Cargando…

Use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Although many countries have implemented strict legal rules, the prevalence of physical restraints in nursing homes seems to remain high. In Switzerland, data related to the frequency of physical restraints are scarce and little is known about associations with resident and nursing home...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofmann, Hedi, Schorro, Ewald, Haastert, Burkhard, Meyer, Gabriele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26489664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0125-x
_version_ 1782396860687712256
author Hofmann, Hedi
Schorro, Ewald
Haastert, Burkhard
Meyer, Gabriele
author_facet Hofmann, Hedi
Schorro, Ewald
Haastert, Burkhard
Meyer, Gabriele
author_sort Hofmann, Hedi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although many countries have implemented strict legal rules, the prevalence of physical restraints in nursing homes seems to remain high. In Switzerland, data related to the frequency of physical restraints are scarce and little is known about associations with resident and nursing home characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and types of physical restraints in nursing homes in two Swiss cantons and to explore whether resident-related and organisational factors are associated with the use of physical restraints. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional study. Twenty nursing homes with 1362 residents from two culturally different cantons were included. Data on physical restraints and residents’ characteristics were extracted from residents’ records (11/2013 to 2/2014). Organisational data were collected by questionnaires addressing nursing home directors or nursing managers. Sample size calculation and outcome analysis took cluster-adjustment into account. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis with nursing homes as random effect were used for investigation. RESULTS: The prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26.8 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 19.8–33.8). Centre prevalence ranged from 2.6 to 61.2 %. Bilateral bedrails were most frequently used (20.3 %, 95 % CI 13.5–27.1). Length of residence, degrees of care dependency and mobility limitation were significantly positively associated with the use of physical restraint, but none of the organisational characteristics was significantly associated. CONCLUSION: Approximately a quarter of the nursing home residents included in our study experienced physical restraints. Since variation between nursing homes was pronounced, it seems to be worthwhile to explore nursing homes with particularly low and high use of physical restraints in future research, especially by using qualitative methods. There is a need for effective interventions aiming at restraint-free nursing care. Development of interventional approaches should consider specific residents’ characteristics associated with restraint use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4617908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46179082015-10-25 Use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study Hofmann, Hedi Schorro, Ewald Haastert, Burkhard Meyer, Gabriele BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Although many countries have implemented strict legal rules, the prevalence of physical restraints in nursing homes seems to remain high. In Switzerland, data related to the frequency of physical restraints are scarce and little is known about associations with resident and nursing home characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and types of physical restraints in nursing homes in two Swiss cantons and to explore whether resident-related and organisational factors are associated with the use of physical restraints. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional study. Twenty nursing homes with 1362 residents from two culturally different cantons were included. Data on physical restraints and residents’ characteristics were extracted from residents’ records (11/2013 to 2/2014). Organisational data were collected by questionnaires addressing nursing home directors or nursing managers. Sample size calculation and outcome analysis took cluster-adjustment into account. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis with nursing homes as random effect were used for investigation. RESULTS: The prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26.8 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 19.8–33.8). Centre prevalence ranged from 2.6 to 61.2 %. Bilateral bedrails were most frequently used (20.3 %, 95 % CI 13.5–27.1). Length of residence, degrees of care dependency and mobility limitation were significantly positively associated with the use of physical restraint, but none of the organisational characteristics was significantly associated. CONCLUSION: Approximately a quarter of the nursing home residents included in our study experienced physical restraints. Since variation between nursing homes was pronounced, it seems to be worthwhile to explore nursing homes with particularly low and high use of physical restraints in future research, especially by using qualitative methods. There is a need for effective interventions aiming at restraint-free nursing care. Development of interventional approaches should consider specific residents’ characteristics associated with restraint use. BioMed Central 2015-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4617908/ /pubmed/26489664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0125-x Text en © Hofmann et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hofmann, Hedi
Schorro, Ewald
Haastert, Burkhard
Meyer, Gabriele
Use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study
title Use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study
title_full Use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study
title_short Use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study
title_sort use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26489664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0125-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmannhedi useofphysicalrestraintsinnursinghomesamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT schorroewald useofphysicalrestraintsinnursinghomesamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT haastertburkhard useofphysicalrestraintsinnursinghomesamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT meyergabriele useofphysicalrestraintsinnursinghomesamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy