Cargando…
The Impact of Neutrons in Clinical Proton Therapy
In proton therapy, high-energy proton beams cause the production of secondary neutrons. This leads to an unwanted dose contribution, which can be considerable for tissues outside of the target volume regarding the long-term health of cancer patients. Due to the high biological effectiveness of neutr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00235 |
_version_ | 1782396765995008000 |
---|---|
author | Schneider, Uwe Hälg, Roger |
author_facet | Schneider, Uwe Hälg, Roger |
author_sort | Schneider, Uwe |
collection | PubMed |
description | In proton therapy, high-energy proton beams cause the production of secondary neutrons. This leads to an unwanted dose contribution, which can be considerable for tissues outside of the target volume regarding the long-term health of cancer patients. Due to the high biological effectiveness of neutrons with regard to cancer induction, small neutron doses can be important. Published comparisons of neutron dose measurements and the corresponding estimates of cancer risk between different treatment modalities differ over orders of magnitude. In this report, the controversy about the impact of the neutron dose in proton therapy is critically discussed and viewed in the light of new epidemiological studies. In summary, the impact of neutron dose on cancer risk can be determined correctly only if the dose distributions are carefully measured or computed. It is important to include not only the neutron component into comparisons but also the complete deposition of energy as precisely as possible. Cancer risk comparisons between different radiation qualities, treatment machines, and techniques have to be performed under similar conditions. It seems that in the past, the uncertainty in the models which lead from dose to risk were overestimated when compared with erroneous dose comparisons. Current risk models used with carefully obtained dose distributions predict a second cancer risk reduction for active protons vs. photons and a more or less constant risk of passive protons vs. photons. Those findings are in general agreement with newly obtained epidemiologically results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4617104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-46171042015-11-09 The Impact of Neutrons in Clinical Proton Therapy Schneider, Uwe Hälg, Roger Front Oncol Oncology In proton therapy, high-energy proton beams cause the production of secondary neutrons. This leads to an unwanted dose contribution, which can be considerable for tissues outside of the target volume regarding the long-term health of cancer patients. Due to the high biological effectiveness of neutrons with regard to cancer induction, small neutron doses can be important. Published comparisons of neutron dose measurements and the corresponding estimates of cancer risk between different treatment modalities differ over orders of magnitude. In this report, the controversy about the impact of the neutron dose in proton therapy is critically discussed and viewed in the light of new epidemiological studies. In summary, the impact of neutron dose on cancer risk can be determined correctly only if the dose distributions are carefully measured or computed. It is important to include not only the neutron component into comparisons but also the complete deposition of energy as precisely as possible. Cancer risk comparisons between different radiation qualities, treatment machines, and techniques have to be performed under similar conditions. It seems that in the past, the uncertainty in the models which lead from dose to risk were overestimated when compared with erroneous dose comparisons. Current risk models used with carefully obtained dose distributions predict a second cancer risk reduction for active protons vs. photons and a more or less constant risk of passive protons vs. photons. Those findings are in general agreement with newly obtained epidemiologically results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4617104/ /pubmed/26557501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00235 Text en Copyright © 2015 Schneider and Hälg. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Schneider, Uwe Hälg, Roger The Impact of Neutrons in Clinical Proton Therapy |
title | The Impact of Neutrons in Clinical Proton Therapy |
title_full | The Impact of Neutrons in Clinical Proton Therapy |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Neutrons in Clinical Proton Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Neutrons in Clinical Proton Therapy |
title_short | The Impact of Neutrons in Clinical Proton Therapy |
title_sort | impact of neutrons in clinical proton therapy |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26557501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schneideruwe theimpactofneutronsinclinicalprotontherapy AT halgroger theimpactofneutronsinclinicalprotontherapy AT schneideruwe impactofneutronsinclinicalprotontherapy AT halgroger impactofneutronsinclinicalprotontherapy |