Cargando…

DNA Quality Assessment for Array CGH by Isothermal Whole Genome Amplification

Background: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array CGH) is increasingly applied on DNA obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, but in a proportion of cases this type of DNA is unsuitable. Due to the high experimental costs of array CGH and unreliable methods for DNA qua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buffart, Tineke E., Tijssen, Marianne, Krugers, Thijs, Carvalho, Beatriz, Smeets, Serge J., Brakenhoff, Ruud H., Grabsch, Heike, Meijer, Gerrit A., Sadowski, Henry B., Ylstra, Bauke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17641418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/709290
_version_ 1782396840794128384
author Buffart, Tineke E.
Tijssen, Marianne
Krugers, Thijs
Carvalho, Beatriz
Smeets, Serge J.
Brakenhoff, Ruud H.
Grabsch, Heike
Meijer, Gerrit A.
Sadowski, Henry B.
Ylstra, Bauke
author_facet Buffart, Tineke E.
Tijssen, Marianne
Krugers, Thijs
Carvalho, Beatriz
Smeets, Serge J.
Brakenhoff, Ruud H.
Grabsch, Heike
Meijer, Gerrit A.
Sadowski, Henry B.
Ylstra, Bauke
author_sort Buffart, Tineke E.
collection PubMed
description Background: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array CGH) is increasingly applied on DNA obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, but in a proportion of cases this type of DNA is unsuitable. Due to the high experimental costs of array CGH and unreliable methods for DNA quality testing, better prediction methods are needed. The aim of this study was to accurately determine the quality of FFPE DNA input in order to predict quality of array CGH outcome. Material and Methods: DNA quality was assessed by isothermal amplification and compared to array CGH quality on 59 FFPE gastric cancer samples, one FFPE colorectal cancer sample, two FFPE normal uvula samples, one fresh frozen and six FFPE HNSCC samples. Gastric cancer DNA was also quality tested by β-globin PCR. Results: Accurate prediction of DNA quality using the isothermal amplification was observed in the colorectal carcinoma, HNSCC and uvula samples. In gastric cancer samples, the isothermal amplification was a more accurate method for selecting good quality DNA for array CGH compared to using PCR product lengths. The isothermal amplification product was used for array CGH and compared to the results achieved using non-amplified DNA in four of the samples. DNAs before and after amplification yielded the same segmentation patterns of chromosomal copy number changes for both the fresh DNA sample and the FFPE samples. Conclusion: The efficiency of isothermal DNA amplification is a reliable predictor for array CGH quality. The amplification product itself can be used for array CGH, even starting with FFPE derived DNA samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4617808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46178082016-01-12 DNA Quality Assessment for Array CGH by Isothermal Whole Genome Amplification Buffart, Tineke E. Tijssen, Marianne Krugers, Thijs Carvalho, Beatriz Smeets, Serge J. Brakenhoff, Ruud H. Grabsch, Heike Meijer, Gerrit A. Sadowski, Henry B. Ylstra, Bauke Cell Oncol Other Background: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array CGH) is increasingly applied on DNA obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, but in a proportion of cases this type of DNA is unsuitable. Due to the high experimental costs of array CGH and unreliable methods for DNA quality testing, better prediction methods are needed. The aim of this study was to accurately determine the quality of FFPE DNA input in order to predict quality of array CGH outcome. Material and Methods: DNA quality was assessed by isothermal amplification and compared to array CGH quality on 59 FFPE gastric cancer samples, one FFPE colorectal cancer sample, two FFPE normal uvula samples, one fresh frozen and six FFPE HNSCC samples. Gastric cancer DNA was also quality tested by β-globin PCR. Results: Accurate prediction of DNA quality using the isothermal amplification was observed in the colorectal carcinoma, HNSCC and uvula samples. In gastric cancer samples, the isothermal amplification was a more accurate method for selecting good quality DNA for array CGH compared to using PCR product lengths. The isothermal amplification product was used for array CGH and compared to the results achieved using non-amplified DNA in four of the samples. DNAs before and after amplification yielded the same segmentation patterns of chromosomal copy number changes for both the fresh DNA sample and the FFPE samples. Conclusion: The efficiency of isothermal DNA amplification is a reliable predictor for array CGH quality. The amplification product itself can be used for array CGH, even starting with FFPE derived DNA samples. IOS Press 2007 2007-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4617808/ /pubmed/17641418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/709290 Text en Copyright © 2007 Hindawi Publishing Corporation and the authors.
spellingShingle Other
Buffart, Tineke E.
Tijssen, Marianne
Krugers, Thijs
Carvalho, Beatriz
Smeets, Serge J.
Brakenhoff, Ruud H.
Grabsch, Heike
Meijer, Gerrit A.
Sadowski, Henry B.
Ylstra, Bauke
DNA Quality Assessment for Array CGH by Isothermal Whole Genome Amplification
title DNA Quality Assessment for Array CGH by Isothermal Whole Genome Amplification
title_full DNA Quality Assessment for Array CGH by Isothermal Whole Genome Amplification
title_fullStr DNA Quality Assessment for Array CGH by Isothermal Whole Genome Amplification
title_full_unstemmed DNA Quality Assessment for Array CGH by Isothermal Whole Genome Amplification
title_short DNA Quality Assessment for Array CGH by Isothermal Whole Genome Amplification
title_sort dna quality assessment for array cgh by isothermal whole genome amplification
topic Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17641418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/709290
work_keys_str_mv AT buffarttinekee dnaqualityassessmentforarraycghbyisothermalwholegenomeamplification
AT tijssenmarianne dnaqualityassessmentforarraycghbyisothermalwholegenomeamplification
AT krugersthijs dnaqualityassessmentforarraycghbyisothermalwholegenomeamplification
AT carvalhobeatriz dnaqualityassessmentforarraycghbyisothermalwholegenomeamplification
AT smeetssergej dnaqualityassessmentforarraycghbyisothermalwholegenomeamplification
AT brakenhoffruudh dnaqualityassessmentforarraycghbyisothermalwholegenomeamplification
AT grabschheike dnaqualityassessmentforarraycghbyisothermalwholegenomeamplification
AT meijergerrita dnaqualityassessmentforarraycghbyisothermalwholegenomeamplification
AT sadowskihenryb dnaqualityassessmentforarraycghbyisothermalwholegenomeamplification
AT ylstrabauke dnaqualityassessmentforarraycghbyisothermalwholegenomeamplification