.de Identifier: DRKS00006882 (UTN: U1111-1166-5723). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4616794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46167942015-10-27 Collection of Wound Exudate From Human Digit Tip Amputations Does Not Impair Regenerative Healing: A Randomized Trial Kisch, Tobias Klemens, Julia Maria Hofmann, Katharina Liodaki, Eirini Gierloff, Matthias Moellmeier, Dirk Stang, Felix Mailaender, Peter Habermann, Jens Brandenburger, Matthias Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 The regrowth of amputated digit tips represents a unique regenerative healing in mammals with subcutaneous volume regrowth, restoration of dactylogram, and suppression of scar formation. Although factor analysis in amphibians and even in mice is easy to obtain, safety of harvesting biomaterial from human digit tip amputations for analysis has not yet been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate if recovering wound exudate does hamper clinical outcome or influence microbiologic or inflammation status. A predefined cohort of 18 patients with fresh digit tip amputations was randomly assigned to receive standard therapy (debridement, occlusive dressing) with (n = 9) or without (n = 9) collection of the whole wound exudate in every dressing change. Primary endpoint (lengthening) and secondary endpoints (regeneration of dactylogram, nail bed and bone healing, time to complete wound closure, scar formation, 2-point discrimination, microbiologic analysis, inflammatory factors interleukin (IL)-1α, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-4, and IL-6) were determined by an independent, blinded observer. Patients’ characteristics showed no significant differences between the groups. All patients completed the study to the end of 3 months follow-up. Exudate collection did not influence primary and secondary endpoints. Furthermore, positive microbiologic findings as well as pus- and necrosis-like appearance neither impaired tissue restoration nor influenced inflammatory factor release. Here, the authors developed an easy and safe protocol for harvesting wound exudate from human digit tip amputations. For the first time, it was shown that harvesting does not impair regenerative healing. Using this method, further studies can be conducted to analyze regeneration associated factors in the human digit tip. DRKS.de Identifier: DRKS00006882 (UTN: U1111-1166-5723). Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4616794/ /pubmed/26469916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001764 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7100 Kisch, Tobias Klemens, Julia Maria Hofmann, Katharina Liodaki, Eirini Gierloff, Matthias Moellmeier, Dirk Stang, Felix Mailaender, Peter Habermann, Jens Brandenburger, Matthias Collection of Wound Exudate From Human Digit Tip Amputations Does Not Impair Regenerative Healing: A Randomized Trial |
title | Collection of Wound Exudate From Human Digit Tip Amputations Does Not Impair Regenerative Healing: A Randomized Trial |
title_full | Collection of Wound Exudate From Human Digit Tip Amputations Does Not Impair Regenerative Healing: A Randomized Trial |
title_fullStr | Collection of Wound Exudate From Human Digit Tip Amputations Does Not Impair Regenerative Healing: A Randomized Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Collection of Wound Exudate From Human Digit Tip Amputations Does Not Impair Regenerative Healing: A Randomized Trial |
title_short | Collection of Wound Exudate From Human Digit Tip Amputations Does Not Impair Regenerative Healing: A Randomized Trial |
title_sort | collection of wound exudate from human digit tip amputations does not impair regenerative healing: a randomized trial |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4616794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26469916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kischtobias collectionofwoundexudatefromhumandigittipamputationsdoesnotimpairregenerativehealingarandomizedtrial AT klemensjuliamaria collectionofwoundexudatefromhumandigittipamputationsdoesnotimpairregenerativehealingarandomizedtrial AT hofmannkatharina collectionofwoundexudatefromhumandigittipamputationsdoesnotimpairregenerativehealingarandomizedtrial AT liodakieirini collectionofwoundexudatefromhumandigittipamputationsdoesnotimpairregenerativehealingarandomizedtrial AT gierloffmatthias collectionofwoundexudatefromhumandigittipamputationsdoesnotimpairregenerativehealingarandomizedtrial AT moellmeierdirk collectionofwoundexudatefromhumandigittipamputationsdoesnotimpairregenerativehealingarandomizedtrial AT stangfelix collectionofwoundexudatefromhumandigittipamputationsdoesnotimpairregenerativehealingarandomizedtrial AT mailaenderpeter collectionofwoundexudatefromhumandigittipamputationsdoesnotimpairregenerativehealingarandomizedtrial AT habermannjens collectionofwoundexudatefromhumandigittipamputationsdoesnotimpairregenerativehealingarandomizedtrial AT brandenburgermatthias collectionofwoundexudatefromhumandigittipamputationsdoesnotimpairregenerativehealingarandomizedtrial |