Cargando…
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students’ Perspectives on the Engagement in Research
Engaging students in active learning lies at the center of effective higher education. In medical schools, students’ engagement in learning and research has come under increasing attention. The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence on medical students’ perspectives on the engagement in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26181541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001089 |
_version_ | 1782396757259321344 |
---|---|
author | Naing, Cho Wai, Victor Nyunt Durham, Jo Whittaker, Maxine A. Win, Ni Ni Aung, Kyan Mak, Joon Wah |
author_facet | Naing, Cho Wai, Victor Nyunt Durham, Jo Whittaker, Maxine A. Win, Ni Ni Aung, Kyan Mak, Joon Wah |
author_sort | Naing, Cho |
collection | PubMed |
description | Engaging students in active learning lies at the center of effective higher education. In medical schools, students’ engagement in learning and research has come under increasing attention. The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence on medical students’ perspectives on the engagement in research. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Relevant studies were searched in electronic databases. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Overall, 14 observational studies (with 17 data sets) were included. In general, many studies did not use the same questionnaires and the outcome measurements were not consistently reported; these presented some difficulties in pooling the results. Whenever data permitted, we performed pooled analysis for the 4 education outcomes. A Bayesian meta-analytical approach was supplemented as a measure of uncertainty. A pooled analysis showed that 74% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57%–11.07%; I(2): 95.2%) of those students who engaged in research (while at the medical school) had positive attitudes toward their research experiences, whereas 49.5% (95% CI: 36.4%–62.7%; I(2): 93.4%) had positive attitudes toward the study of medical sciences, 62.3% (95% CI: 46.7%–77.9%; I(2): 96.3%) had self-reported changes in their practices, and 64% (95% CI: 30.8%–96.6%; I(2): 98.5%) could have published their work. There was substantial heterogeneity among studies. We acknowledged the caveats and the merit of the current review. Findings showed that engagement in research resulted in favorable reactions toward research and academic learning. Future well-designed studies using standardized research tools on how to engage students in research are recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4617066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46170662015-10-27 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students’ Perspectives on the Engagement in Research Naing, Cho Wai, Victor Nyunt Durham, Jo Whittaker, Maxine A. Win, Ni Ni Aung, Kyan Mak, Joon Wah Medicine (Baltimore) 6600 Engaging students in active learning lies at the center of effective higher education. In medical schools, students’ engagement in learning and research has come under increasing attention. The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence on medical students’ perspectives on the engagement in research. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Relevant studies were searched in electronic databases. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed. Overall, 14 observational studies (with 17 data sets) were included. In general, many studies did not use the same questionnaires and the outcome measurements were not consistently reported; these presented some difficulties in pooling the results. Whenever data permitted, we performed pooled analysis for the 4 education outcomes. A Bayesian meta-analytical approach was supplemented as a measure of uncertainty. A pooled analysis showed that 74% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57%–11.07%; I(2): 95.2%) of those students who engaged in research (while at the medical school) had positive attitudes toward their research experiences, whereas 49.5% (95% CI: 36.4%–62.7%; I(2): 93.4%) had positive attitudes toward the study of medical sciences, 62.3% (95% CI: 46.7%–77.9%; I(2): 96.3%) had self-reported changes in their practices, and 64% (95% CI: 30.8%–96.6%; I(2): 98.5%) could have published their work. There was substantial heterogeneity among studies. We acknowledged the caveats and the merit of the current review. Findings showed that engagement in research resulted in favorable reactions toward research and academic learning. Future well-designed studies using standardized research tools on how to engage students in research are recommended. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4617066/ /pubmed/26181541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001089 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 6600 Naing, Cho Wai, Victor Nyunt Durham, Jo Whittaker, Maxine A. Win, Ni Ni Aung, Kyan Mak, Joon Wah A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students’ Perspectives on the Engagement in Research |
title | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students’ Perspectives on the Engagement in Research |
title_full | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students’ Perspectives on the Engagement in Research |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students’ Perspectives on the Engagement in Research |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students’ Perspectives on the Engagement in Research |
title_short | A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Medical Students’ Perspectives on the Engagement in Research |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of medical students’ perspectives on the engagement in research |
topic | 6600 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26181541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naingcho asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT waivictornyunt asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT durhamjo asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT whittakermaxinea asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT winnini asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT aungkyan asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT makjoonwah asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT naingcho systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT waivictornyunt systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT durhamjo systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT whittakermaxinea systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT winnini systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT aungkyan systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch AT makjoonwah systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofmedicalstudentsperspectivesontheengagementinresearch |