Cargando…

Psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients

BACKGROUND: Psychological, behavioral and social factors have long been considered important in the development of persistent pain. Little is known about how chiropractic low back pain (LBP) patients compare to other LBP patients in terms of psychological/behavioral characteristics. METHODS: In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eklund, Andreas, Bergström, Gunnar, Bodin, Lennart, Axén, Iben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26483193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0753-5
_version_ 1782396849842290688
author Eklund, Andreas
Bergström, Gunnar
Bodin, Lennart
Axén, Iben
author_facet Eklund, Andreas
Bergström, Gunnar
Bodin, Lennart
Axén, Iben
author_sort Eklund, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Psychological, behavioral and social factors have long been considered important in the development of persistent pain. Little is known about how chiropractic low back pain (LBP) patients compare to other LBP patients in terms of psychological/behavioral characteristics. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, the aim was to investigate patients with LBP as regards to psychosocial/behavioral characteristics by describing a chiropractic primary care population and comparing this sample to three other populations using the MPI-S instrument. Thus, four different samples were compared. A: Four hundred eighty subjects from chiropractic primary care clinics. B: One hundred twenty-eight subjects from a gainfully employed population (sick listed with high risk of developing chronicity). C: Two hundred seventy-three subjects from a secondary care rehabilitation clinic. D: Two hundred thirty-five subjects from secondary care clinics. The Swedish version of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-S) was used to collect data. Subjects were classified using a cluster analytic strategy into three pre-defined subgroups (named adaptive copers, dysfunctional and interpersonally distressed). RESULTS: The data show statistically significant overall differences across samples for the subgroups based on psychological and behavioral characteristics. The cluster classifications placed (in terms of the proportions of the adaptive copers and dysfunctional subgroups) sample A between B and the two secondary care samples C and D. CONCLUSIONS: The chiropractic primary care sample was more affected by pain and worse off with regards to psychological and behavioral characteristics compared to the other primary care sample. Based on our findings from the MPI-S instrument the 4 samples may be considered statistically and clinically different. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Sample A comes from an ongoing trial registered at clinical trials.gov; NCT01539863, February 22, 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4617861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46178612015-10-25 Psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients Eklund, Andreas Bergström, Gunnar Bodin, Lennart Axén, Iben BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Psychological, behavioral and social factors have long been considered important in the development of persistent pain. Little is known about how chiropractic low back pain (LBP) patients compare to other LBP patients in terms of psychological/behavioral characteristics. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, the aim was to investigate patients with LBP as regards to psychosocial/behavioral characteristics by describing a chiropractic primary care population and comparing this sample to three other populations using the MPI-S instrument. Thus, four different samples were compared. A: Four hundred eighty subjects from chiropractic primary care clinics. B: One hundred twenty-eight subjects from a gainfully employed population (sick listed with high risk of developing chronicity). C: Two hundred seventy-three subjects from a secondary care rehabilitation clinic. D: Two hundred thirty-five subjects from secondary care clinics. The Swedish version of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-S) was used to collect data. Subjects were classified using a cluster analytic strategy into three pre-defined subgroups (named adaptive copers, dysfunctional and interpersonally distressed). RESULTS: The data show statistically significant overall differences across samples for the subgroups based on psychological and behavioral characteristics. The cluster classifications placed (in terms of the proportions of the adaptive copers and dysfunctional subgroups) sample A between B and the two secondary care samples C and D. CONCLUSIONS: The chiropractic primary care sample was more affected by pain and worse off with regards to psychological and behavioral characteristics compared to the other primary care sample. Based on our findings from the MPI-S instrument the 4 samples may be considered statistically and clinically different. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Sample A comes from an ongoing trial registered at clinical trials.gov; NCT01539863, February 22, 2012. BioMed Central 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4617861/ /pubmed/26483193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0753-5 Text en © Eklund et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eklund, Andreas
Bergström, Gunnar
Bodin, Lennart
Axén, Iben
Psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients
title Psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients
title_full Psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients
title_fullStr Psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients
title_full_unstemmed Psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients
title_short Psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients
title_sort psychological and behavioral differences between low back pain populations: a comparative analysis of chiropractic, primary and secondary care patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26483193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0753-5
work_keys_str_mv AT eklundandreas psychologicalandbehavioraldifferencesbetweenlowbackpainpopulationsacomparativeanalysisofchiropracticprimaryandsecondarycarepatients
AT bergstromgunnar psychologicalandbehavioraldifferencesbetweenlowbackpainpopulationsacomparativeanalysisofchiropracticprimaryandsecondarycarepatients
AT bodinlennart psychologicalandbehavioraldifferencesbetweenlowbackpainpopulationsacomparativeanalysisofchiropracticprimaryandsecondarycarepatients
AT axeniben psychologicalandbehavioraldifferencesbetweenlowbackpainpopulationsacomparativeanalysisofchiropracticprimaryandsecondarycarepatients