Cargando…

Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube

Impulse peak insertion loss (IPIL) was studied with two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions at the E-A-RCAL Laboratory. IPIL is the difference between the maximum estimated pressure for the open-ear condition and the maximum pressure measured when a hearing protector is plac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, William J., Fackler, Cameron J., Berger, Elliott H., Shaw, Peter B., Stergar, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26356380
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.165067
_version_ 1782396784599891968
author Murphy, William J.
Fackler, Cameron J.
Berger, Elliott H.
Shaw, Peter B.
Stergar, Mike
author_facet Murphy, William J.
Fackler, Cameron J.
Berger, Elliott H.
Shaw, Peter B.
Stergar, Mike
author_sort Murphy, William J.
collection PubMed
description Impulse peak insertion loss (IPIL) was studied with two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions at the E-A-RCAL Laboratory. IPIL is the difference between the maximum estimated pressure for the open-ear condition and the maximum pressure measured when a hearing protector is placed on an acoustic test fixture (ATF). Two models of an ATF manufactured by the French-German Research Institute of Saint-Louis (ISL) were evaluated with high-level acoustic impulses created by an acoustic shock tube at levels of 134 decibels (dB), 150 dB, and 168 dB. The fixtures were identical except that the E-A-RCAL ISL fixture had ear canals that were 3 mm longer than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) ISL fixture. Four hearing protection conditions were tested: Combat Arms earplug with the valve open, ETYPlugs(®) earplug, TacticalPro headset, and a dual-protector ETYPlugs earplug with TacticalPro earmuff. The IPILs measured for the E-A-RCAL fixture were 1.4 dB greater than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) ISL ATF. For the E-A-RCAL ISL ATF, the left ear IPIL was 2.0 dB greater than the right ear IPIL. For the NIOSH ATF, the right ear IPIL was 0.3 dB greater than the left ear IPIL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4617327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46173272016-07-14 Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube Murphy, William J. Fackler, Cameron J. Berger, Elliott H. Shaw, Peter B. Stergar, Mike Noise Health Orginal Article Impulse peak insertion loss (IPIL) was studied with two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions at the E-A-RCAL Laboratory. IPIL is the difference between the maximum estimated pressure for the open-ear condition and the maximum pressure measured when a hearing protector is placed on an acoustic test fixture (ATF). Two models of an ATF manufactured by the French-German Research Institute of Saint-Louis (ISL) were evaluated with high-level acoustic impulses created by an acoustic shock tube at levels of 134 decibels (dB), 150 dB, and 168 dB. The fixtures were identical except that the E-A-RCAL ISL fixture had ear canals that were 3 mm longer than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) ISL fixture. Four hearing protection conditions were tested: Combat Arms earplug with the valve open, ETYPlugs(®) earplug, TacticalPro headset, and a dual-protector ETYPlugs earplug with TacticalPro earmuff. The IPILs measured for the E-A-RCAL fixture were 1.4 dB greater than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) ISL ATF. For the E-A-RCAL ISL ATF, the left ear IPIL was 2.0 dB greater than the right ear IPIL. For the NIOSH ATF, the right ear IPIL was 0.3 dB greater than the left ear IPIL. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4617327/ /pubmed/26356380 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.165067 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Orginal Article
Murphy, William J.
Fackler, Cameron J.
Berger, Elliott H.
Shaw, Peter B.
Stergar, Mike
Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube
title Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube
title_full Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube
title_fullStr Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube
title_short Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube
title_sort measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube
topic Orginal Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26356380
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.165067
work_keys_str_mv AT murphywilliamj measurementofimpulsepeakinsertionlossfromtwoacoustictestfixturesandfourhearingprotectorconditionswithanacousticshocktube
AT facklercameronj measurementofimpulsepeakinsertionlossfromtwoacoustictestfixturesandfourhearingprotectorconditionswithanacousticshocktube
AT bergerelliotth measurementofimpulsepeakinsertionlossfromtwoacoustictestfixturesandfourhearingprotectorconditionswithanacousticshocktube
AT shawpeterb measurementofimpulsepeakinsertionlossfromtwoacoustictestfixturesandfourhearingprotectorconditionswithanacousticshocktube
AT stergarmike measurementofimpulsepeakinsertionlossfromtwoacoustictestfixturesandfourhearingprotectorconditionswithanacousticshocktube