Cargando…

A Novel Image Cytometric Method for Quantitation of Immunohistochemical Staining of Cytoplasmic Antigens

Evaluation of molecular markers by immunohistochemical labelling of tissue sections has traditionally been performed by qualitative assessment by trained pathologists. For those markers with a staining component present outside of the nucleus, there has been no image histometric method available to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guillaud, M., Matthews, J. B., Harrison, A., MacAulay, C., Skov, K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9313824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/457297
_version_ 1782396817979211776
author Guillaud, M.
Matthews, J. B.
Harrison, A.
MacAulay, C.
Skov, K.
author_facet Guillaud, M.
Matthews, J. B.
Harrison, A.
MacAulay, C.
Skov, K.
author_sort Guillaud, M.
collection PubMed
description Evaluation of molecular markers by immunohistochemical labelling of tissue sections has traditionally been performed by qualitative assessment by trained pathologists. For those markers with a staining component present outside of the nucleus, there has been no image histometric method available to reliably and consistently define cell interfaces within the tissue. We present a new method of approximating cellular boundaries to define cellular regions within which quantitative measurements of staining intensity may be made. The method is based upon Voronoi tessellation of a defined region of interest (ROI), and requires only the position of the nuclear centroids within the ROI. Here we describe the VORSTAIN software which has been developed based on the Oncometrics CytoSavant Automated Image Cytometry System. To demonstrate this technique, human breast cancer sections immunohistochemically stained for bcl‐2 protein and counter‐stained with nuclear methyl green stain were evaluated. Intra‐observer variation in the measured values was between 1.5–2.6% and inter‐observer variation was between 1.8–4.4%. The primary source of variability was due to difficulties in interpreting the exact position of the nuclear centroids. Analysis of mean staining densities for each slide correlated well with subjective scoring performed by two independent pathologists. Using VORSTAIN, significant variation of staining intensities between regions within the same slide was measured for some sections, indicating a large degree of heterogeneity within the tumours. The ability to accurately quantitate the degree of heterogeneity of molecular marker expression within tumours may be a valuable tool in prognostication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4617584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46175842016-01-12 A Novel Image Cytometric Method for Quantitation of Immunohistochemical Staining of Cytoplasmic Antigens Guillaud, M. Matthews, J. B. Harrison, A. MacAulay, C. Skov, K. Anal Cell Pathol Other Evaluation of molecular markers by immunohistochemical labelling of tissue sections has traditionally been performed by qualitative assessment by trained pathologists. For those markers with a staining component present outside of the nucleus, there has been no image histometric method available to reliably and consistently define cell interfaces within the tissue. We present a new method of approximating cellular boundaries to define cellular regions within which quantitative measurements of staining intensity may be made. The method is based upon Voronoi tessellation of a defined region of interest (ROI), and requires only the position of the nuclear centroids within the ROI. Here we describe the VORSTAIN software which has been developed based on the Oncometrics CytoSavant Automated Image Cytometry System. To demonstrate this technique, human breast cancer sections immunohistochemically stained for bcl‐2 protein and counter‐stained with nuclear methyl green stain were evaluated. Intra‐observer variation in the measured values was between 1.5–2.6% and inter‐observer variation was between 1.8–4.4%. The primary source of variability was due to difficulties in interpreting the exact position of the nuclear centroids. Analysis of mean staining densities for each slide correlated well with subjective scoring performed by two independent pathologists. Using VORSTAIN, significant variation of staining intensities between regions within the same slide was measured for some sections, indicating a large degree of heterogeneity within the tumours. The ability to accurately quantitate the degree of heterogeneity of molecular marker expression within tumours may be a valuable tool in prognostication. IOS Press 1997 1997-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4617584/ /pubmed/9313824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/457297 Text en Copyright © 1997 Hindawi Publishing Corporation.
spellingShingle Other
Guillaud, M.
Matthews, J. B.
Harrison, A.
MacAulay, C.
Skov, K.
A Novel Image Cytometric Method for Quantitation of Immunohistochemical Staining of Cytoplasmic Antigens
title A Novel Image Cytometric Method for Quantitation of Immunohistochemical Staining of Cytoplasmic Antigens
title_full A Novel Image Cytometric Method for Quantitation of Immunohistochemical Staining of Cytoplasmic Antigens
title_fullStr A Novel Image Cytometric Method for Quantitation of Immunohistochemical Staining of Cytoplasmic Antigens
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Image Cytometric Method for Quantitation of Immunohistochemical Staining of Cytoplasmic Antigens
title_short A Novel Image Cytometric Method for Quantitation of Immunohistochemical Staining of Cytoplasmic Antigens
title_sort novel image cytometric method for quantitation of immunohistochemical staining of cytoplasmic antigens
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9313824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/457297
work_keys_str_mv AT guillaudm anovelimagecytometricmethodforquantitationofimmunohistochemicalstainingofcytoplasmicantigens
AT matthewsjb anovelimagecytometricmethodforquantitationofimmunohistochemicalstainingofcytoplasmicantigens
AT harrisona anovelimagecytometricmethodforquantitationofimmunohistochemicalstainingofcytoplasmicantigens
AT macaulayc anovelimagecytometricmethodforquantitationofimmunohistochemicalstainingofcytoplasmicantigens
AT skovk anovelimagecytometricmethodforquantitationofimmunohistochemicalstainingofcytoplasmicantigens
AT guillaudm novelimagecytometricmethodforquantitationofimmunohistochemicalstainingofcytoplasmicantigens
AT matthewsjb novelimagecytometricmethodforquantitationofimmunohistochemicalstainingofcytoplasmicantigens
AT harrisona novelimagecytometricmethodforquantitationofimmunohistochemicalstainingofcytoplasmicantigens
AT macaulayc novelimagecytometricmethodforquantitationofimmunohistochemicalstainingofcytoplasmicantigens
AT skovk novelimagecytometricmethodforquantitationofimmunohistochemicalstainingofcytoplasmicantigens