Cargando…

Comparison of the effects of colloid preload, vasopressor administration and leg compression on hemodynamic changes during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position

BACKGROUND: Hypotension is a serious and the most common adverse effect of spinal anesthesia. Many studies have focused on prevention of hypotension due to spinal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three different methods of using colloid, ephedrine and wrapping of extr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talakoub, Reihanak, Fani, Abdolrahman, Hirmanpour, Anahita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605220
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.164002
_version_ 1782396742215401472
author Talakoub, Reihanak
Fani, Abdolrahman
Hirmanpour, Anahita
author_facet Talakoub, Reihanak
Fani, Abdolrahman
Hirmanpour, Anahita
author_sort Talakoub, Reihanak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypotension is a serious and the most common adverse effect of spinal anesthesia. Many studies have focused on prevention of hypotension due to spinal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three different methods of using colloid, ephedrine and wrapping of extremities on the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia following spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing elective lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180, ASA (I–II), adult patients candidate of lumbar disc surgery in one or two levels who met the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated in one of three treatment groups of receiving Voluven (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9% sodium chloride injection), ephedrine and leg wrapping. After establishment of spinal anesthesia, patients were outsourced and knee–chest position was done. Heart rate and blood pressure of patients were recorded at different times till 60 min after spinal injection. Statistical analyses of data were performed with SPSS (version 20) and by considering groups, values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Mean systolic blood pressure (119.5 ± 7.4 mmHg) and mean heart rate (71.7 ± 6.7 b/min) were higher in a group receiving Voluven (P < 0.05). The Voluven group significantly experienced less nausea and vomiting in recovery room in comparing with other groups (P = 0.027). They also received significantly less ephedrine (P = 0.012) and ondansetron [12 (20%)] (P = 0.02). Furthermore, patients receiving elastic bandage had significantly more blood loss than the other groups (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Colloid therapy was the most effective method in keeping hemodynamic stability, prevention of decrease in systolic blood pressure and incidence of side effects during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4617001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46170012015-11-24 Comparison of the effects of colloid preload, vasopressor administration and leg compression on hemodynamic changes during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position Talakoub, Reihanak Fani, Abdolrahman Hirmanpour, Anahita Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Hypotension is a serious and the most common adverse effect of spinal anesthesia. Many studies have focused on prevention of hypotension due to spinal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three different methods of using colloid, ephedrine and wrapping of extremities on the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia following spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing elective lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 180, ASA (I–II), adult patients candidate of lumbar disc surgery in one or two levels who met the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated in one of three treatment groups of receiving Voluven (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9% sodium chloride injection), ephedrine and leg wrapping. After establishment of spinal anesthesia, patients were outsourced and knee–chest position was done. Heart rate and blood pressure of patients were recorded at different times till 60 min after spinal injection. Statistical analyses of data were performed with SPSS (version 20) and by considering groups, values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Mean systolic blood pressure (119.5 ± 7.4 mmHg) and mean heart rate (71.7 ± 6.7 b/min) were higher in a group receiving Voluven (P < 0.05). The Voluven group significantly experienced less nausea and vomiting in recovery room in comparing with other groups (P = 0.027). They also received significantly less ephedrine (P = 0.012) and ondansetron [12 (20%)] (P = 0.02). Furthermore, patients receiving elastic bandage had significantly more blood loss than the other groups (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Colloid therapy was the most effective method in keeping hemodynamic stability, prevention of decrease in systolic blood pressure and incidence of side effects during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4617001/ /pubmed/26605220 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.164002 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Talakoub. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Talakoub, Reihanak
Fani, Abdolrahman
Hirmanpour, Anahita
Comparison of the effects of colloid preload, vasopressor administration and leg compression on hemodynamic changes during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position
title Comparison of the effects of colloid preload, vasopressor administration and leg compression on hemodynamic changes during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position
title_full Comparison of the effects of colloid preload, vasopressor administration and leg compression on hemodynamic changes during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of colloid preload, vasopressor administration and leg compression on hemodynamic changes during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of colloid preload, vasopressor administration and leg compression on hemodynamic changes during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position
title_short Comparison of the effects of colloid preload, vasopressor administration and leg compression on hemodynamic changes during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position
title_sort comparison of the effects of colloid preload, vasopressor administration and leg compression on hemodynamic changes during spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery in knee–chest position
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605220
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.164002
work_keys_str_mv AT talakoubreihanak comparisonoftheeffectsofcolloidpreloadvasopressoradministrationandlegcompressiononhemodynamicchangesduringspinalanesthesiaforlumbardiscsurgeryinkneechestposition
AT faniabdolrahman comparisonoftheeffectsofcolloidpreloadvasopressoradministrationandlegcompressiononhemodynamicchangesduringspinalanesthesiaforlumbardiscsurgeryinkneechestposition
AT hirmanpouranahita comparisonoftheeffectsofcolloidpreloadvasopressoradministrationandlegcompressiononhemodynamicchangesduringspinalanesthesiaforlumbardiscsurgeryinkneechestposition