Cargando…

Lessons learned from England’s Health Checks Programme: using qualitative research to identify and share best practice

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the challenges and barriers faced by staff involved in the delivery of the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check, a systematic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management program in primary care. METHODS: Data have been derived from three...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ismail, Hanif, Kelly, Shona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26486126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0365-z
_version_ 1782396877945176064
author Ismail, Hanif
Kelly, Shona
author_facet Ismail, Hanif
Kelly, Shona
author_sort Ismail, Hanif
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the challenges and barriers faced by staff involved in the delivery of the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check, a systematic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management program in primary care. METHODS: Data have been derived from three qualitative evaluations that were conducted in 25 General Practices and involved in depth interviews with 58 staff involved all levels of the delivery of the Health Checks. Analysis of the data was undertaken using the framework approach and findings are reported within the context of research and practice considerations. RESULTS: Findings indicated that there is no ‘one size fits all’ blueprint for maximising uptake although success factors were identified: evolution of the programme over time in response to local needs to suit the particular characteristics of the patient population; individual staff characteristics such as being proactive, enthusiastic and having specific responsibility; a supportive team. Training was clearly identified as an area that needed addressing and practitioners would benefit from CVD specific baseline training and refresher courses to keep them up to date with recent developments in the area. However there were other external factors that impinged on an individual’s ability to provide an effective service, some of these were outside the control of individuals and included cutbacks in referral services, insufficient space to run clinics or general awareness of the Health Checks amongst patients. CONCLUSIONS: The everyday experiences of practitioners who participated in this study suggest that overall, Health Check is perceived as a worthwhile exercise. But, organisational and structural barriers need to be addressed. We also recommend that clear referral pathways be in place so staff can refer patients to appropriate services (healthy eating sessions, smoking cessation, and exercise referrals). Local authorities need to support initiatives that enable data sharing and linkage so that GP Practices are informed when patients take up services such as smoking cessation or alcohol harm reduction programmes run by social services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0365-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4618054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-46180542015-10-25 Lessons learned from England’s Health Checks Programme: using qualitative research to identify and share best practice Ismail, Hanif Kelly, Shona BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the challenges and barriers faced by staff involved in the delivery of the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check, a systematic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management program in primary care. METHODS: Data have been derived from three qualitative evaluations that were conducted in 25 General Practices and involved in depth interviews with 58 staff involved all levels of the delivery of the Health Checks. Analysis of the data was undertaken using the framework approach and findings are reported within the context of research and practice considerations. RESULTS: Findings indicated that there is no ‘one size fits all’ blueprint for maximising uptake although success factors were identified: evolution of the programme over time in response to local needs to suit the particular characteristics of the patient population; individual staff characteristics such as being proactive, enthusiastic and having specific responsibility; a supportive team. Training was clearly identified as an area that needed addressing and practitioners would benefit from CVD specific baseline training and refresher courses to keep them up to date with recent developments in the area. However there were other external factors that impinged on an individual’s ability to provide an effective service, some of these were outside the control of individuals and included cutbacks in referral services, insufficient space to run clinics or general awareness of the Health Checks amongst patients. CONCLUSIONS: The everyday experiences of practitioners who participated in this study suggest that overall, Health Check is perceived as a worthwhile exercise. But, organisational and structural barriers need to be addressed. We also recommend that clear referral pathways be in place so staff can refer patients to appropriate services (healthy eating sessions, smoking cessation, and exercise referrals). Local authorities need to support initiatives that enable data sharing and linkage so that GP Practices are informed when patients take up services such as smoking cessation or alcohol harm reduction programmes run by social services. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0365-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4618054/ /pubmed/26486126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0365-z Text en © Ismail and Kelly. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ismail, Hanif
Kelly, Shona
Lessons learned from England’s Health Checks Programme: using qualitative research to identify and share best practice
title Lessons learned from England’s Health Checks Programme: using qualitative research to identify and share best practice
title_full Lessons learned from England’s Health Checks Programme: using qualitative research to identify and share best practice
title_fullStr Lessons learned from England’s Health Checks Programme: using qualitative research to identify and share best practice
title_full_unstemmed Lessons learned from England’s Health Checks Programme: using qualitative research to identify and share best practice
title_short Lessons learned from England’s Health Checks Programme: using qualitative research to identify and share best practice
title_sort lessons learned from england’s health checks programme: using qualitative research to identify and share best practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26486126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0365-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ismailhanif lessonslearnedfromenglandshealthchecksprogrammeusingqualitativeresearchtoidentifyandsharebestpractice
AT kellyshona lessonslearnedfromenglandshealthchecksprogrammeusingqualitativeresearchtoidentifyandsharebestpractice